img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索

黄金科学技术 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 39-45.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2017.04.039

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于最优组合赋权的地下矿山岩体质量可拓评价模型

胡建华,艾自华   

  1. 中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南  长沙  410083
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-29 修回日期:2017-03-20 出版日期:2017-08-30 发布日期:2017-10-30
  • 作者简介:胡建华(1975-),男,湖南衡南人,博士,教授,从事高效安全采矿技术与岩土工程的稳定性分析研究工作。hujh21@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    “十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目“深部多层重叠矿体高效开采与灾害控制关键技术研究”(编号:2015BAB12B01)和国家自然科学基金项目“深部采动下地质结构体跨尺度时变力学行为试验及机理”(编号:41672298)联合资助。
     

Extension Evaluation Model of Rock Mass Quality for Underground Mine Based on Optimal Combination Weighting

HU Jianhua,AI Zihua   

  1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha    410083,Hunan,China
  • Received:2015-12-29 Revised:2017-03-20 Online:2017-08-30 Published:2017-10-30

摘要:

岩体质量分级辩识是矿山工程设计、施工与支护的基础,在岩体工程应用中具有重要的意义。应用可拓学理论,以司家营铁矿超大规模地下采场的岩体工程为例,选取岩石单轴抗压强度、围岩质量指标、结构面摩擦系数、节理间距、地下水状态和完整性系数等评价指标,建立矿山岩体质量评价物元模型。基于最优组合赋权理论,提出了将层次分析法和熵值法获得的权值进行最优组合的指标权重系数的确定方法。研究结果表明:(1)计算获得了待评价岩体的工程质量特征值,实现了岩体工程分类,客观反映岩体与相邻岩体等级间的差值,为矿山岩体工程提供基础的设计参数;(2)基于最优组合赋权的权重系数,可以实现多种权重值的组合赋权,降低不同赋权间的误差,提高了质量评价的准确性;(3)评价结果与工程地质RMR法、层次分析法和熵权法评价结果一致性高,说明评价结果可靠;(4)基于离差平方和最大,使得评价结果之间的离散性高,更有利于决策。 

关键词: 岩体质量评价, 最优组合, 权系数, 物元模型, 可拓学

Abstract:

The classification identification of rock mass quality is the basis of mine engineering design,construction and support,and has vital significance in rock mass engineering application.Based on extensional theory,taking rock engineering of super-large scale underground stope in Sijiaying iron mine as an example,the evaluation matter element model of rock mass quality was established according on factors,i.e. rock uniaxial compressive strengthen (RC),rock quality designation(RQD),strengthen coefficient of structural plane(Jf),joints distance(Jd), groundwater condition (W),integrity coefficient(Kv).The optimal combination of AHP and entropy method based on optimal combination weighting law used to calculate weight aggregation of evaluating factors is proposed.The study shows that:(1)The engineering quality characteristic value of rock mass to be evaluated are obtained,realizes the engineering rock mass category and objectively reflect the difference between rock mass and  adjacent rock mass level,provides the basis design parameters for mine rock project;(2)Based on the optimal combination weight coefficient,achieve combination of multiple weight values,reduce the error between different weights,improve the accuracy of rock quality evaluation;(3)The evaluation result is consistent with the results by engineering geological RMR method,analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method,so evaluation result is reliable;(4)Based on the maximum square sum of deviations,the dispersion between evaluation results is high,so it is more conductive to decision-making.

Key words:  rock quality evaluation, optimal combination, weighting coefficients, matter element model, extension theory

中图分类号: 

  • TD313

[1] Bieniawski Z T.Engineering Rock Mass Classification[M].New York:Wiley Inster Science,1989:1-15.
[2] Bieniawski Z T.Classification of rock masses for engineering:The RMR system and future trends[J].Comprehensive Rock Engineering,1993(3):553-573.
[3] Li Qiang.Study on the application of BP nervous network in classification of rockmass quality[J].Northwestern Seismo- logical Journal,2002,24(3):220-225.[李强.BP神经网络在工程岩体质量分级中的应用研究[J].西北地震学报,2002,24(3):220-225.]
[4] Gong Fengqiang,Li Xibing.Application of distance discri- minant analysis method to classification of engineering quality of rock masses[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(1):190-194.[宫凤强,李夕兵.距离判别分析法在岩体质量等级分类中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(1):190-194.]
[5] Cao Wengui,Zhang Yongjie.Study on two-stage fuzzy synthetic judgment method with changing weight value for rock quality classification in underground structures[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2006,25(8): 1612-1618.[曹文贵,张永杰.地下结构岩体质量分类的变权重二级模糊综合评判方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006, 25(8):1612-1618.]
[6] Hu Jianhua,Shang Junlong,Lei Tao.Rock mass quality evaluation of underground engineering based on RS-TOPSIS method[J].Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2012,43(11):4412-4419.[胡建华,尚俊龙,雷涛.基于RS-TOPSIS法的地下工程岩体质量评价[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(11):4412-4419.]
[7] Tang Hai,Wan Wen,Liu Jinhai.Evaluation of underground cavern rock quality based on uncertainty measure theory[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2011,32(4):1181-1185.[唐海,万文,刘金海.基于未确知测度理论的地下洞室岩体质量评价[J].岩土力学,2011,32(4):1181-1185.]
[8] Kang Zhiqiang,Feng Xiating,Zhou Hui.Application of extenics theory to evaluation of underground cavern rock quality based on stratification analysis method[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2006,25(S): 3687-3693.[康志强,冯夏庭,周辉.基于层次分析法的可拓学理论在地下洞室岩体质量评价中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(增):3687-3693.]
[9] Liang Guilan,Xu Weiya,Tan Xiaolong. Application of ex- tension theory based on entropy weight to rock quality evaluation[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2010,31(2):535-540.  [梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙.基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J].岩土力学,2010,31(2):535-540.]
[10] Yang Chunyan,Cai Wen.Study on extension engineering[J].Engineering Science,2000,2(2):90-96.[杨春燕,蔡文.可拓工程研究[J].中国工程科学,2000,2(2):90-96.]
[11] Cai Wen,Yang Chunyan,Lin Weichu.Extension Engineering Method[M].Beijing:Science Press,1997:87-89.[ 蔡文,杨春燕,林伟初.可拓工程方法[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1997:87-89.]
[12] Shang Junlong,Hu Jianhua,Mo Rongshi,et al.Predication model of game theory-matter-element extension for   blas- tability classification and its application[J].Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2013,30(1):86-92.[尚俊龙,胡建华,莫荣世,等.可爆性分级的博弈论物元可拓预测模型及其应用[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2013,30(1):86-92.]
[13] Huang Rendong,Zhao Zhifei,Li Pan,et al.Based on entropy weight method and extenics tunnel’s quality evaluation of surrounding rock[J].Highway Engineering,2012,1(2): 139-143.[黄仁东,赵志飞,李盼,等.基于熵权法和可拓学理论的隧道围岩质量评价[J].公路工程,2012,1(2):139-143.]
[14]  Chen Huayou.Research on optimal combination determi- ning weights method for multiple attribute decision making[J].Operations Research and Management Science,2003,12(2):6-10. [陈华友.多属性决策中的一种最优组合赋权方法研究[J].运筹与管理,2003,12(2): 6-10.]
[15] Chen Wei,Xia Jianhua.An optimal weights combination method considering both subjective and objective weight information [J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2007,37(1):17-22.[陈伟,夏建华.综合主、客观权重信息的最优组合赋权方法[J].数学的实践与认识,2007,37(1):17-22.]
[16] The National Standards Compilation Group of People’s Republic of China.Standard for engineering classification of rock masses:GB50218-94[S].Beijing:China Planning Press,1995.[中华人民共和国国家标准编写组.工程岩体分级标准:GB50218-94 [S].北京:中国计划出版社,1995.]
[17] Bieniaski Z T.Engineering classification of jointed rock masses[J].Transaction of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering,1973,15(12):335-344.]

[1] 任琪,张国存,王广伟. 青海某金矿浮选药剂加药点及用量优化实践[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2017, 25(6): 68-74.
[2] 赵彬,李小贝,戴兴国,王新民,张德明. 基于变权重理论的边坡稳定性未确知分析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2016, 24(6): 90-95.
[3] 吴肖坤,刘敦文,江帆,唐洋,杨光,杨晨. 基于特征值域的可拓学理论的工程岩体质量评价[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2015, 23(2): 68-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!