img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1112/TF 
  • ISSN 1005-2518 
  • 创刊于1988年
高级检索
矿产勘查与资源评价

基于组合赋权TOPSIS法的采场结构参数优选

  • 万孝衡 ,
  • 王新民 ,
  • 朱阳亚 ,
  • 姜志良 ,
  • 陈秋松
展开
  • 中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南  长沙   410083
万孝衡(1989-),男,湖南衡阳人,硕士研究生,从事采矿及充填技术工作.wanxiaoheng@126.com

收稿日期: 2014-06-03

  修回日期: 2014-08-10

  网络出版日期: 2015-01-22

Optimization of the Stope Structural Parameters Based on Empowerment Combination TOPSIS

  • WAN Xiaoheng ,
  • WANG Xinmin ,
  • ZHU Yangya ,
  • JIANG Zhiliang ,
  • CHEN Qiusong
Expand
  • School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha   410083,Hunan,China

Received date: 2014-06-03

  Revised date: 2014-08-10

  Online published: 2015-01-22

摘要

为解决运用数值分析方法获得最优采场结构参数中权重确定的难点,提出了一种基于组合赋权的逼近理想解的排序法(TOPSIS)综合评判方法。综合考虑影响采场结构参数中经济、技术、安全三大类因素,运用层次分析原理建立采场结构参数的评判体系,采用熵权法和层次分析法确定采场结构参数中各指标的组合权重,计算出各采场结构参数方案基于评判指标的综合优越度,实现采场结构参数的优选。最后,以湖南某矿山的采场结构参数选择为实例,建立了9种备选方案,得出5种安全可行方案的优越度分别为:方案2,40.8%;方案3,70.2%;方案5,26.8%;方案6,52.9%;方案8,4.7%,从而确定方案3最优。

本文引用格式

万孝衡 , 王新民 , 朱阳亚 , 姜志良 , 陈秋松 . 基于组合赋权TOPSIS法的采场结构参数优选[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2014 , 22(5) : 69 -73 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2014.05.069

Abstract

To solve the problem of the difficulty using numerical analysis method to obtain the optimal stope structure parameters of the weight,we propose a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) based on combination of empowerment comprehensive evaluation method.Considering influence of stope structure parameters of the three categories of factors,such as economy,technology and safety.We establish the evaluation system of a stope structure parameters by the principle of analytic hierarchy process,determine  combination and weights of each indicator using the entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP),and calculate the superior degrees of schemes based on the comprehensive evaluation index,finally,realizing,optimization of stope structure parameters.Taking the example of a mine in Hunan Province,nine schemes,fitting an orthogonal model,were tested,five of the nine schemes were assessed by empowerment combination TOPSIS evaluation model.The synthetic superior degrees of schemes are 40.8%,70.2%,26.8%,52.9% and 4.7% for the second,third,fifth,sixth and eighth ones,respectively,and the third scheme becomes the best.

参考文献

[1] 董蕾.采动结构参数优化设计及可靠度分析[D].长沙:中南大学, 2010.
[2] 李启月,陈亮,潭勇,等.基于ANSYS的二步采场分段开挖过程模拟及稳定性分析[J].科技导报,2013,31 (22):44-49.
[3] ZHU Shuyun,JIAN Zhenquan,HOU Hongliang,et al.Analytical model and application of stress distribution on  mining coal floor[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2008,18 (1):13-17.
[4] Saaty T L,Rogers P C,Pell R.Portfolio selection through hierarchies[J].The Journal of Portfolio Management,1980,6(3):16-21.
[5] 李俊芳,吴小萍.基于AHP-FUZZY多层次评判的城市轨道交通线网规划方案综合评价[J].武汉理工大学报,2007,4(2):205-208.
[6] 刘星魁,朱红青,张圣柱,等.基于折衷权重的多层次安全性评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):92-96.
[7] Saaty T L.Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].Pittsburgh,PA:RWS,1994.
[8] 王新民,李洁慧,张钦礼,等.基于FAHP的采场结构参数优化研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2012,39 (2):163-168.
[9] 谢本贤,陈沅江,史秀志.深部岩体工程围岩质量评价的IRMR法研究[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2007,38(5):987-992.
[10] 周科平,翟建波,高峰,等.缓倾斜薄矿体采场伪倾斜布置及参数优化研究[J].广西大学学报:自然科学版,2012,2(37):376-381.

文章导航

/