img

Wechat

  • CN 62-1112/TF 
  • ISSN 1005-2518 
  • Founded in 1988
Adv. Search

Optimization of the Stope Structural Parameters Based on Empowerment Combination TOPSIS

  • WAN Xiaoheng ,
  • WANG Xinmin ,
  • ZHU Yangya ,
  • JIANG Zhiliang ,
  • CHEN Qiusong
Expand
  • School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha   410083,Hunan,China

Received date: 2014-06-03

  Revised date: 2014-08-10

  Online published: 2015-01-22

Abstract

To solve the problem of the difficulty using numerical analysis method to obtain the optimal stope structure parameters of the weight,we propose a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) based on combination of empowerment comprehensive evaluation method.Considering influence of stope structure parameters of the three categories of factors,such as economy,technology and safety.We establish the evaluation system of a stope structure parameters by the principle of analytic hierarchy process,determine  combination and weights of each indicator using the entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP),and calculate the superior degrees of schemes based on the comprehensive evaluation index,finally,realizing,optimization of stope structure parameters.Taking the example of a mine in Hunan Province,nine schemes,fitting an orthogonal model,were tested,five of the nine schemes were assessed by empowerment combination TOPSIS evaluation model.The synthetic superior degrees of schemes are 40.8%,70.2%,26.8%,52.9% and 4.7% for the second,third,fifth,sixth and eighth ones,respectively,and the third scheme becomes the best.

Cite this article

WAN Xiaoheng , WANG Xinmin , ZHU Yangya , JIANG Zhiliang , CHEN Qiusong . Optimization of the Stope Structural Parameters Based on Empowerment Combination TOPSIS[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2014 , 22(5) : 69 -73 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2014.05.069

References

[1] 董蕾.采动结构参数优化设计及可靠度分析[D].长沙:中南大学, 2010.
[2] 李启月,陈亮,潭勇,等.基于ANSYS的二步采场分段开挖过程模拟及稳定性分析[J].科技导报,2013,31 (22):44-49.
[3] ZHU Shuyun,JIAN Zhenquan,HOU Hongliang,et al.Analytical model and application of stress distribution on  mining coal floor[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2008,18 (1):13-17.
[4] Saaty T L,Rogers P C,Pell R.Portfolio selection through hierarchies[J].The Journal of Portfolio Management,1980,6(3):16-21.
[5] 李俊芳,吴小萍.基于AHP-FUZZY多层次评判的城市轨道交通线网规划方案综合评价[J].武汉理工大学报,2007,4(2):205-208.
[6] 刘星魁,朱红青,张圣柱,等.基于折衷权重的多层次安全性评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):92-96.
[7] Saaty T L.Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].Pittsburgh,PA:RWS,1994.
[8] 王新民,李洁慧,张钦礼,等.基于FAHP的采场结构参数优化研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2012,39 (2):163-168.
[9] 谢本贤,陈沅江,史秀志.深部岩体工程围岩质量评价的IRMR法研究[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2007,38(5):987-992.
[10] 周科平,翟建波,高峰,等.缓倾斜薄矿体采场伪倾斜布置及参数优化研究[J].广西大学学报:自然科学版,2012,2(37):376-381.

Outlines

/