img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索

黄金科学技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 31-39.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2018.01.031

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于熵权和物元分析的矿山安全避险“六大系统”可靠性评价

柯愈贤1,2,王新民2*,刘奇2,刘恩彦2   

  1. 1.江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院,江西 赣州 341000;
    2.中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-03 修回日期:2016-10-08 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2018-05-19
  • 通讯作者: 王新民(1957-),男,安徽安庆人,教授,从事采矿与充填技术研究工作。wxm1958@126.com
  • 作者简介:柯愈贤(1987-),男,重庆垫江人,讲师,从事采矿与充填技术研究工作。djxkyx@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题“多空区厚大矿体安全高效开采及工程化技术研究”(编号:2015BAB14B01)和江西理工大学博士启动基金“全尾砂似膏体流变特性与管道输送阻力研究”(编号:3401223331)联合资助
     

Reliability Evaluation of Mine’s Six-System Based on Entropy Weight and Matter Element Analysis

KE Yuxian 1,2,WANG Xinmin 2,LIU Qi 2,LIU Enyan 2   

  1. 1.School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China;2.School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China
  • Received:2016-08-03 Revised:2016-10-08 Online:2018-02-28 Published:2018-05-19

摘要:

为了更加准确合理地评价“六大系统”的可靠性等级,运用熵权法与物元分析理论建立了“六大系统”可靠性评价模型。基于“六大系统”的组成成分,提出了影响“六大系统”可靠性的32项指标,采用物元变换理论构建“六大系统”可靠性评价的物元体系,计算单个待评估指标与设定评价等级的相关度,然后利用熵权法确定待评估指标的权重,最后根据待评估指标与设定等级的综合相关度确定“六大系统”的可靠性级别。研究结果表明:该方法综合考虑了各项评估指标对评价体系的影响,评价结果与实际情况相符,能够准确、客观地反映“六大系统”的建设情况。

关键词: 六大系统, 可靠性评价, 熵权, 物元分析法, 相关度, 安全性分析, 评价体系, 采矿工程

Abstract:

To evaluate the reliability level of mine’s six-system more accurately and reasonably,an evaluation model of six-system was constructed based on entropy weight method and matter element analysis theory. Based on the composition of six systems,32 indexes that affect the reliability of six systems were proposed,the matter element system of six-system reliability evaluation was built through matter element transformation theory,and association degree of individual index to setting assessment level was calculated.Then the weight of indexes to be evaluated were determined by entropy weight method,and the reliability level of mine’s six-system was determined according to comprehensive association degree of evaluation and setting level.The study results show that the evaluation result is identical to actual situation owing to the constructed model comprehensively considered all the reliability affecting factors to the assessment system,which can reflect the reliability situation of mine’s six-system accurately and objectively.

Key words: six-system, reliability evaluation, entropy weight, matter element analysis method, relevancy degree, security analysis, evaluation system, mining engineering

中图分类号: 

  • TD79

[ 1 ] 丰建荣,史鹏飞,代贵生. 煤矿井下安全避险“六大系统”的可靠性分析[J].太原理工大学学报,2011,42(6):625-627.Feng Jianrong,Shi Pengfei,Dai Guisheng. Analysis on the reliability of the “six systems” for coal mine underground danger prevention[J].Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology,2011,42(6):625-627.
[ 2 ] Wang Y Q,Chen X J,Li Z G,et al. Design and analysis of the six systems of refuge chamber in coal mine[J].Advanced Materials Research,2013,619:315-320.
[ 3 ] 李宁,王李管,贾明涛. 基于层次分析法的矿井六大系统模糊综合评价[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(2):631-637.Li Ning,Wang Liguan,Jia Mingtao. An analytic hierarchy process based fuzzy evaluation of underground mine six-system[J].Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2015,46(2):631-637.
[ 4 ] 杜达文,王保民,张瑾. 模糊综合评价法在煤矿“六大系统”中的应用[[J].工矿自动化,2014,40(4):42-45.Du Dawen,Wang Baomin,Zhang Jin. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in coal mine “six systems”[J].Industry and Automation,2014,40(4):42-45.
[ 5 ] 李宁,王李管,贾明涛,等. 基于层次分析法和证据理论的矿山井下六大系统安全评价[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(1):287-292.Li Ning,Wang Liguan,Jia Mingtao,et al. Safety evaluation of underground mine six systems based on analytical hierarchy process and evidence theory[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2014,45(1):287-292.
[ 6 ] 吴凤东,胡乃联,王长龙. 基于未确知测度理论的煤矿井下“六大系统”安全评价模型[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(10):1731-1735.Wu Fengdong,Hu Nailian,Wang Changlong. Safety evaluation model of “six systems” in coal mine underground based on the unascertained measure theory[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2011,36(10):1731-1735.
[ 7 ] 李兵,李新举,李海龙,等. 物元分析法在矿区生态健康评价中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2011,11(5):119-122.Li Bing,Li Xinju,Li Hailong,et al. Innovated matter-element method for the ecosystem health evaluation in mining areas[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2011,11(5):119-122.
[ 8 ] 王新民,柯愈贤,鄢德波,等. 基于熵权法和物元分析的采空区危险性评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2012,22(6):71-78.Wang Xinmin,Ke Yuxian,Yan Debo,et al. Underground goaf risk evaluation based on entropy weight and matter element analysis[J].China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(6):71-78.
[ 9 ] 王洪德,曹英浩. 基于改进变权物元可拓模型的围岩稳定性评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2013,23(8):23-29.Wang Hongde,Cao Yinghao. Evaluation of surrounding rock stability based on improved matter-element extension model with variable weight[J].China Safety Science Journal,2013,23(8):23-29.
[ 10 ] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(2):535-540.Liang Guilan,Xu Weiya,Tan Xiaolong. Application of extension theory based on entropy weight to rock quality evaluation[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2010,31(2):535-540.
[ 11 ] Li X X,Wang K S,Liu L W,et al. Application of the entropy weight and TOPSIS method in safety evaluation of coal mines [J].Procedia Engineering,2011,26(4):2085-2091.
[ 12 ] 文唯,郑明贵. 海外矿山项目并购宏观经济风险评价[J].有色金属科学与工程,2016,7(2):110-116.Wen Wei,Zheng Minggui. Macroeconomic risk evaluation of oversea mine projects M&A[J].Nonferrous M etal s Science and Engineering,2016,7(2):110-116.
[ 13 ] Zhu H N,Yuan X Z,Liang J. Integrated evaluation system under randomness and fuzziness for groundwater contamination risk assessment in a little town[J].Journal of Central South University 2014,21(3):1044-1050.
[ 14 ] 彭频,李静. 基于熵权TOPSIS的建筑供应商选择问题研究[J].江西理工大学学报,2010,31(2):67-69.Peng Pin,Li Jing. Selection of construction suppliers based on entropy weight and TOPSIS [J].Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,2010,31(2):67-69.
[ 15 ] 王玉剑. 基于模糊综合评价法的煤矿安全避险“六大系统”可靠性评价研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2015.Wang Yujian. The Reliability Evaluation Research on Six Systems of Coal Mine Safety Based on the Fuzzy Comperehensive Evaluation Method[D].Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology,2015.
[ 16 ] 陈建宏,曾闵,李涛,等. 基于物元分析—未确知测度理论的地下矿山安全避险“六大系统”可靠性评估方法[J].黄金科学技术,2015,23(1):80-84.Chen Jianhong,Zeng Min,Li Tao,et al. Reliability evaluation model of “six systems” in underground mine based on the matter-element analysis and unascertained measure[J].Gold Science and Technology,2015,23(1):80-84.

[1] 李筱, 许钧, 张成旭, 隋来伦, 王在勇. 基于CWM-TOPSIS模型的金属矿山企业安全管控能力评价[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2024, 32(1): 100-108.
[2] 刘贻玲, 钟一霞. 物质流视角下稀土企业全产业链发展仿真研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023, 31(5): 835-844.
[3] 徐先锋,邢鹏飞,王岁红,汪泳. 基于博弈论G1-EW-TOPSIS法的岩体质量评价和应用[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022, 30(5): 704-712.
[4] 唐宇,王少锋. 单向受限应力下镐型截齿破岩特性及其影响因素分析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2021, 29(5): 669-679.
[5] 景岳,王少锋,鲁金涛. 矿岩开挖松动区厚度预测及非爆机械化开采判据[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2021, 29(4): 525-534.
[6] 叶光祥,黄智群,王晓军,张树标,苑栋. 基于未确知测度理论的石英脉型钨矿山采空区稳定性评价[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2021, 29(3): 433-439.
[7] 廖宝泉,柯愈贤,卿琛,张华熙,黄豪琪,方立发,王成,陶铁军. 基于相对差异函数的金属矿采空区危险性识别[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2021, 29(3): 440-448.
[8] 石勇,史秀志,丁文智. 基于改进熵权法—未确知测度模型的黄金洞尾矿库综合安全评价[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2021, 29(1): 155-163.
[9] 柯愈贤,王成,方立发,廖宝泉. 基于组合权重和物元分析的矿山安全生产状况研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020, 28(6): 910-919.
[10] 王猛, 史秀志, 张舒. 面向产能优化的地下金属矿山安全保障条件评价研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020, 28(5): 753-760.
[11] 周科平, 侯霄峰, 林允. 基于综合决策云模型的围岩稳定性分级方法研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020, 28(3): 372-379.
[12] 宋品芳, 李孜军, 李蓉蓉, 赵淑琪, 徐宇. 基于熵权模糊法的高海拔矿井风机性能影响因素分析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020, 28(3): 457-464.
[13] 胡建华,徐朔寒,徐泽林,韩磊. 城市地下矿山采矿方法的数值与熵权耦合优选[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019, 27(4): 513-521.
[14] 吴德明,杨珊,王喜梅. 一种改进的尾矿库安全和谐度方程评价方法[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2018, 26(5): 662-668.
[15] 卢富然, 陈建宏. 基于AHP和熵权TOPSIS模型的岩爆预测方法[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2018, 26(3): 365-371.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!