img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索

黄金科学技术

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

软弱破碎岩体工程地质调查与质量评价

江飞飞1,2,李向东1,2,盛佳1,2,张彩青3   

  1. 1.长沙矿山研究院有限责任公司,湖南  长沙   410012;
    2.国家金属采矿工程技术研究中心,湖南  长沙   410012;
    3.嵩县前河矿业有限责任公司,河南  嵩县  471433
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-12 修回日期:2015-09-06 出版日期:2016-06-28 发布日期:2016-10-08
  • 作者简介:江飞飞(1990-),男,湖北广水人,助理工程师,从事高效采矿工艺技术及支护技术等方面研究工作。jfei90@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技部转制科研院所创新能力专项资金项目“叠层空区环境下矿体集中强化开采技术”(编号:2014EG215027)资助

Engineering Geological Investigation and Quality Evaluation of Soft Fractured Rock

JIANG Feifei1,2,LI Xiangdong1,2,SHENG Jia1,2,ZHANG Caiqing3#br#   

  1. 1.Changsha Institute of Mining Research Co.,Ltd.,Changsha   410012,Hunan,China;
    2.National Engineering Research Center for Metal  Mining,Changsha   410012,Hunan,China;
    3.Songxian Qianhe Mining Industry Co.,Ltd.,Songxian   471433,Henan,China
  • Received:2015-07-12 Revised:2015-09-06 Online:2016-06-28 Published:2016-10-08

摘要:

合理的工程地质调查与岩体质量评价是地下工程设计、施工和采矿活动的基础,针对前河金矿软弱破碎类型岩体,在充分了解矿山地质、开采现状及软岩特点的基础上,采用适合软岩特点和符合矿山实际情况的测线法对其软弱破碎岩体进行详细的工程地质调查与分析,并采用MRMR-2000系统法和Q系统法分别对矿体和上下盘岩体质量进行了评价。结果表明:矿岩体中的结构面非常发育,均发育有3组以上的优势结构面,结构面平均线密度均超过25 条/m;矿体及上下盘岩体均属Ⅴ级,矿岩体质量总体评价均为差,其中,下盘岩体相对稍好,上盘岩体次之,矿体最差。

关键词: 软弱破碎岩体, 工程地质调查, MRMR-2000分级系统, 岩体质量评价

Abstract:

Reasonable engineering geological investigation and rock quality evaluation is the basis of design,construction and mining activities in underground engineering,aiming at the type of soft fractured rock in Qianhe gold mine,based on the fully understanding of the mine geology,current mining situation and characteristics of soft rock,investigated and analysed the engineering geological of soft fractured rock in detail with scan line method,which is suitable for the characteristics of soft rock and the mine’s actual situation,and used the MRMR-2000 system and Q system to evaluate the rock mass quality of orebody,hanging wall and footwall rock mass separately.The result shows that the structural plane in orebody and its surrounding rock are extraordinarily growing,they are contain more than 3 groups of preferred structure plane,and the average line density of them are more than 25 lines per meter;orebody and its surrounding rock are classified asⅤ,and the overall evaluation of rock quality are bad,of which the footwall rock mass is relatively and slightly better,the hanging wall rock mass takes the second place,and the orebody is the worst.

Key words: soft fractured rock, engineering geological investigation, MRMR-2000 rating system, rock quality evaluation

中图分类号: 

  • TU452 

[1] 姚松明,王建海,王小春,等.河南前河金矿破碎矿体探、采工程布置合理性探讨[J].黄金科学技术,2013,21(3):73-76.
[2] 毛付龙.河南前河金矿构造控矿规律分析及成矿预测[D].北京:中国地质大学,2008.
[3] 杨志芳,王小春,付文姜.下向分层胶结充填采矿法在前河公司的应用[J].黄金,2011,32(3):33-37.
[4] 蔡美峰.岩石力学与工程[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:359-366.
[5] 董金奎,申延,邱俊刚.焦家金矿寺庄矿区岩体节理裂隙调查与矿岩稳定性分析[J].黄金科学技术,2012,20(2):58-61.
[6] 李向东,周益龙.岩体结构面调查技术规范[S].长沙:长沙矿山研究院,2006.
[7] 徐光黎.岩石质量指标RQD的估算方法[J].水文地质工程地质,1991,18(6):43-45.
[8] 江飞飞.自然崩落法矿岩可崩性系统化评价及崩落规律研究[D].长沙:长沙矿山研究院,2014.
[9] Jalalifar H,Mojedifar S,Sahebi A A.Prediction of rock mass rating using fuzzy logic and multi-variable RMR regression model[J].International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2014,24(2):237-244.
[10] Singh B,Goel R K. Chapter 6-Rock mass rating[M]//Engineering Rock Mass Classification.Amstel dam:Elsevier B V,2011:45-62.
[11] 陈赞成,余斌,解联库,等.大型地下铁矿工程地质调查与岩体质量评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):63-68.
[12] Jakubec J,Esterhuizen G S.Use of the mining rock mass rating(MRMR)classification:industry experience[C]// International Workshop on Rock Mass Classification in Underground Mining,Pennsylvania:2007.
[13] Jakubec J,Laubscher D H.The MRMR rock mass rating classification system in mining practice[C]// MassMin 2000,Queensland:2000.
[14] Barton N.Rock mass classification and tunnel reinforcement selection using the q-system[C]//Proctor of Symposiaon Rock Classification Systems for Engineering Purposes,ASTM Special Technical Publication.Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials,1988:59-88.
[15] 康小兵,许模,陈旭.岩体质量Q系统分类法及其应用[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(4):91-95.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!