img

Wechat

Adv. Search

Gold Science and Technology ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 401-410.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.03.157

• Mining Technology and Mine Management • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative Study of Stress Relief Method and Acoustic Emission Method in In-situ Stress Measurement in Deep Area of Xincheng Gold Mine

Chunde MA1,2(),Zelin LIU1(),Weibin XIE1,Xin’ao WEI1,Xinhao ZHAO1,Shan LONG1   

  1. 1.School of Source and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China
    2.Advanced Research Center,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China
  • Received:2019-09-17 Revised:2020-03-06 Online:2020-06-30 Published:2020-07-01
  • Contact: Zelin LIU E-mail:cd.ma@163.com;zelinl95@126.com

Abstract:

As the mining depth increases,the ground stress gradually increases,and rock burst phenomenon is likely to occur,which brings great damage to underground roadways and stope.Accurate ground stress magnitude and direction has good reference guidance value to underground engineering and can effectively avoid the occurrence of damage such as rock burst.In order to obtain the accurate ground stress distribution in the deep mining area of Xincheng gold mine,the stress relief method and acoustic emission method were used to measure the in-situ stress of the -830~-1 150 m deep mining area.The specific method of geostress measurement and the solution process of geostress measurement results were expounded.Subsequently,six measurement points of -830 m,-930 m and -1 030 m were measured using the stress relaxation method,and three measuring points in the three levels of -950 m,-1 050 m and -1 150 m were measured by AE method.Among them,the directional disturbance least squares multiple regression was used to improve the accuracy of the six stress components of the hole stress relief method,and the coordinates of the strain gauge were transformed into a space rectangular coordinate system by using the space coordinate transformation formula.The magnitude and direction of the ground stress were calculated by using the LUT-str three-dimensional geostress calculation program.The distribution law of the deep ground stress in the mining area under two different measurement modes was obtained,and the comparative analysis of the measurement results of the two methods were carried out.The results of the two measurement methods show that the horizontal principal stress and the vertical principal stress measured by the two measurement methods both increase linearly,the vertical principal stress is both close to the self-heavy stress of the overburden layer,and the deep stress of the Xincheng gold deposit is horizontal stress mainly,the maximum horizontal principal stress is NWW-SEE direction.The maximum horizontal principal stress measured by AE method is about 1.39 times of self-weight stress,and the stress relieving method is about 1.49 times.The maximum horizontal principal stress.vertical principal stress and horizontal minimum principal stress measured at -1 030 m level with errors of 12.1%,5.35%,and 13.46%,respectively,which have good consistency and provide good support for the exploitation and support design of deep mining areas.

Key words: stress relief method, acoustic emission method, deep mining area, in-situ stress, least square method, LUT-str

CLC Number: 

  • TD263

Fig.1

Steps of stress relief method"

Fig.2

Strain gauge probe(a) and schematic of final strain measure(b)"

Fig.3

Calculation process of in-situ stress"

Fig.4

Acoustic emission test chart"

Table 1

Strain value for solving in-situ stress"

测点编号最终应变值标定值
ε1ε2ε3ε4ε5ε6ε7ε8ε9ε10ε11ε12E/MPaμ
-830 m-1#4963211152501 027-4014298199985933754659 7810.17
-830 m-2#616229103215987-1823879429015995854258 7120.19
-895 m-3#8404101 1571 36967864546515962043339561156 2320.25
-940 m-4#859470354-65872574155119778649447774360 3400.18
-1030 m-5#-1 105947-3395571124929722199761 45647957 1910.16
-1030 m-6#8014914801 051759694-111545807191542-26760 9550.20

Table 2

Calculation results of three-dimensional principal stress of each measuring point by stress relief method"

测点编号最大主应力σ1中间主应力σ2最小主应力σ3
大小/MPa方位/(°)倾角/(°)大小/MPa方位/(°)倾角/(°)大小/MPa方位/(°)倾角/(°)
-830 m-1#33.18282.214.5621.6631.1176.1614.08191.1513.03
-830 m-2#32.64271.158.9321.7238.2275.3914.23179.3211.47
-895 m-3#36.14260.3415.5524.75131.3166.1519.43355.4117.61
-940 m-4#37.23269.4712.0328.09158.2059.5720.745.8427.49
-1030 m-5#42.90278.4013.7530.3135.2261.5413.99182.0324.40
-1030 m-6#42.52284.5813.0128.42110.5676.9324.3114.891.32

Table 3

Horizontal principal stress and vertical principal stress at each measuring point of stress relief method"

测点编号埋深/mσh max/MPaσh min/MPaσz/MPa
-830 m-1#86033.11014.46821.345
-830 m-2#86032.37414.52821.688
-895 m-3#92535.29219.94425.079
-940 m-4#97036.78822.34926.919
-1030 m-5#1 06042.11216.85628.234
-1030 m-6#1 06041.80324.31129.128

Fig.5

Iterative variation in each measurement points by stress relief method"

Fig.6

Stress regression curve of stress relief method"

Table 4

Results of acoustic emission test"

埋深/m垂直主应力/MPa水平向Kaiser点应力值/MPa自重应力σ/MPa最小水平主应力σh min/MPa最大水平主应力σh max/MPa最大水平主应力方向θ
45°90°
95024.8914.4717.4731.7825.6512.7833.46N106.58°E
1 05029.2218.5623.8340.4528.3517.1841.83N103.42°E
1 15032.0818.2424.1541.7631.0516.8643.13N103.13°W

Fig.7

Stress regression curve of acoustic emission method"

Table 5

Comparison of the measurement results tested by two methods"

方法名称埋深/mσ1/MPa误差δ1/%σ1方位角/(°)误差δ2/%σ2/MPa误差δ2/%σ3/MPa误差δ3/%
应力解除法94036.799.0590.5317.7326.927.5422.3542.82
声发射法95033.46106.5824.8912.78
应力解除法1 03041.960.3078.5131.3728.681.8820.5916.54
声发射法1 05041.83103.4229.2217.18
1 乔兰,张亦海,李远,等.深部花岗岩CSIRO地应力测量中高压双轴加卸载试验及非线弹性分析模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(1):40-48.
Qiao Lan,Zhang Yihai,Li Yuan,et al.A non-linear elastic model and high-level biaxial loading and unloading test for CSIRO in-situ stress measurement in deep granite[J].Chinese Jounal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(1):40-48.
2 聂胜陆,曹洪征.那林金矿地应力与井巷稳固性的关系探讨[J].黄金科学技术,2010,18(6):65-69.
Nie Shenglu,Cao Hongzheng.Discussion on the relationship between the geo-stress and gateway stability of Nalin gold mine[J].Gold Science and Technology,2010,18(6):65-69.
3 铁柱,朝宝楞,纪主.图古日格金矿地应力测量与分析[J].黄金科学技术,2014,22(6):73-76.
Tie Zhu,Chao Baoleng,Ji Zhu.In-situ stress measurement and analysis of Tugurige gold deposit[J].Gold Science and Technology,2014,22(6):73-76.
4 Zhou Y,Zhao Z,Liu C X,et al.Inversion analysis of crustal stress distribution law in gully geomorphic mining area[J].Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2019,37(5):4075-4087.
5 张东明,白鑫,齐消寒,等.含层理岩石的AE特征分析及基于Kaiser效应的地应力测试研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(1):87-97.
Zhang Dongming,Bai Xin,Qi Xiaohan,et al.Acoustic emission characteristics and in-situ stresses of bedding rock based on Kaiser effect[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2016,35(1):87-97.
6 王成虎.地应力主要测试和估算方法回顾与展望[J].地质论评,2014,60(5):971-996.
Wang Chenghu.Brief review and outlook of main estimate and measurement methods for in-situ stresses in rock mass[J].Geological Review,2014,60(5):971-996.
7 蔡美峰.地应力测量原理和方法的评述[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1993,12(3):275-283.
Cai Meifeng.Review of principles and methods for rock stress measurement[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,1993,12(3):275-283.
8 尤明庆.水压致裂法测量地应力方法的研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(3):350-353.
You Mingqing.Study on the geo-stresses measurement with hydro-fracture of borehole[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2005,27(3):350-353.
9 乔兰,欧阳振华,来兴平,等.三山岛金矿采空区地应力测量及其结果分析[J].北京科技大学学报,2004,26(6):569-571.
Qiao Lan,Ouyang Zhenhua,Lai Xingping,et al.In-situ stress measuring and its result analysis in Sanshandao gold mine of China[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing,2004,26(6):569-571.
10 姜永东,鲜学福,许江.岩石声发射Kaiser效应应用于地应力测试的研究[J].岩土力学,2005,26(6):946-950.
Jiang Yongdong,Xian Xuefu,Xu Jiang.Research on application of Kaiser effect of acoustic emission to measuring initial stress in rock mass[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2005,26(6):946-950.
11 刘允芳.水压致裂法三维地应力测量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1991,10(3):246-256.
Liu Yunfang.In-situ 3-dimensional stress measurements by hydraulic fracturing technique[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics Engineering,1991,10(3):246-256.
12 王建军.应用水压致裂法测量三维地应力的几个问题[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(2):229-233.
Wang Jianjun.Several problems in application of hydraulic fracturing method to in-situ 3D stress measurement[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2000,19(2):229-233.
13 蔡美峰,乔兰,于波,等.金川二矿区深部地应力测量及其分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(4):46-50.
Cai Meifeng,Qiao Lan,Yu Bo,et al.Results and analysis of in-situ stress measurement at deep position of No.2 mining area of Jinchuan nickel mine[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999,18(4):46-50.
14 蔡美峰,刘卫东,李远.玲珑金矿深部地应力测量及矿区地应力场分布规律[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(2):227-233.
Cai Meifeng,Liu Weidong,Li Yuan.In-situ stress measurement at deep position of Linglong gold mine and distribution law of in-situ stress field in mine area[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(2):227-233.
15 李利峰,邹正盛,张庆.声发射Kaiser效应在地应力测量中的应用现状[J].煤田地质与勘探,2011,39(1):41-45,51.
Li Lifeng,Zou Zhengsheng,Zhang Qing.Current situation of the study on Kaiser effect of rock acoustic emission in in-situ stress measurement[J].Coal Geology and Exploration,2011,39(1):41-45,51.
16 付小敏,王旭东.利用岩石声发射测试地应力数据处理方法的研究[J].实验室研究与探索,2007,26(11):282-285.
Fu Xiaomin,Wang Xudong.The research on data processing about in-situ stress measurement with AE[J].Research and Exploration in Laboratory,2007,26(11):282-285.
17 陈枫,饶秋华,徐纪成,等.应变解除法原理及其在大红山铁矿地应力测量中的应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,38(3):545-550.
Chen Feng,Rao Qiuhua,Xu Jicheng,et al.Principle of strain release method and its application to the in-situ stress measurement in Dahongshan iron mine[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2007,38(3):545-550.
18 杨曙光.超定方程组残量极小化的定向扰动最小二乘法[J].武汉大学学报(自然科学版),1990(3):17-25.
Yang Shuguang.Directional perturbation least-squares method of minimizing the residual of an overdetermined system of linear equations[J].Journal of Wuhan University(Natural Science Edition),1990(3):17-25.
19 闫振雄,郭奇峰,王培涛.空心包体应变计地应力分量计算方法及应用[J].岩土力学,2018,39(2):715-721.
Yan Zhenxiong,Guo Qifeng,Wang Peitao.Calculation and application of in-situ stress components in hollow inclusion measurement[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,39(2):715-721.
20 闫振雄,王培涛.空心包体应变计地应力计算方法的探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(增1):3568-3574.
Yan Zhenxiong,Wang Peitao.Insight into in-situ stress calculation applied in hollow inclusion measurement[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2018,37(Supp.1):3568-3574.
21 陈颙.声发射技术在岩石力学研究中的应用[J].地球物理学报,1977,20(4):312-322.
Chen Yong.Application of acoustic emission techniques to rock mechanics research[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics Sinica,1977,20(4):312-322.
[1] Yezhen XIE,Ping CAO,Haoran CHEN. Three-dimensional In-situ Stress Measurement and Optimization of Roadway Layout in Lanniping Copper Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(6): 862-870.
[2] TIE Zhu,CHAO Baoleng,JI Zhu. In-situ Stress Measurement and Analysis of Tugurige Gold Deposit [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2014, 22(6): 73-76.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHEN Fangfang,ZHANG Yifei,XUE Guang. Disposal to Pollution and Resource Utilization to Waste for Gold Smelting[J]. J4, 2011, 19(2): 67 -73 .
[2] WANG Jiqing,WANG Ping,ZHAO Xiaojuan,LIN Xiangwei. Study and Apply on Comprehensive Recovery of Tailing Ore of Gold Flotation[J]. J4, 2010, 18(5): 87 -89 .
[3] CHEN Jianhong,QIN Caoyuan,DENG Dongsheng. Risk Assessment of Bedded Rock Roadway Roof Fall Based on AHP and Matter-Element TOPSIS Method[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2017, 25(1): 55 -60 .
[4] PENG Jianping,SHEN Shubao. [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2016, 24(4): 133 -136 .
[5] SONG Yingxin,SONG Mingchun,DING Zhengjiang,WEI Xufeng,XU Shaohui,LI Jie,TAN Xianfeng,LI Shiyong,ZHANG Zhaolu,JIAO Xiumei,HU Hong,CAO Jia. Major Advances on Deep Prospecting in Jiaodong Gold Ore Cluster and Its Metallogenic Characteristics[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2017, 25(3): 4 -18 .
[6] XIE Minxiong,LI Zhengyao,LIN Shuyong,CHI Xiaopeng,QI Chuanduo. Research on the Technology Innovation and Application of Improving Performance of Grinding System in Concentrator [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2012, 20(6): 65 -68 .
[7] WANG Wenjun,XIAO Qingfei,KANG Huaibin,ZHAN Xinshun,WU Qiming,XIAO Hun. Optimization Experiment Research on the Ball Charge Characteristics of MQG3660 Grate-type Ball Mill in a Gold Mine[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2016, 24(2): 90 -94 .
[8] HU Xiaokun,SONG Huichang,LIU Qing. [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2016, 24(5): 94 -101 .
[9] . [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 0, (): 0 .
[10] MA Fengshan,GUO Jie,LI Kepeng,LU Rong,ZHANG Hongxun,LI Wei. Monitoring and Research for the Deformation of Mine Backfill and Roof Surrounding Rock when Exploiting Sanshandao Seabed Gold Mine[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2016, 24(4): 66 -72 .