img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索

黄金科学技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 862-870.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2019.06.862

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

滥泥坪铜矿三维地应力测量及巷道布置优化研究

谢也真(),曹平,陈昊然   

  1. 中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-17 修回日期:2019-07-28 出版日期:2019-12-31 发布日期:2019-12-24
  • 作者简介:谢也真(1994-),男,湖南娄底人,硕士研究生,从事岩石力学研究工作。839491639@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“开挖卸载诱导下的硬岩断裂破坏机理与尺寸效应研究”(11772358);中南大学自主探索创新项目“裂隙岩体卸荷、损伤、断裂机理及非线性特征研究”(2019zzts986)

Three-dimensional In-situ Stress Measurement and Optimization of Roadway Layout in Lanniping Copper Mine

Yezhen XIE(),Ping CAO,Haoran CHEN   

  1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China
  • Received:2019-04-17 Revised:2019-07-28 Online:2019-12-31 Published:2019-12-24

摘要:

随着矿山开采深度的持续增加,深部高地应力作用下矿区的地压灾害发生率逐渐增长。为使矿区能够安全合理地开展生产工作,准确测量区域内的地应力分布情况,并在此基础上进行巷道布置优化研究很有必要。采用套孔应力解除法对滥泥坪深部3个中段进行三维地应力测试,并对三维应力场分布特征进行分析。测量结果表明:滥泥坪矿区应力随深度基本呈线性增长,实测的各中段最大主应力值在28.62~43.10 MPa之间,原岩应力场以水平构造应力为主,总体表现为NNW-SSE向,根据测量结果调整巷道布置方向并建立三维地质模型对巷道稳定性进行分析,研究结果对巷道布置和矿山安全生产具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: 应力解除法, 三维地应力测量, 应力分布特征, 滥泥坪铜矿, 巷道稳定性, 数值模拟

Abstract:

The in-situ stress is the fundamental force causing damage and deformation of underground rock engineering.With the continuous increase of the mining depth,the ground pressure disaster of the mining area has gradually increased under the action of deep high ground stress.A large number of untreated goaf have been formed in the exploration and mining operations of the old and new areas of the Lanniping copper mine. Due to the influence of ground pressure,a number of collapse pits have been formed on the surface.In order to continue the safe and reasonable production work in the mining area,it is necessary to accurately measure the distribution of ground stress in the area and to optimize the layout of the roadway.The three-dimensional in-situ stress test was carried out on the three middle sections of the deep Lanniping copper mine by the stress relief method,9 sets of testing data in vertical direction are obtained.Meanwhile,the confining pressure rate test was carried out on the core sample,and the working state of 12 stress sheets was determined,and the distribution characteristics of the three-dimensional stress field were analyzed.The measurement results show that maximum principal stress,intermediate principal stress and minimum principal stress show an increasing trend with the increases of depth.The maximum principal stress values of the three measuring points in this test result are all high,the minimum value is 2 350 m,which is 28.62 MPa,and the maximum value is 1 900 m,about 43.1 MPa.According to domestic and international experience,the original rock stress field in the Lanniping belongs to the high geostress state.Combined with the layout of the stope and the specific mining method,the corresponding ground pressure testing measures and reasonable support methods should be adopted to ensure the safe mining of the mine.The original rock stress field is dominated by horizontal tectonic stress.The overall performance is NNW-SSW. According to the maximum shear stress theory,when the vertical stress at the top of the roadway and the vertical stress at the sidewall of the roadway are greatly different,the roadway layout should follow the formula of equal-stress axial ratio (i.e.,roadway gang width/roadway gang height = vertical stress at the sidewall of the roadway/vertical stress at the top of roadway),and then the roadway should be most stable.With the measurement results applied to maximum shear stress theory,the roadway layout is optimized,and a three-dimensional geological model is built within which the stability of the roadway is analyzed.Through analysis and comparison,it is found that the stress,displacement characteristics and plastic zone distribution of the surrounding rock in the rearranged roadway are superior to the original roadway.Therefore,the section size and stress distribution of the roadway should be considered to determine the optimal arrangement of the roadway in the actual engineering.The measurement results have important guiding significance for mine support design and safe production.

Key words: stress relief method, 3D ground stress measurement, stress distribution characteristics, Lanniping copper mine, drift stability, numerical calculation

中图分类号: 

  • TD263

图1

空心包体应力计结构示意图1-应变连接线;2-安装杆;3-连接销;4,11-封闭环;5-储胶腔,内装环氧树脂;6-应变花;7-环氧树脂筒;8-固定销;9-柱塞;10-出胶孔;12-导向头;A,B,C-应变片位置"

表1

滥泥坪铜矿地应力测点坐标及钻孔参数"

钻孔编号钻孔仰角/(°)钻孔方位角/(°)钻孔孔口中心点坐标
XYZ
LNP-2350m-1#322 895 684.27100 558.122 350.00
LNP-2138m-2#33502 895 766.38100 346.732 138.00
LNP-1900m-3#32802 896 018.94100 283.621 900.00

图2

空心包体应力测量步骤图(a)钻小孔;(b)钻大孔;(c)安装空心包体;(d)应力解除"

图3

2 350 m中段应力解除曲线"

图4

围压加载试验曲线"

表2

滥泥坪矿区测点弹性参数计算结果"

测点编号内外径比μE
μ1μ2μ3E1E2E3
LNP-2350m-137.65/130.340.230.260.3154 06755 73459 431

LNP-2350m-2

LNP-2350m-3

37.62/130.370.180.240.2057 69853 42356 430
37.69/130.320.210.250.3359 58157 64560 136
参数均值37.65/130.340.2557 127
LNP-2138m-137.56/130.130.210.160.1416 85218 74120 067
LNP-2138m-237.52/130.150.240.210.1961 23769 56564 893
LNP-2138m-337.59/130.170.410.450.4160 30859 86765 217
参数均值37.56/130.150.2648 535
LNP-1900m-137.23/130.310.250.190.2858 33560 14359 078
LNP-1900m-237.25/130.320.240.250.3157 02359 87360 342
LNP-1900m-337.20/130.350.370.250.2758 37760 45561 978
参数均值37.23/130.330.2759 511

表3

各测点原岩应力测量结果"

测点编号埋深/m最大主应力中间主应力最小主应力
大小/MPa方位/(°)倾角/(°)大小/MPa方位/(°)倾角/(°)大小/MPa方位/(°)倾角/(°)
LNP-2350-1#80028.62124.38-3.5821.4328.16-59.9717.73216.43-29.77
LNP-2138-2#1 01236.6165.9910.5828.4324.7076.5323.13257.548.23
LNP-1900-3#1 25043.1161.56-18.9933.62-77.83-55.9427.21241.4127.12

图5

巷道开挖水平断面应力分布图注:σn为巷道水平方向的帮部应力;σH、σh分别为最大和最小主应力"

图6

三维巷道地质模型"

表4

滥泥坪矿区各岩层岩石力学参数"

参数名称陡山沱(白云岩)落雪一段(白云岩)落雪二段(白云岩)因民三段(白云岩)辉长岩(白云岩)矿体断层
天然重度γ/(kN·m-328.127.928.027.929.128.623.0
岩体抗剪强度c/kPa8751 7121 93617 941 7941 336120
内摩擦角φ/(°)31.9833.1235.1933.2232.927.120.3
泊松比0.210.230.210.220.190.250.39
弹性模量/GPa3.24.75.44.73.83.40.07
抗压强度/MPa13.918.420.316.415.914.73.0
抗拉强度/MPa1.51.61.91.81.71.10.1

图7

不同走向巷道围岩的特征对比"

1 蔡美峰,乔兰,李华斌.地应力测量原理和技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1995:1-27.
Cai Meifeng,Qiao Lan,Li Huabin. Rock Stress Measurement Principles and Techniques[M].Beijing:Science Press,1995:1-27.
2 Hayashi K,Sato A,Ito T. In-situ stress measurements by hydraulic fracturing for a rock mass with many planes of weakness[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,1997,34(1):45-48.
3 何满潮,谢和平,彭苏萍,等. 深部开采岩体力学研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(16):2803-2813.
He Manchao,Xie Heping,Peng Suping,et al. Study on rock mechanics in deep mining engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2005,24(16):2803-2813.
4 谢和平,高峰,鞠杨.深部岩体力学研究与探索[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(11):2161-2178.
Xie Heping,Gao Feng,Ju Yang.Research and development of rock mechanics in deep ground engineering[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015,34(11):2161-2178.
5 蔡美峰,薛鼎龙,任奋华. 金属矿深部开采现状与发展战略[J]. 工程科学学报,2019,41(4):417-426.
Cai Meifeng,Xue Dinglong,Ren Fenhua.Current status and development strategy of metal mines[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering,2019,41(4):417-426.
6 严健,何川,汪波,等,雅鲁藏布江缝合带深埋长大隧道群岩爆孕育及特征[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(4): 769-781.
Yan Jian,He Chuan,Wang Bo,et al. Inoculation and characters of rockbursts in extra-long and deep-lying tunnels located on Yarlung Zangbo suture[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(4): 769-781.
7 张百红,韩立军,韩贵雷,等,深部三维地应力实测与巷道稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学,2008,29(9): 2547-2550,2555.
Zhang Baihong,Han Lijun,Han Guilei,et al.Study of 3D in-situ stress measurement and stability of roadways in depth[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2008,29(9): 2547-2550,2555.
8 江权,冯夏庭,李邵军,等. 高应力下大型硬岩地下洞室群稳定性设计优化的裂化—抑制法及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(6):1081-1101.
Jiang Quan,Feng Xiating,Li Shaojun,et al.Cracking-restraint design method for large underground caverns with hard rock under high geostress condition and its practical application[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(6):1081-1101.
9 崔光耀,王雪来,王明胜. 高地应力深埋隧道断裂破碎带段大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2019,41(7):1354-1360.
Cui Guangyao,Wang Xuelai,Wang Mingsheng.Field test study on large deformation control measures of surrounding rock of deep tunnel in fault zone with high geostress[J].Chinese Jounal of Geotechnical Engineering,2019,41(7):1354-1360.
10 马召林,焦雷,赵爽,等. 高地应力软岩隧道衬砌裂损重新施作段结构安全性分析[J]. 隧道建设,2018,38(9):1489-1496.
Ma Zhaolin,Jiao Lei,Zhao Shuang,et al.Structural safety analysis of reconstruction section of Lining cracking in high geo-stress soft rock tunnel[J].Tunnel Construction,2018,38(9):1489-1496.
11 谢和平.“深部岩体力学与开采理论”研究构想与预期成果展望[J]. 工程科学与技术,2017,49(2):1-16.
Xie Heping.Research framework and anticipated results of deep rock mechanics and mining theory[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences,2017,49(2):1-16.
12 彭华,马秀敏,姜景捷. 山丹地应力监测站体应变仪的地震效应[J]. 地质力学学报,2008,14(2):97-108.
Peng Hua,Ma Xiumin,Jiang Jingjie. Analysis of the volume strain data from the Shandan in-situ stress monitoring station[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2008,14(2):97-108.
13 乔兰,欧阳振华,来兴平,等. 三山岛金矿采空区地应力测量及其结果分析[J]. 工程科学学报,2004,26(6):569-571.
Qiao Lan,Ouyang Zhenhua,Lai Xingping,et al.In-situ stress measuring and its result analysis in Sanshandao gold mine of China[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering,2004,26(6):569-571.
14 Worotnicki G,Walton R.Triaxial “Hollow Inclusion” Gauges for Determination of Rock Stresses in Situ[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstracts,1976,13(10):124-125.
15 蔡美峰,刘卫东,李远. 玲珑金矿深部地应力测量及矿区地应力场分布规律[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(2):227-233.
Cai Meifeng,Liu Weidong,Li Yuan.In-situ stress measurement at deep position of Linglong gold mine and distribution law of in-situ stress field in mine area[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(2):227-233.
16 李远,王卓,乔兰,等. 基于双温度补偿的瞬接续采型空心包体地应力测试技术研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(6):1479-1487.
Li Yuan,Wang Zhuo,Qiao Lan,et al.Development of CSIRO cell with the compromised application of instantaneous data-logging,no-power data-connection and twin temperature compensation techniques[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2017,36(6):1479-1487.
17 戚玉亮,王同旭,赵斌.车集矿深部三维初始地应力测量研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2010,32(7):1005-1010.
Qi Yuliang,Wang Tongxu,Zhao Bin. 3D initial ground stress measurement at deep position of Juji Mine[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2010,32(7):1005-1010.
18 刘允芳,朱杰兵,刘元坤. 空心包体式钻孔三向应变计地应力测量的研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(4):448-453.
Liu Yunfang,Zhu Jiebing,Liu Yuankun. Research on hollow inclusion strain gauge for geostress measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2001,20(4):448-453.
19 刘允芳,刘元坤. 围压试验在空心包体式应变计地应力测量中的作用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(23):3932-3937.
LiuYunfang,LiuYuankun.Function of confining pressure test on Hollow inclusion Triaxial strain gauge for geostress measurement[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2004,23(23):3932-3937.
20 Zhou A T,Wang K,Fan L P,et al. Gas-solid coupling laws for deep high-gas coal seams[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2017,27(4):675-679.
21 孟庆彬,韩立军,乔卫国. 基于地应力实测的深部软岩巷道稳定性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2012,8(5):922-927.
Meng Qingbin,Han Lijun,Qiao Weiguo,et al.Research on deep soft roadway stability based on in-site geo-stress measurement[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2012,8(5):922-927.
22 陈登红. 深部典型回采巷道围岩变形破坏特征及控制机理研究[D].淮南:安徽理工大学,2014.
Chen Denghong.Research on Fractured Deformation Characteristics and Control Mechanism of Surrounding Rock on Deep Typical Gateways[D].Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology,2014.
[1] 高远,陈庆发,蒋腾龙. 大新锰矿复杂空区群三维数值模型构建方法及胶结充填治理研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(6): 851-861.
[2] 田军, 刘建坡, 杨勇, 张长银. 进路充填法爆破扰动诱发充填体破坏规律研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(5): 687-695.
[3] 宋恩祥, 李强, 张静, 彭康. 蚀变带内矿体开采中人工假底的应用研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(5): 722-730.
[4] 杨仕教,王志会. 上覆公路浅埋采空区群稳定性数值模拟[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(4): 505-512.
[5] 梁瑞,俞瑞利,周文海,黄小彬,王建勇,熊征宇. 空气间隔装药爆破模型在矿房回采中的应用[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(3): 358-367.
[6] 秦世康,陈庆发,尹庭昌. 岩石与岩体冻融损伤内涵区别及研究进展[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(3): 385-397.
[7] 刘锋,王昭坤,马凤山,王波,王剑波,董春蕾. 矿山深部卸压技术研究现状及展望[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(3): 425-432.
[8] 王春,王成,熊祖强,程露萍,王怀彬. 动力扰动下深部出矿巷道围岩的变形特征[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(2): 232-240.
[9] 方传峰,王晋淼,李剡兵,贾明涛. 基于PFC2D-DFN的自然崩落法数值模拟研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(2): 189-198.
[10] 吕闹,汪海波. 厚硬顶板弱化前后垮落致灾数值模拟研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(2): 257-264.
[11] 王从陆,李童. 基于Ventsim的深井线性热源对有效通风量的影响分析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(2): 271-277.
[12] 李响,怀震,李夕兵,张倬瑶. 基于裂纹扩展模型的脆性岩石破裂特征及力学性能研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(1): 41-51.
[13] 陈冲,李夕兵,冯帆. 诱导巷道的围岩松动破坏区数值研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2018, 26(6): 771-779.
[14] 刘连生,钟清亮,闫雷,钟文,梁龙华. 频繁生产爆破加载下饱水岩体累积损伤效应声波测试研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2018, 26(6): 750-760.
[15] 彭博. 库水位骤降耦合不同类型降雨泥岩边坡渗透稳定性数值模拟研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2018, 26(5): 647-655.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!