img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索

黄金科学技术 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 123-131.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2024.01.161

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

压力型锚索锚固段荷载传递特征及影响因素研究

王开彬1(),刘钦2,王洪涛3()   

  1. 1.山东省工程咨询院,山东 济南 250013
    2.山东黄金集团有限公司,山东 济南 250101
    3.山东建筑大学土木工程学院,山东 济南 250101
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-01 修回日期:2023-12-20 出版日期:2024-02-29 发布日期:2024-03-22
  • 通讯作者: 王洪涛 E-mail:wangkaibin5@163.com;wanghongtao918@163.com
  • 作者简介:王开彬(1975-),男,山东兰陵人,博士,高级工程师,从事岩土力学理论及应用研究工作。wangkaibin5@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“深部巷道碎裂围岩锚索拉剪失效特效及预应力全锚控制机理”(52374093);中国博士后科学基金项目“弱胶结软弱隧洞围岩喷射混凝土粘结界面弱化失效力学机理研究”(2022M711314);山东省自然科学基金项目“弱胶结软岩—喷射混凝土界面弱化失效的宏细观力学特性研究”(ZR2022ME088);济南市科研带头人工作室项目“软弱地层地下工程围岩灾变预警及主动控制技术”(202333054)

Study on the Load Transfer Characteristics and Influence Factors of Anchora-ge Segment of Pressure-type Anchor Cable

Kaibin WANG1(),Qin LIU2,Hongtao WANG3()   

  1. 1.Shandong Engineering Consulting Institute, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China
    2.Shandong Gold Group Co. , Ltd. , Jinan 250101, Shandong, China
    3.Shandong Jianzhu University, School of Civil Engineering, Jinan 250101, Shandong, China
  • Received:2023-12-01 Revised:2023-12-20 Online:2024-02-29 Published:2024-03-22
  • Contact: Hongtao WANG E-mail:wangkaibin5@163.com;wanghongtao918@163.com

摘要:

为了研究土层压力型锚索锚固段的荷载传递特征及滑脱过程,在理论分析的基础上推导出压力型锚索在外荷载作用下的剪应力和轴力分布规律公式,详细分析了各影响因素对轴向力和剪应力的影响程度。研究结果表明:锚索锚固段的剪应力和轴力分布函数均为幂函数;剪应力和轴力大小及分布范围取决于锚固力,并与锚固体直径、锚固体弹性模量和泊松比、土的压缩模量和泊松比以及锚固体和土间界面的摩擦角有关;预应力锚索锚固段的最大剪应力位置仅与锚固体直径、土体性质、锚固体材料参数和半径有关;锚固体直径的大小对剪应力和轴力均有显著影响;在不同荷载作用下,锚固体界面剪应力的分布形式、范围和峰值位置均相同。现场原位试验结果表明:理论分析结果与工程实践结果吻合性较好。研究结果可为分析土体锚固工程的受力状态及优化设计提供依据。

关键词: 锚索, 锚固段, 荷载传递特征, 影响因素, 理论分析, 数值模拟, 岩体工程

Abstract:

In order to study the load transfer characteristics and the slippage process of anchorage segment of the pressure-type anchor cable in soil strata,the formula of shear stress and axial force distribution of the anchor cable under external load was derived based on theoretical analysis.In addition,the load transfer characteristics was analyzed.The influence degree of soil compressive modulus,anchor diameter,load and Poisson’s ratio on axial force and shear stress were analyzed in detail.The shear stress and axial force in the anchorage segment of the cable has the same distribution function and is all power functions.The shear stress and axial force are the largest near the bearing plate,but far from the bearing plate,the shear stress and axial force gradually decrease to zero.The magnitude and distribution range of the shear stress and axial force in the anchorage segment mainly depend on the anchorage force,and are related to the diameter,elastic modulus and Poisson ratio of anchor body,the compressibility modulus and Poisson ratio of soils,and friction angle of the interface between anchors and soils.In the form of the formula,if the anchorage segment is infinite,the anchoring force P can be infinite in theory.The ultimate anchoring force depends on the strength of the anchors around the bearing plate,the soil and the interface.The position of the maximum shear stress is only related to the soil properties,material parameters and radius of anchorage in anchorage segment of prestressed cable,not related to the magnitude of load.The diameter of anchors also has significant influence on the distribution of shear stress and axial force.With different loads,the distribution form,range and peak position of shear stress is the same,which is independent of load.Under the same conditions,the larger the compressive modulus of soil,the larger of shear stress,and the faster the shear stress decline trendation.The Poisson’s ratio has little effect on the shear stress.When the value of Poisson’s ratio is different,the mechanical property of the whole anchorage system under external load is basically unchanged,and also the value of shear stress.The range of action remains and the axial force is unchanged.In order to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis results,the load transfer test results of the anchor cable were obtained by in-situ tests of clay and sandy soil.The in-situ test results show that the theoretical analysis results are in good agreement with the engineering results.The research results can provide a basis for analyzing the stress state and optimizing design of soil anchorage engineering.

Key words: anchor cable, anchorage segment, oad transfer characteristics, influence factor, theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, rock mass engineering

中图分类号: 

  • TU473

图1

锚固体微元段的受力图"

图2

剪应力和轴力分布曲线"

图3

剪应力和轴力分布与土层压缩模量Ks的关系"

图4

剪应力和轴力分布与弹性模量Ea的关系"

图5

剪应力和轴力分布与φ值的关系"

图6

剪应力和轴力分布与直径的关系"

图7

剪应力和轴力分布与荷载的关系"

图8

剪应力和轴力分布与μ′的关系"

图9

剪应力和轴力分布与μ的关系"

图10

中心锚固承压板法现场试验图"

表1

变形模量与弹性模量计算结果"

承压板型号变形模量/MPa弹性模量/MPa
CYB-A122.2726.70
CYB-B122.5029.87
CYB-A217.7826.87
CYB-B218.0327.57
CYB-A323.4233.62
CYB-B323.5633.21

图11

刚度试验曲线"

Chen Yumin, Wang Chenglong, Li Xiaofei,et al,2020.Combined support technology of resin anchor cable for high stress rock mass under deep complex structure in Jiaojia gold mine[J].Gold Science and Technology,28(5):727-733.
Cui Jinghao, Cui Yan,2000.Several key problems of anchoring anti-floating design[J].Special Structure,(1):9-14.
He Siming, Wang Chenghua, Wu Wenhua,2004.Analysis on load-deformation of prestressed cable based on damage theory[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,23(5):786-792.
Tao Zhigang, Ren Shulin, Hao Yu,et al,2021.Physical model experiment on failure mechanism and NPR anchor cable control effect of layered counter-tilt slope[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,42(4):976-990.
Wang Guofu, Li Qiang, Lu Linhai,et al,2018.Research and application of a new coupled model of anchor prestress loss and rock creep[J].Building Structure,48(5):110-114.
Wang Kaibin,2015.Research on the Load Transfer Characteristic and the Effect of Soil Anchor[D].Qingdao:Shandong University of Science and Technology.
Wang Kezhong, Wu Hui, Zhao Yufei,2018.Coupling between reduction of force in prestressed anchor cable and rock creep in deep-buried underground powerhouse[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,37(6):1681-1488.
Wei Zhiyuan, Wang Yong, Gong Xiaonan,et al,2021.Field test and numerical simulation of anchor cable in water-rich sand and pebble two-layer strata[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,17(5):1507-1516.
Xia Yuanyou, Ye Hong, Liu Xiaohe,et al,2010.Analysis of shear stress along pressure-type anchorage cable in weathered rock mass[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,31(12):3861-3866.
Yan Minjia, Xia Yuanyou, Liu Tingting,2018.Limit analysis of bedding rock slope reinforced by prestressed anchor cables under seismic loads[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,39(7):2691-2698.
Ye Hong, Li Yan,2022.Shear stress analysis of bending anchorage section of prestressed anchor cable in soft rock and soil[J].Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science),41(1):91-95.
You Chun’an,2004a.Theory and Application Study on Stress-transfer Mechanism of Anchoring Aystem[D].Tai’an:Shandong University of Science and Technology.
You Chun’an,2004b.Mechanical analysis on anchorage segment of pressure-type cable[J].Geotechnical Engineering,26(6):828-831.
You Chun’an, Zhan Yubao,2005.Distribution characteristics and analysis of stresses in prestressed cables[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,24(6):925-928.
You Chunan, Zhan Yubao, Liu Qiuyuan,et al,2013.Shear lag-debonding model for anchorage section of prestressed anchor cable[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,32(4):800-806.
Zhang Junbao, Li Changcun, Li Yunpeng,et al,2022.Large deformation control system of surrounding rock of super large section cable tunnel with negative Poisson's ratio anchor[J].Science Technology and Engineering,22(17):7155-7164.
陈玉民,王成龙,李晓飞,等,2020.焦家金矿深部复杂构造下高应力岩体树脂锚索联合支护技术[J].黄金科学技术,28(5):727-733.
崔京浩,崔岩,2000.锚固抗浮设计的几个关键问题[J].特种结构,(1):9-14.
何思明,王成华,吴文华,2004.基于损伤理论的预应力锚索荷载—变形特性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,23(5):786-792.
陶志刚,任树林,郝宇,等,2021.层状反倾边坡破坏机制及NPR锚索控制效果物理模型试验[J].岩土力学,42(4):976-990.
王国富,李强,路林海,等,2018.锚索预应力蠕变损失计算新模型及工程应用[J].建筑结构,48(5):110-114.
王开彬,2015.土层锚固体荷载传递特征及其效应研究[D].青岛:山东科技大学.
王克忠,吴慧,赵宇飞,2018.深部地下厂房锚索预应力损失与岩体蠕变耦合分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,37(6):1681-1488.
魏支援,王勇,龚晓南,等,2021.富水砂加卵石双地层锚索现场试验及数值模拟[J].地下空间与工程学报,17(5):1507-1516.
夏元友,叶红,刘笑合,等,2010.风化岩体中压力型锚索锚固段的剪应力分析[J].岩土力学,31(12):3861-3866.
严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷,2018.地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J].岩土力学,39(7):2691-2698.
叶红,李艳,2022.软弱岩土体中预应力锚索弯曲锚固段剪应力分析[J].重庆交通大学学报,41(1):91-95.
尤春安,2004a.锚固系统应力传递机理理论及应用研究[D].泰安:山东科技大学.
尤春安,2004b.压力型锚索锚固段的受力分析[J].岩土工程学报,26(6):828-831.
尤春安,战玉宝,2005.预应力锚索锚固段的应力分布规律及分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,24(6):925-928.
尤春安,战玉宝,刘秋媛,2013.预应力锚索锚固段的剪滞—脱黏模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报,32(4):800-806.
张君宝,李昌存,李韫芃,等,2022.负泊松比锚索超大断面隧道围岩大变形控制体系[J].科学技术与工程,22(17):7155-7164.
[1] 徐泽峰,史秀志,黄仁东,丁文智,陈新. 基于满管输送的充填管路优化研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2024, 32(1): 160-169.
[2] 李杰林, 刘一良, 王玉普, 李在利, 周科平, 程春龙. 高温独头巷道压抽混合式通风参数对人工制冷降温效果的影响[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2024, 32(1): 63-74.
[3] 张帅,赵鑫,彭祥玉,王宇斌,桂婉婷,田家怡. 基于双隐含层BP神经网络的某金矿回收率预测研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2024, 32(1): 170-178.
[4] 费鸿禄, 纪海楠, 山杰. 露天台阶水介质间隔装药结构优选及对比试验研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(6): 930-943.
[5] 许云美, 袁利伟, 龙皓楠. 干堆尾矿库稳定性影响因素的敏感性分析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(6): 1014-1022.
[6] 张玉, 王文己, 孙加奇, 肖永刚. 层理结构板岩动态断裂特性[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(5): 803-810.
[7] 张国栋, 刘佳, 马凤山, 李光, 郭捷. 三山岛金矿海底开采井下沉降特点及影响因素浅析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(5): 785-793.
[8] 单文法, 毛先成, 刘占坤, 邓浩, 陈进, 张维, 王海正, 杨鑫. 胶东大尹格庄金矿床成矿过程数值模拟及其找矿意义[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(5): 707-720.
[9] 廖秋敏,罗连英. 稀土产品全球贸易网络格局演化及其影响因素[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(5): 823-834.
[10] 何玉龙, 刘佳, 马凤山, 李光, 郭捷. 三山岛金矿地面沉降特征及原因分析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(4): 605-612.
[11] 赵亚楠, 赵一航, 蒋中明, 赵红敏. 基于离散元法的高放核废料储罐静动力稳定性初步研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(4): 592-604.
[12] 郭对明,李国清,侯杰,胡乃联. 基于FLUENT的深井掘进巷道局部通风参数优化[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022, 30(5): 753-763.
[13] 马恒,高嘉毅,李世虎,高科. 双机并联空气幕射流角度对巷道风流的影响[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022, 30(5): 743-752.
[14] 周占星,刘科伟,李旭东,黄晓辉,马泗洲. 油罐爆炸作用下隧道衬砌动力响应数值模拟研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022, 30(4): 612-622.
[15] 王卫华,刘洋,张理维,张恒根. 基于RHT模型双孔同时爆破均质岩体损伤的数值模拟[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022, 30(3): 414-426.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!