img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索

黄金科学技术 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 63-67.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2015.04.063

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于实际冲击能量指数(W)的岩爆预测技术研究

饶运章,李雪珍*   

  1. 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院,江西  赣州   341000
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-15 修回日期:2015-06-23 出版日期:2015-08-28 发布日期:2015-11-16
  • 通讯作者: 李雪珍(1990-),女,广西桂林人,硕士研究生,从事采矿及爆破工程研究工作。 E-mail:2649704965@qq.com
  • 作者简介:饶运章(1963-),男,江西会昌人,教授,从事采矿、爆破工程和环境岩土方面的教学科研工作。raoyunzhang@sohu.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目“盲硫金属矿井硫化矿尘爆炸机理与爆炸参教研究”(编号:51364010)资助

Research on Rock Burst Prediction Technology based on the Actual Impact Energy Index(W)

RAO Yunzhang,LI Xuezhen   

  1. School of Resources and Engineering,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou    341000,Jiangxi,China
  • Received:2015-05-15 Revised:2015-06-23 Online:2015-08-28 Published:2015-11-16

摘要:

岩爆是深井矿山开采过程中常见的一种地质灾害。岩爆的发生不仅威胁到井下人员、设备和材料的安全,还会破坏地下采场结构。为了预防岩爆的危害,可从岩爆的倾向性、发生强度及位置进行研究。在分析岩石冲击能量指数(WCF)和弹性变形能指数(WET)的基础上,发现WCF存在夸大实际岩体中存储的弹性变形能的问题,因此提出实际冲击能量指数(W)。构建以实际冲击能量指数(W)为主,弹性变形能指数(WET)和岩石脆性指数(K)为辅的爆脱型岩爆预测新技术,将其运用于冬瓜山铜矿的矿井岩爆预测,所得预测结果证明实际冲击能量指数(W)比岩石冲击能量指数(WCF)能更好地预测矿山的岩爆问题,预测效果更加真实、可靠,表明构建的岩爆预测新技术有效。

关键词: 岩爆预测技术, 实际冲击能量指数, 弹性变形能指数, 岩石脆性指数

Abstract:

Rock burst is a kind of common geological disasters in deep mine in the process of mining,which is not only threatens the safety of underground personnel,equipment,materials,but also can lead to the destruction of underground stope structure.The rock burst hazard can be prevented by researching and analyzing the tendency,intensity and location of the rock burst.Based on the analysis of the impact energy index of rock WCF and the elastic deformation energy index of rock WET,we found the question that WCF exaggerated the quantity of actually stored in the elastic deformation energy of rock.So the paper put forward the actual impact energy index W,and build up a new rock burst prediction technology rely on the actual impact energy index W-based,the elastic deformation energy index WET and rock brittleness index K supplemented.The prediction technology is applied  to forecast the rock burst in Dongguashan copper mine,and the results show that using the W is better than WCF in forecast rock burst problem,in addition,the prediction results were more realistic and reliable.It means that the new rock burst prediction technology is effective.

Key words: rock burst prediction technology, actual impact energy index, elastic deformation energy index, rock brittleness index

中图分类号: 

  • TU458

[1] Konicek P,koncny P,Ptacek J.Destress rock blasting as a rockburst control technique[M]//Qian Q H,Zhou Y X.Harmonising Rock Engineering and Environment.Londun:Taylor & Francis Group,2011:1221-1226.
[2] 宫凤强,李夕兵,张伟.基于Bayes判别分析方法的地下工程岩爆发生及烈度分级预测[J].岩土力学,2010,31(增1):370-377,387.
[3] 贾义鹏,吕庆,尚岳全,等.基于证据理论的岩爆预测[J].岩土工程学报,2014,3(6):1079-1086.
[4] 陈祥,孙进忠,张杰坤,等.岩爆的判别指标和分级标准及可拓综合判别方法[J].土木工程学报,2009,1(9):82-88.
[5] Yan P,Zhao Z,Lu W,et al.Mitigation of rock burst events by blasting techniques during deep-tunnel excavation[J].Engineering Geology,2015,188(1):126-136.
[6] 杨健,武雄.岩爆综合预测评价方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(3):411-416.
[7] 张镜剑,傅冰骏.岩爆及其判据和防治[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(10):2034-2042.
[8] 王斌,李夕兵,马春德,等.岩爆灾害控制的动静组合支护原理及初步应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(6):1169-1178.
[9] 宫凤强,李夕兵.岩爆发生和烈度分级预测的距离判别方法及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(5):1012-1018.
[10] 王吉亮,陈剑平,杨静,等.岩爆等级判定的距离判别分析方法及应用[J].岩土力学,2009,30(7):2203-2208.
[11] Kidybinski A.Bursting liability indices of coal[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences& Geomechanics Abstracts,1981,18(4):295-304.
[12] 冯涛,潘长良,王宏图,等.测定岩爆岩石弹性变形能量指数的新方法[J].中国有色金属学报,1998,3(2):165-168.
[13] 唐礼忠,王文星.一种新的岩爆倾向性指标[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(6):874-878.
[14] Singh M,Raj A,Singh B.Modified Mohr-Coulomb criterion for non-linear triaxial strength of jointed rocks[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2011,48(4):546-555.
[15] 李宝富,齐利伟,任永康,等.千秋煤矿煤的单轴抗压强度与冲击能量指数关系[J].煤炭工程,2011,(12):68-70.
[16] 唐礼忠,潘长良,谢学斌.深埋硬岩矿床岩爆控制研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(7):1067-1071.
[17] 齐庆新,彭永伟,李宏艳,等.煤岩冲击倾向性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(增1):2736-2742.

[1] 王进,宫凤强. 红砂岩单轴压缩试验的率效应研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2018, 26(1): 56-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!