img

Wechat

Adv. Search

Gold Science and Technology ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 863-873.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2021.06.043

• Mining Technology and Mine Management • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental Study on Rock Burst Tendency and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Limestone at Different Buried Depths

Qiang ZENG1,2(),Xiaorong HUANG3,Xiaojun WANG1,2(),Qinglin CHEN1,2,Jian LIU1,2,Cong GONG1,2   

  1. 1.School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
    2.Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Mining Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
    3.No. 1 Nonferrous Geological Team, Jiangxi Bureau of Geology, Yingtan 335000, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2021-03-23 Revised:2021-05-21 Online:2021-12-31 Published:2022-03-07
  • Contact: Xiaojun WANG E-mail:286405502@qq.com;xiaojun7903@126.com

Abstract:

With the increasing demand for mineral resources,deep mining is becoming more and more popular in mines and rock burst disasters are becoming more and more frequent. Rock burst warning and prevention have become one of the major safety issues that need to be solved in the field of geotechnical engineering in the world today. The acoustic emission of rock is an effective carrier to reflect the internal damage information of rock. The study on the characteristics of acoustic emission parameters in the process of rock burst rupture and instability provides a theoretical basis for the early warning of rock burst by acoustic emission parameters in deep mining. Limestone core samples were obtained from the same borehole at different depths in a copper mine. By carrying out conventional uniaxial tests of limestone with different buried depths,the stress-strain curve and acoustic emission time-domain characteristic parameters in the limestone failure process were obtained; the elastic energy index WETdeformation brittleness index Kε and linear elastic energy Weindex were used to distinguish Limestone rock burst tendency of different buried depths; By analyzing the characteristic parameters of acoustic emission in the failure process of limestone and their changing laws,the precursor information characteristics of rock bursts were established. The results show that with the depth gradient increases,when the buried depth is more than 1 000 m,the limestone has a strong rock burst tendency.The accumulative energy-time variation curve of acoustic emission during the compressive failure of lime stones at different depths can be divided into three stages,namely,steady stage,growth stage and failure stage. The stable stage is in the initial compaction stage of limestone. As the tendency of limestone rock burst becomes stronger,the axial strain corresponding to the acoustic emission energy at this stage becomes smaller. The growth stage is the expansion stage of new fissures in the limestone rock. The cumulative acoustic emission energy changes with the depth of the burial depth and presents a “step-like”evolution to a “smooth”growth form,and the failure stage is the stage of macroscopic cracks causing rock mass destruction. In this stage,as the tendency of limestone rock burst gradually increases,the energy released by rock burst increases.The dominant frequency of each deep limestone sample is mainly the low frequency band of 90~180 kHz,while the medium and strong rock burst tendencies have a high frequency secondary frequency of 270~330 kHz.The fractal characteristics of the acoustic emission energy rate of limestone under the depth gradient are consistent with the evolution law of its internal fissures.The evolution mode of fractal dimension value of limestone rock burst tendency from weak to strong at different depths is based on “up-dimension-wave-dimension reduction”.The evolution of “steady-dimensional reduction” can provide a theoretical basis for early warning of rock burst in deep mining.

Key words: rock mechanics, rock burst tendency, acoustic emission, correlation dimension, fracture mechanism

CLC Number: 

  • TD315

Fig.1

Schematic diagram of limestone rock sampling"

Fig.2

Schematic diagram of acoustic emission system of rock"

Fig.3

Stress-strain curves of limestone with different buried depths"

Table 1

Physical and mechanical parameters of the limestone rock with different buried depths"

埋深/m弹性模量 /GPa抗压强度 /MPa卸载应力点 /MPa密度 /(g·cm-3孔隙率 /%
60016.3458.8851.642.6551.148
70019.9756.8450.152.7261.108
80020.8677.5066.342.7681.111
90021.01105.5590.752.7720.940
1 00022.07118.93108.642.7800.919

Fig.4

Typical loading and unloading curves of rock"

Table 2

Results of rock burst tendency of limestone with different depths based on multiple criterion"

埋深/m岩爆倾向判据一岩爆倾向判据二岩爆倾向判据三综合岩爆等级
弹性能量指数岩爆等级变形脆性指数岩爆等级线弹性能岩爆等级
6001.91无岩爆1.81无岩爆42.68弱岩爆无岩爆
7002.46弱岩爆2.63弱岩爆49.14弱岩爆弱岩爆
8003.95中等岩爆4.05弱岩爆101.01中等岩爆中等岩爆
9004.08中等岩爆6.38中等岩爆182.76中等岩爆中等岩爆
1 0005.28强岩爆9.71强岩爆257.91强岩爆强岩爆

Fig.5

Stress-strain diagram of limestone with different depths and corresponding variation of cumulative acoustic emission(AE) energy"

Table 3

Characteristic strength and percentage of limestone"

埋深/m起裂强度σc2/ MPa占应力百分比/%损伤强度σc3/ MPa占应力百分比/%
60017.6129.9145.3078.23
70021.2333.3743.1775.95
80017.2631.8754.1569.88
90039.5537.4789.9785.68
1 00042.6135.7495.1179.83

Fig.6

Variation curve of main frequency of limestone acoastic emission(AE) with time and distribution map of main frequency"

Fig.7

Relation curves of phase space dimension and correlation dimension"

Fig.8

Relation curves of acoustic emission energy ratio of limestone with loading stress ratio"

Fig.9

Relation curve of AE energy rate correlation dimension with loading stress ratio for different rock burst tendency"

null Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission. Standard for engineering classification of rock masses: [S].Beijing:China Planning Press,2015.
null Chen Bingrui, Wei Fanbo, Wang Rui, al et,2020.Failure mechanisms and precursory characteristics of deep buried granite in a tunnel in Southwest[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,39(3):469-479.
null Cong Yu, Feng Xiating, Zheng Yingren, al et,2016.Experimental study on acoustic emission failure precursors of marble under different stress paths[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,38(7):1193-1201.
null Ding Xin, Xiao Xiaochun, Xiangfeng Lü, al et,2018.Investigate on the fractal characteristics and acoustic emission of coalfracture[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,43(11):3080-3087.
null Feng X Y, Yu Y, Feng G L, al et,2016.Fractal behaviour of the microseismic energy associated with immediate rockbursts in deep,hard rock tunnels[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research,51:98-107.
null Feng Xiating, Xiao Yaxun, Feng Guangliang, al et,2019.Study on the development process of rock bursts[J].Chinese Jo-urnal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,38(4):649-673.
null Grassberger P, Pocaccia I,1983.Characterization of strange attractors[J].Physical Review Letters,50(5):346-349.
null Guo Jianqiang, Zhao Qing, Wang Junbao, al et,2015.Rockburst prediction based on elastic strain energy[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,34(9):164-171.
null Ji Hongguang, Wang Jicai, Shan Xiaoyun, al et,2001.Fractal characteristics of AE process of concrete material and application to the fracture analyses[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,20(6):801-804.
null Koerner R M, Mccabe W M, Lord A E,1981.Overview of acoustic emission monitoring of rock structures[J].Rock Mecha-nics and Rock Engineering,14(1):27-35.
null Li D J, Miao J L,2009. Acoustic emission and infrared characteristics of coal burst process[C]//Controlling Seismic Ha-zard & Sustainable Development of Deep Mines,Beijing:Chinese Society for Rock Mechanics & Engineering: 1341-1346.
null Liu Quansheng, Wei Lai, Lei Guangfeng, al et,2018.Experimental study on crack initiation crack damage strength and brittle parameters evaluation of sandstone[J].Chinese Jou-rnal of Geotechnical Engineering,40(10):1782-1789.
null Lu C P, Dou L M, Liu H, et a 1,2012.Case study on microseismic effect of coal and gas outburst process[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,53:101-110.
null Mandelbrot B B,1982.The Fractal Geometry of Nature[M].New York:W H.Freeman and Compan:25- 50.
null Niu W J, Feng X T, Xiao Y X, al et,2020.Identification of potential high-stress hazards in deep-buried hard rock tunnebased on microseismic information:a case study[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,(7):1-21.
null Pei Jianliang, Liu Jianfeng, Zhang Ru, al et,2010.Fractal study on spatial distribution of acoustic emission events of granite specimens under uniaxial compression[J].Journal of Sichuan University,42(6):51-55.
null Sun H, Liu X L, Zhu J B,2019.Correlational fractal characterisation of stress and acoustic emission during coal and rock failure under multilevel dynamic loading[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,117:1-10.
null Wang Chuangye, Chang Xinke, Liu YiLin,2018.Study on the fractal characteristics of acoustic emission sequence in the whole process of uniaxial compression fracture of different rocks[J].China Tungsten Industry,33(5):21-28.
null Wu Xianzhen, Liu Xiangxin, Liang Zhengzhao, al et,2012.Experimental study of fractal dimension of AE serials of different rocks under uniaxial compression[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,33(12):3561-3569.
null Xiao Yaxun, Feng Xiating, Chen Bingrui, al et,2015.Evolution of frequency spectrum during instant rockbursts in deep inoculation tunnel[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,36(4):1127-1134.
null Xu Dongqiang, Shan Xiaoyun, Zhang Yanbo,2000.Analysis of the mechanics of rock burst by rock AE and rock damage[J].Nonferrous Metals(Mining Section),(3):28-30,16.
null Xu J H, Kang Y, Liu F, al et,2021. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flawed granite under dynamic loading[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,142:106569. .
null Yang Jian, Wang Lianjun,2005.Study on mechanish of rock burst by acoustic emission testing[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,24(20):3796-3796.
null Yin Xiangang, Li Shulin, Tang Haiyan,2005.Study on strength fractal features of acoustic emission in process of rock failure[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,24(19):114-118.
null Zhang Chuanqing, Lu Jingjing, Chen Jun, al et,2017.Discussion on rock burst proneness indexes and their relation[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,38(5):1397-1404.
null Zhang Liming, Ren Mingyuan, Ma Shaoqiong, al et,2015.Acoustic emission and fractal characteristics of marble during unloading failure process[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,34(Suup.1):2862-2867.
null Zhang S W, Shou K J, Xian X F, al et,2018.Fractal characteristics and acoustic emission of anisotropic shale in Brazilian tests[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,71(1):298-308.
null Zhao Kui, Wang Gengfeng, Wang Xiaojun, al et,2008.Research on energy distributions and fractal characteristics of Kaiser signal of acoustic emission in rock[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,29(11):3082-3088.
null 长江水利委员会长江科学院,2015. 工程岩体分级标准: [S].北京:中国计划出版社.
null 陈炳瑞,魏凡博,王睿,等,2020.西南地区某深埋隧道花岗岩破坏机制与前兆特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,39(3):469-479.
null 丛宇,冯夏庭,郑颖人,等,2016.不同应力路径大理岩声发射破坏前兆的试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,38(71):193 -1201.
null 丁鑫,肖晓春,吕祥锋,等,2018.煤体破裂分形特征与声发射规律研究[J].煤炭学报,43(11):3080-3087.
null 冯夏庭,肖亚勋,丰光亮,等,2019.岩爆孕育过程研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,38(4):649-673.
null 郭建强,赵青,王军保,等,2015.基于弹性应变能岩爆倾向性评价方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,34(9):164-171.
null 纪洪广,王基才,单晓云,等,2001.混凝土材料声发射过程分形特征及其在断裂分析中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,20(6):801-804.
null 刘泉声,魏莱,雷广峰,等,2018.砂岩裂纹起裂损伤强度及脆性参数演化试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,40(10):1782-1789.
null 裴建良,刘建锋,张茹,等,2010.单轴压缩条件下花岗岩声发射事件空间分布的分维特征研究[J].四川大学学报,42(6):51-55.
null 王创业,常新科,刘沂琳,2018.不同岩石单轴压缩破裂全过程声发射序列分形特征研究[J].中国钨业,33(5):21-28.
null 吴贤振,刘祥鑫,梁正召,等,2012.不同岩石破裂全过程的声发射序列分形特征试验研究[J].岩土力学,33(12):3561-3569.
null 肖亚勋,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,等,2015.深埋隧洞即时型岩爆孕育过程的频谱演化特征[J].岩土力学,36(4):1127-1134.
null 徐东强,单晓云,张艳博,2000.用岩石声发射与岩石损伤分析岩爆发生机制[J].有色金属(矿山部分),(3):28-30,16.
null 杨健,王连俊,2005.岩爆机理声发射试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,24(20):3796-3796.
null 尹贤刚,李庶林,唐海燕,2005.岩石破坏声发射强度分形特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,14(19):114-118.
null 张传庆,卢景景,陈珺,等,2017.岩爆倾向性指标及其相互关系探讨[J].岩土力学,38( 5):1397-1404.
null 张黎明,任明远,马绍琼,等,2015.大理岩卸围压破坏全过程的声发射及分形特征[J].岩石力学与工程学报,34(增1):2862-2867.
null 赵奎,王更峰,王晓军,等,2008.岩石声发射Kaiser点信号频带能量分布和分形特征研究[J].岩土力学,29(11):3082-3088.
[1] Jianhua HU,Mengmeng GUO,Tan ZHOU,Tao ZHANG. Rock Mass Quality Evaluation Model Based on Improved Transfer Learning Algorithm [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(6): 826-833.
[2] Guoyan ZHAO,Chengkai DANG,Huanxin LIU,Yang LIU,Quri XIAO,Yang LI,Liqiang CHEN,Wenjie MAO. Evaluation of Mine Rockburst Tendency Based on the Distance Discrimination Analysis [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(5): 690-697.
[3] Jingkai JIA,Gun HUANG,Long WANG,Qiang CHENG,Libing ZHEN. Study on a New Method of Weakening End Effect in Uniaxial Compression Test [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(3): 382-391.
[4] Jianhua HU,Zhezhe DONG,Shaowei MA,Yaguang QIN,Xiao XU,Zhuan Dai. Seepage Characteristics of Damaged Rock Under Stress-Seepage Coupling [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(3): 355-363.
[5] Jin HUANG,Kewei LIU,Shaohu JIN. Numerical Simulation Study of High-strength Projectile Penetrating White Granite Target [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(3): 411-420.
[6] Rong LU,Fengshan MA,Jie ZHAO,Jie GUO,Jinzhong GU,Yeqiang HUANG. Analysis of Acoustic Emission Index Characteristics for Indoor Uniaxial Com-pression Test of Backfill [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(2): 218-225.
[7] Jingyu GUO,Chengzhi PU,Guicheng HE,Yilong LI,Shaofeng YANG,Jiajun ZENG. Fracture Test of Rock-like Materials with Cracks and Analysis of Acoustic Emission Characteristics at Static-Quasi-Static Loading Rates [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(6): 877-884.
[8] Zhiqin LIAO, Liguan WANG, Zhengxiang HE. Feature Extraction and Classification of Mine Microseismic Signals Based on EEMD and Correlation Dimension [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(4): 585-594.
[9] Chunde MA, Zelin LIU, Weibin XIE, Xin’ao WEI, Xinhao ZHAO, Shan LONG. Comparative Study of Stress Relief Method and Acoustic Emission Method in In-situ Stress Measurement in Deep Area of Xincheng Gold Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(3): 401-410.
[10] Renhao LI,Helong GU,Xibing LI,Kuikui HOU,Deming ZHU,Xi WANG. A PSO-RBF Neural Network Model for Rockburst Tendency Prediction [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(1): 134-141.
[11] Bing SUN,Yu LUO,Jiehui XIE,Sheng ZENG. Failure Test of N-type Combination Jointed Rock Mass Under Uniaxial Compression [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(4): 548-556.
[12] Shijiao YANG,Zhihui WANG. Numerical Simulation on Stability of Shallow-buried Goaf Group with Overlying Highway [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(4): 505-512.
[13] Chundi FENG,Rendong HUANG. Plastic Strain Analysis of Mineral Particles in Red Sandstone [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(4): 557-564.
[14] Yongfei YE,Yanan ZHANG,Shichao LI,Shirong CAO,Jianwen HAN,Xiaojun WANG. Acoustic Emission Characterization of Damage of Cemented Filling Under Cyclic Loading [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2018, 26(6): 819-825.
[15] CHENG Hao, XU Tao, ZHOU Guanglei, FANG Ke. Numerical Simulation of Fracture and Acoustic Emission Evolution of Hetero-geneous Rocks [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2018, 26(2): 170-178.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WANG Da-Beng, SONG Bing-Jian, HUI Ku-Meng. The Application of High Power IP Method for Searching Concealed Metallic Mine in Beishuiquan,Liaoning Province[J]. J4, 2010, 18(3): 76 -78 .
[2] LIU Qing-Guang, GAO Hai-Feng, HUANG Suo-Yang. The Application of PDA in Geology Department of Jiaojia Gold Mine[J]. J4, 2010, 18(3): 79 -82 .
[3] LIU Yu-Meng, LIU Nan, ZHANG Jie, SONG Yu-Bei, GONG Long-Ji, WANG Gang, LIU Xiao, ZHANG Hai-Fang. Study on Structure Characteristics and Ore-prospecting Direction of Yinggezhuang Gold Deposit[J]. J4, 2010, 18(6): 26 -29 .
[4] JIANG Qi, WANG Rong-Chao. [J]. J4, 2010, 18(4): 37 -40 .
[5] LIU Shu-Lin, SU Jian-Hua. [J]. J4, 2010, 18(4): 71 -74 .
[6] XU Zhongmin, ZHUANG Yukai, LUAN Zuochun. The Way of Part positive Crossing Matrix Separate out Factor Apply in Optimiz -ing Floatation Factor Test[J]. J4, 2008, 16(1): 7 -11 .
[7] YI Cun-Chang, CANG En-Guang. [J]. J4, 2010, 18(4): 58 -61 .
[8] LIU Hongjun, LIU Xiyou. The Fashion and Expand of Erguna—HunLunbeier Deep Faultage and The Controlling To Deposite[J]. J4, 2007, 15(1): 10 -13 .
[9] ZHAO Wenchuan ,PENG Suxia,LI Tao. Mode of Occurrence of the Vein and Foreground of Deep Ore Prospecting of Zhaishang Gold M ining Area[J]. J4, 2008, 16(2): 1 -4 .
[10] YI Youchang, MA Cai, LI Yuelong, PAN Tong, LUO Cairang, WANG Chunying. THE PLATE TECTONICS ENVIRONMENT AND METALLOGENESIS WITHIN QINGHAI[J]. J4, 2007, 15(1): 1 -9 .