img

Wechat

  • CN 62-1112/TF 
  • ISSN 1005-2518 
  • Founded in 1988
Adv. Search

Synthetic Judgement for Filling Scheme Optimization Based on AHP and TPOSIS Methods

  • WANG Xinmin ,
  • FAN Biao ,
  • ZHANG Deming ,
  • LI Shuai
Expand
  • School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha    410083,Hunan,China

Received date: 2016-05-05

  Revised date: 2016-06-12

  Online published: 2016-12-27

Supported by

中南大学“创新驱动计划”项目“智能化清洁化现代矿业工程理论与技术”(编号:2015CX005)资助

Abstract

In order to make a synthetic assessment about filling schemes optimization,the synthetic assessment index system of filling scheme was established according to the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) and TOPSIS methods.Based on the four filling schemes optimization in a metal mine,considering the economic,technical,security and etc,which influenced the evaluation indexes(filling difficulty level,roof-contacted filling level,settlement of filling body,strength of filling body,etc) of filling schemes,the influence factor indexes of the filling schemes were transformed into multi-factor decision matrix;the weight of the influence factors matrix were gotten according to the AHP method,and then,the AHP-TOPSIS multi-factor decision model was established with the fundamental theory of TOPSIS,and the synthetic superior degree of the four filling schemes were obtained.The research results show that the synthetic superior degree of filling schemes are 36.2%,85.2%,57.6%,32.0%,respectively,according to the method,and thus determine the second scheme(consolidated filling method) is the optimal one.The optimization scheme is consistent with an actual mining,filling effect is good.Practical application shows that the decision model provides a new method to the filling schemes optimization.

Cite this article

WANG Xinmin , FAN Biao , ZHANG Deming , LI Shuai . Synthetic Judgement for Filling Scheme Optimization Based on AHP and TPOSIS Methods[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2016 , 24(5) : 1 -6 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2016.05.001

References

[1] 王新民,古德生,张钦礼.深井矿山充填理论与管道输送技术[M].长沙:中南大学出版社,2010:1-6.
[2] 杨波,杨任教,王富林.基于ANSYS/FLOTRAN的高浓度全尾砂胶结充填管道输送数值模拟研究[J].黄金科学技术,2015,23(15):60-65.
[3] 许家林,轩大洋,朱卫兵.充填采煤技术现状与展望[J].采矿技术,2011,11(3):24-30.
[4] 牟振山,刘学胜,李和平,等.注浆胶结矿柱充填工艺在河西金矿的研究[J].黄金科学技术,2006,14(3):23-25.
[5] 王新民,赵建文,张钦礼.露天转地下最佳开采模式[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(4):1435-1439.
[6] 王新民,秦健春,张钦礼.基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的姑山驻留矿采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(3):1132-1137.
[7] 王新民,赵彬,张钦礼.基于层次分析法和模糊数学的采矿方法选择[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,39(5):875-880.
[8] 谷新建,柴红保.应用突变评价理论选择采矿方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,7(7):13-15.
[9] 赵彬,王新民,史良贵,等.基于BP神经网络的爆破参数优选[J].矿冶工程,2009,29(4):24-27.
[10] 陈婷婷,宋永发.基于AHP-TOPSIS的地铁车站施工方案比选[J].工程管理学报,2012,26(5):33-36.
[11] 龚剑,胡乃联,崔翔.基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的岩爆倾向性预测[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,33(7):1443-1448.
[12] Dagdeviren M,Yavuz S,Kilinc N.Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment[J].Expert Systems with Application,2009,36(4):143-8151.
[13] 杨皓翔,梁川,侯小波.改进的TOPSIS模型在地下水水质评价中的应用[J].南水北调与水利科技,2012,10(5):51-55.
[14] 王新民,李洁慧,张钦礼.基于FAHP的采场结构参数优化研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2010,39(2):163-168.
[15] 黄贯虹,方刚.系统工程方法与应用[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,2005:45-48.
[16] 于秀金,张皓斐.一种将AHF和TOPSIS融合的决策方法[J].电脑信息与技术,2010,18(6):28-31.
[17] 许玖平,吴巍.多属性决策的理论与方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
[18] 谢本贤,陈沅江,史秀志.深部岩体工程围岩质量评价的IRMR法研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,38(5):987-992.
[19] 张钦礼,肖崇春,陈秋松,等.某矿山最佳充填站站址方案选择[J].科技导报,2013,31(19):39-44.

Outlines

/