img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索

黄金科学技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 763-772.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2023.05.037

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

分层尾砂胶结充填体力学特性及优化试验研究

海龙(),鲍荣涛(),谭世林,房祥龙   

  1. 辽宁工程技术大学力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123032
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-02 修回日期:2023-04-08 出版日期:2023-10-31 发布日期:2023-11-21
  • 通讯作者: 鲍荣涛 E-mail:hailong8901@163.com;brt_ljn20@163.com
  • 作者简介:海龙(1975-),男,辽宁阜新人,副教授,从事固体废弃物综合利用及矿山采空区充填研究工作。hailong8901@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“随机扰动下深部软岩渗流—蠕变损伤破裂耦合机理研究”(52274084)

Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Layered Tailing Sand Cemented Backfill and Optimization

Long HAI(),Rongtao BAO(),Shilin TAN,Xianglong FANG   

  1. School of Mechanics and Engineering,Liaoning Technical University,Fuxin 123032,Liaoning,China
  • Received:2023-03-02 Revised:2023-04-08 Online:2023-10-31 Published:2023-11-21
  • Contact: Rongtao BAO E-mail:hailong8901@163.com;brt_ljn20@163.com

摘要:

在尾砂胶结充填采空区过程中,充填操作的不连续会造成充填体在2次充填的界面处发生分层现象。为研究分层尾砂胶结充填体力学特性,改善分层的劣化影响,引入混凝土学中处理新旧混凝土界面的喷砂法,制作完整不分层、界面自然分层和界面喷砂处理分层3种分层类型的充填体试件,设置灰砂比分别为1∶4、1∶6和1∶8,在养护龄期为3 d、7 d、14 d和28 d条件下对试件进行单轴压缩试验。结果表明:(1)分层现象降低了尾砂胶结充填体的单轴抗压强度,折减率区间为1.41%~19.09%,且随养护龄期和灰砂比的增加折减率呈指数函数增长;界面喷砂处理提高了尾砂胶结充填体的单轴抗压强度,增益率区间为1.92%~16.26%,增益率随着灰砂比的增加而增大,且在养护早期增益更明显。(2)充填体的弹性模量随养护龄期的增加呈指数函数增长,分层充填体弹性模量的折减随养护龄期和灰砂比的增加均呈增大趋势。(3)充填体的峰后强度曲线随灰砂比的降低表现出更优的峰后延性,且随养护龄期的增加愈加明显;不同分层类型充填体的峰后延性优劣顺序为:界面喷砂处理分层>界面自然分层>完整不分层。(4)分层充填体的破坏形式主要表现为拉张破坏和共轭剪切破坏,喷砂处理能够改善力在分层面上的传递方式。

关键词: 尾砂胶结充填体, 分层特性, 界面处理, 力学性能, 峰后延性, 破坏形式

Abstract:

In the process of tailing cemented filling goaf,the discontinuity of the filling operation causes delamination of the filling body at the interface of the two fillings.In order to study the mechanical properties of the layered tailing cemented backfill and improve the deterioration effect of stratification,three types of delaminated backfill specimens,namely,intact non-delaminated,interface natural delamination,and interface sandblasted delamination,were produced.Each delamination type contains three material ratios of 1∶4,1∶6,and 1∶8 for ash-sand ratio,and uniaxial compression tests were conducted on specimens at curing ages of 3 d,7 d,14 d and 28 d to compare and analyze the deformation and damage characteristics of specimens with different delamination characteristics,different material ratios,and different curing ages.The results show that:(1) The delamination phenomenon significantly affects the mechanical properties of the tailing sand cemented backfill,considerably reducing the uniaxial compressive strength and the elastic modulus.Comparing the intact unstratified,naturally stratified specimens,the strength reduction rate caused by stratification increase ranged from 1.41% to 19.09% and exponentially with the increase of the curing age and ash-sand ratio.It indicates that the more significant the ash-sand proportion and the longer the maintenance age,the more pronounced the weakening effect of delamination of the backfill.Comparing the naturally delaminated and sandblasted delaminated specimens,the strength gain rate due to sandblasted delamination ranges from 1.92% to 16.26%,which increases with the increase of the ash-sand ratio,decreases firstly with the rise of the curing age and then remains flat and stable,and shows a higher strength gain rate in the early curing period.(2) The modulus of elasticity of the three-layered backfill types increases exponentially with the maintenance age.The discount of the modulus of elasticity of the natural layering relative to the complete layering increases with the rise in the maintenance age and decreases with the decrease of the gray sand ratio.The modulus of elasticity of the sandblasted layering relative to the natural layering only has a relatively apparent increase at 3 d,and the rest of the age is basically at the same level.(3) Using the rate of decrease of the post-peak strength curve as the ductility evaluation criterion,the post-peak strength curves of the three-layered types of backfill show better post-peak ductility with the decrease of ash-sand ratio,and it becomes more and more evident with the increase of maintenance age.The post-peak ductility performance of different layered types of backfill is in the order of interface sandblasted layered>interface natural layered>complete non-layered.(4)The damage of the delami-nated backfill is mainly in the form of tensile damage and conjugate shear damage,and the delamination surface makes part of the vertical compressive stress transformed into horizontal tensile stress,and the cracks inside the specimen are concentrated in the soft delamination surface,which makes the compressive strength of the backfill reduced.Sandblasting treatment can improve force transmission on the delamination surface to a certain extent.In order to reduce the degradation of the material’s mechanical properties by delamination,sandblasting,and other roughening treatment can be carried out on the last filling surface at the interval of the second filling.

Key words: tailing sand cemented backfill, characteristics of delamination, interface treatment, mechanical property, post-peak ductility, damage form

中图分类号: 

  • TD853

图1

尾砂粒径分布曲线"

表1

尾砂的化学成分"

类别含量类别含量
SiO273.93MgO3.48
Fe2O313.18SO30.14
CaO5.05其他1.04
Al2O33.18

图2

试验流程"

表2

充填体试件的单轴抗压强度"

试件类型

(灰砂比+分层类型)

不同养护龄期充填体单轴抗压强度/MPa
3 d7 d14 d28 d
1∶4,完整不分层1.6502.3713.5175.175
1∶4,自然分层1.3651.9402.8614.178
1∶4,喷砂处理分层1.6012.0773.0454.446
1∶6,完整不分层0.9531.5852.3563.431
1∶6,自然分层0.8911.4722.1583.114
1∶6,喷砂处理分层0.9431.5232.2233.210
1∶8,完整不分层0.5660.8871.4241.966
1∶8,自然分层0.5580.8621.3501.838
1∶8,喷砂处理分层0.5720.8811.3761.875

图3

不同养护龄期充填体试件的强度折减率different curing ages"

图4

不同灰砂比充填体试件的强度折减率"

图5

不同养护龄期充填体试件的强度增益率different curing ages"

图6

不同灰砂比充填体试件的强度增益率different ash-sand ratios"

表3

充填体试件的弹性模量"

试件类型

(灰砂比+分层类型)

不同养护龄期充填体试件的弹性模量/MPa
3 d7 d14 d28 d
1∶4,完整不分层152.81200.37351.84421.27
1∶4,自然分层100.86172.75219.48223.74
1∶4,喷砂处理分层132.32177.39227.00245.38
1∶6,完整不分层83.23108.97212.20285.07
1∶6,自然分层72.33102.50173.79202.64
1∶6,喷砂处理分层82.29106.02177.15210.12
1∶8,完整不分层59.1771.74139.37199.97
1∶8,自然分层37.1261.6881.49135.34
1∶8,喷砂处理分层45.1866.5382.13143.52

图7

不同灰砂比充填体试件的弹性模量"

图8

不同养护龄期充填体试件的应力—应变曲线"

图9

不同分层类型充填体试件的破坏形式"

Cao Shuai, Song Weidong, Xue Gaili,et al,2015.Tests of strength reduction of cemented tailings filling considering layering character[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,36(10):2869-2876.
Cheng Aiping, Dai Shunyi, Zhang Yushan,et al,2019.Study on size effect of damage evolution of cemented backfill[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,38(Supp.1):3053-3060.
Fang Zhi, Wu Rongjie, Pei Bingzhi,et al,2021.Size effect of the shear performance on the bonding interface between new and old concrete[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,34(11):92-103.
Fu Jianxin, Du Cuifeng, Song Weidong,2014.Strength sensitivity and failure mechanism of full tailings cemented backfills[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing,36(9):1149-1157.
Hou Yongqiang, Yin Shenghua, Cao Yong,et al,2022.Stress-strain relationship and damge constitutive model of cemented tailings backfill under uniaxial compression[J].Materials Reports,36(16):179-186.
Liu Guangsheng, Yang Xiaocong, Guo Lijie,2019.Models of three-dimensional arching stress and strength requirement for the backfill in open stoping with subsequent backfill mining[J].Journal of China Coal Society,44(5):1391-1403.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for soil test method: [S].Beijing:China Planning Press.
Qi C C, Guo L, Wu Y,et al,2022.Stability evaluation of layered backfill considering filling interval,backfill strength and creep behavior[J].Minerals,12(2):271-271.
Qiao D P, Cheng W H, Xie J C,et al,2019.Analysis of the influence of gradation on the strength of a cemented filling body and the cementation strength model[J].Integrated Ferroelectrics,199(1):12-21.
Sari M, Yilmaz E, Kasap T,et al,2022.Strength and microstructure evolution in cemented mine backfill with low and high pH pyritic tailings:Effect of mineral admixtures[J].Construction and Building Materials,328:127109.1.
Spyropoulos E, Nawaz B, Ojo A,et al,2021.Stability assessment of obliquely-bedded rock cuts using multi-prong procedures-case study[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,833(1):012042.DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012042 .
doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012042
Su Shuai,2019.Experimental Study on Strength Characteristics of Fulltailings-Cemented Filling Body/Layered Cemented Backfill[D].Hengyang:University of South China.
Sun Demin, Ren Jianping, Jiao Huazhe,et al,2012.Study on the properties of the unclassified tailings cemented backfill materials in a mine[J].Metal Mine,41(3):6-9,14.
Tang Yanan, Fu Jianxin, Song Weidong,et al,2020.Mechanical properties and crack evolution of interbedded cemented tailings backfill[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering,42(10):1286-1298.
Wang J, Song W D, Cao S,et al,2019.Mechanical properties and failure modes of stratified backfill under triaxial cyclic loading and unloading[J].International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,29(5):809-814.
Wang Y M, Wu J Y, Pu H,et al,2022.Effect of interface geometric parameters on the mechanical properties and damage evolution of layered cemented gangue backfill:Experiments and models[J].Construction and Building Materials,349:1-17.
Wei Xiaoming, Li Changhong, Zhang Lixin,et al,2017.The ratio parameter design and engineering optimization of high stage delayed cemented backfill[J].Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering,34(3):580-586,593.
Yan Rongfu, Liu Jiaming, Yin Shenghua,et al,2022.Effect of polypropylene fiber and coarse aggregate on the ductility and fluidity of cemented tailings backfill[J].Journal of Central South University,29(2):515-527.
Yang Jian, Yin Tubing, Liu Kewei,et al,2017.Study on factors affecting strength of tailings backfill body with response surface method[J].China Safety Science Journal,27(12):103-109.
Yang L J, Hou C, Zhu W C,et al,2022.Monitoring the failure process of cemented paste backfill at different curing times by using a digital image correlation technique[J].Construction and Building Materials,346:1-11.
Zhang Jusong,2011.Concrete Science[M].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology Press.
Zhao Kang, Huang Ming, Yan Yajing,et al,2021.Mechanical properties and synergistic deformation characteristics of tailings cemented filling assembled material body with different cement-tailings ratios[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,40(Supp.1):2781-2789.
Zhao Zhifang,2003.Research on Bonding Mechanism of New and Old Concrete and Its Engineering Application[M].Beijing:China Water & Power Press.
曹帅,宋卫东,薛改利,等,2015.考虑分层特性的尾砂胶结充填体强度折减试验研究[J].岩土力学,36(10):2869-2876.
程爱平,戴顺意,张玉山,等,2019.胶结充填体损伤演化尺寸效应研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,38(增1):3053-3060.
方志,吴荣杰,裴炳志,等,2021.新旧混凝土结合面抗剪性能的尺寸效应[J].中国公路学报,34(11):92-103.
付建新,杜翠凤,宋卫东,2014.全尾砂胶结充填体的强度敏感性及破坏机制[J].北京科技大学学报,36(9):1149-1157.
侯永强,尹升华,曹永,等,2022.尾砂胶结充填体单轴受压应力—应变关系及其损伤本构模型[J].材料导报,36(16):179-186.
刘光生,杨小聪,郭利杰,2019.阶段空场嗣后充填体三维拱应力及强度需求模型[J].煤炭学报,44(5):1391-1403.
苏帅,2019.全尾砂胶结充填体/分层胶结充填体强度特性实验研究[D].衡阳:南华大学.
孙德民,任建平,焦华喆,等,2012.某矿全尾砂胶结充填物料性能研究[J].金属矿山,41(3):6-9,14.
唐亚男,付建新,宋卫东,等,2020.分层胶结充填体力学特性及裂纹演化规律[J].工程科学学报,42(10):1286-1298.
魏晓明,李长洪,张立新,等,2017.高阶段嗣后胶结充填体配比参数设计及工程优化[J].采矿与安全工程学报,34(3):580-586,593.
严荣富,刘家明,尹升华,等,2022.聚丙烯纤维和粗骨料对尾砂胶结充填体延性和流动性的影响[J].中南大学学报,29(2):515-527.
杨坚,尹土兵,刘科伟,等,2017.全尾砂胶结充填体强度影响因素响应面法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,27(12):103-109.
张巨松,2011.混凝土学[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社.
赵康,黄明,严雅静,等,2021.不同灰砂比尾砂胶结充填材料组合体力学特性及协同变形研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,40(增1):2781-2789.
赵志方,2003.新老混凝土粘结机理研究与工程应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社.
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准: [S].北京:中国计划出版社.
[1] 丁琴, 陶明, 李响. 地聚合物混凝土配比及力学性能研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022, 30(2): 243-253.
[2] 王新民, 赵茂阳, 荣帅, 王浩, 张云海. APAM对全尾砂胶结充填体早期强度影响研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2018, 26(3): 305-311.
[3] 马凤山,李克蓬,杜云龙,侯成录,李威,张国栋 . 三山岛金矿海底开采F1断裂防突结构可能的破坏形式分析 [J]. 黄金科学技术, 2017, 25(5): 47-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!