img

Wechat

Adv. Search

Gold Science and Technology ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 593-601.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2021.04.202

• Mining Technology and Mine Management • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Effect Mechanism of Safety Culture on Employee Safety Behavior in Metal Mines

Xiuzhi SHI(),Chunsheng DING(),Yaguang QIN   

  1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China
  • Received:2020-11-25 Revised:2021-02-05 Online:2021-08-31 Published:2021-10-08
  • Contact: Chunsheng DING E-mail:baopo@csu.edu.cn;837157817@qq.com

Abstract:

The development of any enterprise must take safety as the fundamental premise,and safety is the first priority of mining enterprises.Mining-related occupations have significant hazards that are difficult to eliminate and characterized by a lower occupational safety culture and a higher accident rate than occupations with lower or easily eliminated hazards.The safety production situation in metal mining enterprises is still very serious,and human-induced accidents account for most of them.Therefore,it is very important for enterprises to strengthen the construction of their own safety culture and let employees develop good safety behavior habits.The current literatures mainly focus on the relationship between safety culture and safety behavior,but few studies focus on the mediating variables between them.In order to further explore the mechanism of the effect of safety culture on employees’ safety behavior in metal mining enterprises,psychological authorization was introduced as a mediating variable.Questionnaire and empirical analysis were used in this study.A questionnaire survey was conducted among the workers in a metal mining enterprise in Guangdong,and the data were analyzed by using the structural equation modeling software SmartPLS in empirical analysis.The data collected by the questionnaire survey have good reliability and validity and can be used for further analysis.The results show that safety culture has a positive and significant effect on employees’ safety behavior,and psychological empowerment plays a complete mediating role between safety culture and safety behavior.The influence of each dimension of safety culture on safety behavior is different.The direct influence coefficients of safety communication,safety management commitment,safety training and safety incentive are 0.495,0.481,0.276 and 0.155,respectively.In the dimension of psychological empowerment,the influence path coefficients of job meaning,self-efficacy and autonomy on safe behavior are 0.200,0.180 and 0.696,respectively.The study further defined that the psychological authorization between safety culture and safety behavior plays a specific role.Therefore,the leaders of metal mining enterprises should not only strengthen the construction of safety culture to improve the safety behavior of employees,but also be good at creating a sense of psychological authorization for employees to improve their work autonomy and self-efficacy,so as to enable employees to develop good habits of safety behavior,in turn,improve employee safety behavior,to achieve the purpose of reduce and prevent accidents,truly realizing the metal mine enterprise intrinsically safe.

Key words: safety culture, safety behavior, psychological authorization, mediation effect, reliability, validity, metal mine

CLC Number: 

  • TD79

Fig.1

Reciprocal safety culture model(Cooper,2000)"

Fig.2

Schematic diagram of research hypothesis frame"

Table 1

Reliability analysis of measurement model"

维度测量题项外部模型载荷Cronbach’s alphaCRAVE

安全管理

承诺

公司领导高度重视安全问题0.7630.8380.8910.673
公司为员工提供了充分的个人安全防护装备0.840
公司领导看到员工不安全作业时会及时采取纠正措施0.851
公司领导定期参加安全会议0.824
安全培训公司为员工开展定期的工作技能和安全培训0.7590.8630.9020.649
公司为员工提供充分的培训,以确保员工学会各种安全制度和操作规程0.832
在企业培训项目中,管理者高度重视安全培训0.919
公司鼓励员工参与安全培训0.758
经过安全培训,员工可以发现工作现场存在的危险源0.748
安全交流如果我向领导反映安全问题,领导会听取我的意见0.7040.8660.9030.653
如果同事违规操作,我会给予提醒0.760
我会经常和同事交流安全操作的心得0.850
公司领导经常提供安全反馈和建议0.856
公司有关的安全信息会及时公布,并确保员工知悉0.857
安全激励公司奖励为安全生产树立榜样的人0.9470.8770.9420.891
公司领导经常表扬员工的安全行为0.941
安全行为我在工作中时刻保持安全意识0.8440.8700.9060.660
我时刻遵守安全制度和操作规程0.906
我在工作中穿戴劳动防护用品0.880
我积极参加安全培训和安全会议0.868
我鼓励同事安全地作业0.888
工作意义我所做的工作对我来说非常有意义0.7000.7060.7930.563
工作上所做的事对我个人来说非常有意义0.737
我的工作对我来说非常重要0.719
自主效能我掌握了完成工作所需要的各项技能0.7430.7830.7820.545
我自信自己有干好工作上的各项事情的能力0.709
我对自己完成工作的能力非常有信心0.769
自主性我自己可以决定如何来着手做我的工作0.7320.7050.7520.505
在如何完成工作上,我有很大的独立性和自主权0.715
在决定如何完成我的工作上,我有很大的自主权0.726
工作影响我对发生在本部门的事情的影响很大0.7860.7910.7360.586
我对发生在本部门的事情起着很大的控制作用0.753
我对发生在本部门的事情有重大影响0.769

Fig.3

Results of sample descriptive statistical analysis"

Table 2

Validity analysis of measurement model"

安全管理承诺安全交流安全培训安全激励安全行为工作影响工作意义自主性自主效能
安全管理承诺0.820
安全交流0.6950.898
安全培训0.6210.8070.944
安全激励0.8000.7180.7310.876
安全行为0.7500.8810.8120.8170.892
工作影响0.4700.5160.4390.5660.5090.697
工作意义0.5300.5370.4570.4860.6880.2880.751
自主性0.6260.5200.5000.5970.5010.4010.3810.711
自主效能0.5470.5000.5440.5410.5710.4170.4590.5300.738

Table 3

Results of model path test"

路径关系路径系数T检验结果
安全管理承诺→工作意义0.1360.992不成立
安全管理承诺→自我效能感0.2762.300成立
安全管理承诺→自主性0.3643.253成立
安全管理承诺→工作影响0.2211.546成立
安全培训→工作意义0.2632.023成立
安全培训→自我效能感0.1390.976不成立
安全培训→自主性-0.1841.681成立
安全培训→工作影响-0.2051.602成立
安全交流→工作意义0.2381.837成立
安全交流→自我效能感0.2802.295成立
安全交流→自主性0.4073.591成立
安全交流→工作影响0.5313.951成立
安全激励→工作意义0.0800.805不成立
安全激励→自我效能感0.0150.148不成立
安全激励→自主性0.2242.329成立
安全激励→工作影响-0.1271.043不成立
工作意义→安全行为0.2003.895成立
自我效能感→安全行为0.1802.168成立
自主性→安全行为0.6962.580成立
工作影响→安全行为-0.1700.185不成立

Table 4

Results of mediation effect test"

模型类型自变量路径系数TR2
无中介变量模型安全管理承诺0.4812.0370.583
安全交流0.4954.026
安全激励0.1552.531
安全培训0.2763.463
有中介变量模型安全管理承诺0.2692.7520.768
安全交流0.3323.427
安全激励0.2701.465
安全培训0.2641.983
Cakit E,Jan Olak A,Murata A,al et,2019.Assessment of the perceived safety culture in the petrochemical industry in Japan:A cross-sectional study[J].Plos One,14(12):e022 6416.
Cao Qingren,Li Kai,Liu Lina,2011.Empirical study on impact of coalmine safety culture on miner’s safety behavior[J].China Safety Science Journal,21(4):143-149.
Cooper M D,2000.Towards a model of safety culture[J].Safety Science,36(2):111-136.
Cui Xiaotong,2018.The Basis of Attitude Towards Occupational Safety and Health Behavior:The Influence of Psychological Empowerment[D].Beijing:China University of Mining and Technology.
Dai Zhuan,Luo Zhouquan,Qin Yaguang,al et,2019.Construction and evaluation of generalized safety management model for underground metal mines[J].Gold Science and Technology,27(6):920-930.
Ding Lin,Xi Youmin,2007.How transformational leadership influences subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior—The effect of empowerment behavior and psychological empowerment[J].Management Review,(10):24-29,63.
Fang Yexiang,Qin Long,Zhang Lin,al et,2019.Influence of safety culture and the sense of job satisfaction on the safety behaviors of the employees—An empirical research on the structural equation model[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,19(6):2022-2032.
Fu Gui,Wang Xiangyao,Ji Hongwen,al et,2011.Analysis of contributing factors to safety culture based on structural equation model[J].China Safety Science Journal,21(2):9-15.
Fu Gui,Yin Wentao,Dong Jiye,al et,2013.Behavior-based accident causation:The “2-4” model and its safety implications in coal mines[J].Journal of China Coal Society,38(7):1123-1129.
Fu Jing,Fu Gui,Zhang Jiangshi,al et,2019.Approach to the production safety culture deficiencies in the coal mine enterprises based on the 24Model[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,19(6):2033-2040.
Gottfredson R K,Wright S L,Heaphy E D,2020.A critique of the leader-member exchange construct:Back to square one[J].The Leadership Quarterly,31(6):101385.
Kuo N T,Cheng Y S,Chang K C,al et,2020.Establishing a measurement scale for safety culture in the hotel industry[J].Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,42:12-28.
Li Chaoping,Tian Bao,Shi Kan,2006.Transformational leadership and employee work attitudes:The mediating effects of multidimensional psychological empowerment[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,(2):297-307.
Li Siqi,2018.Research on the Influence of Person-Job Fit Degree on Unsafe Behavior of Coal Miners[D].Xi’an:Xi’an University of Science and Technology.
Mei Qiang,Zhang Chao,Li Wen,al et,2017.Relationship among safety culture,safety climate and staffs’ safety bahavior—An empirical analysis of SEMs in high-risk industry[J].Journal of Systems & Management,26(2):277-286.
Minh T T,Feng Y,2020.Impact of project complexity on construction safety performance:Moderating role of resilient safety culture[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,146(2):04019103.
Moreira F G P,Ramos A L F,Fonseca K R C,2021.Safety culture maturity in a civil engineering academic laboratory[J].Safety Science,134:105076.
Schulman P R,2020.Organizational structure and safety culture:Conceptual and practical challenges[J].Safety Science,126:104669.
Usman M,Ali M,Ogbonnaya C,al et,2021.Fueling the intrapreneurial spirit:A closer look at how spiritual leadership motivates employee intrapreneurial behaviors[J].Tourism Management,83:104227.
Van Nunen K,Li J,Reniers G,al et,2018.Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research[J].Safety Science,108:248-258.
Wang Dan,Gong Jingjing,2016.Sem of leadership behavior,safety culture and safety behavior of miners[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,12(9):188-192.
Wang Hao,2019.Study on the influence of safety culture of mining enterprises on the safety behavior of workers[J].Mining Technology,19(1):91-93.
Wei Jianping,2018.Construction of safety culture in metal mining enterprises[J].China High-Tech,(13):121-123.
Xie Zhenhua,Zhang Yuanyuan,Yang Jing,2012.Safety culture construction evaluation and management information system in metal mines[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,8(11):165-168.
Ye Xinfeng,Li Xinchun,Wang Zhining,2014.Safety climate and safety behavior—The mediating role of psychological capital[J].Soft Science,28(1):86-90.
Yu Guangtao,Wang Erping,2004.Safety culture’s contents,causes and working mechanism[J].Advances in Psychological Science,(1):87-95.
Zhang Shu,2012.Empirical Study of Managers Safety Behavior in Mine Enterprises[D].Changsha:Central South University.
Zhang Y,Zheng Y,Zhang L,al et,2019.A meta-analytic review of the consequences of servant leadership:The moderating roles of cultural factors[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,1-30.
Zheng Xiazhong,Li Huafei,Mao Yuting,2011.Application of safety culture maturity model in construction enterprises[J].China Safety Science Journal,21(6):88-93.
Zwetsloot G,Van Kampen J,Steijn W,al et,2020.Ranking of process safety cultures for risk-based inspections using indicative safety culture assessments[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 64:104065.
曹庆仁,李凯,刘丽娜,2011.煤矿安全文化对员工行为安全影响作用的实证研究[J].中国安全科学学报,21(4):143-149.
崔晓彤,2018.职业安全健康行为的态度基础研究:心理授权的影响[D].北京:中国矿业大学.
代转,罗周全,秦亚光,等,2019.地下金属矿山广义安全管理模型构建及评价[J].黄金科学技术,27(6):920-930.
丁琳,席酉民,2007.变革型领导如何影响下属的组织公民行为——授权行为与心理授权的作用[J].管理评论,(10):24-29,63.
方叶祥,秦龙,张琳,等,2019.安全文化、工作满意度对员工安全行为的影响——基于结构方程模型的实证研究[J].安全与环境学报,19(6):2022-2032.
傅贵,王祥尧,吉洪文,等,2011.基于结构方程模型的安全文化影响因子分析[J].中国安全科学学报,21(2):9-15.
傅贵,殷文韬,董继业,等,2013.行为安全“2-4”模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用[J].煤炭学报,38(7):1123-1129.
付净,傅贵,张江石,等,2019.基于24Model的煤矿企业安全文化缺欠表征研究[J].安全与环境学报,19(6):2033-2040.
李超平,田宝,时勘,2006.变革型领导与员工工作态度:心理授权的中介作用[J].心理学报,(2):297-307.
李思琦,2018.煤矿工人人—岗匹配度对不安全行为的影响研究[D].西安:西安科技大学.
梅强,张超,李雯,等,2017.安全文化、安全氛围与员工安全行为关系研究——基于高危行业中小企业的实证[J].系统管理学报,26(2):277-286.
王丹,宫晶晶,2016.领导行为、安全文化与矿工安全行为的结构方程模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,12(9):188-192.
王浩,2019.矿山企业安全文化对职工行为安全影响研究[J].采矿技术,19(1):91-93.
韦建平,2018.金属矿山企业的安全文化构建[J].中国高新科技,(13):121-123.
谢振华,张媛媛,杨静,2012.金属矿山企业安全文化建设评价及管理信息系统[J].中国安全生产科学技术,8(11):165-168.
叶新凤,李新春,王智宁,2014.安全氛围对员工安全行为的影响——心理资本中介作用的实证研究[J].软科学,28(1):86-90.
于广涛,王二平,2004.安全文化的内容、影响因素及作用机制[J].心理科学进展,(1):87-95.
张舒,2012.矿山企业管理者安全行为实证研究[D].长沙:中南大学.
郑霞忠,李华飞,毛玉婷,2011.安全文化成熟度模型在施工企业中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报,21(6):88-93.
[1] Guangxu RONG, Zongyang LI. Application of CNN-LSTM Model in Slope Reliability Analysis [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2023, 31(4): 613-623.
[2] Shuang HUANG, Mingtao JIA, Fang LU. Optimization Model of Underground Stope Working Plan Based on Heuristic Genetic Algorithm [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2023, 31(4): 669-679.
[3] Zhixiang LIU,Kai WANG,Xiaocong YANG,Chuanchuan WAN,Yucheng ZHOU. Reliability Analysis of Intelligent Shoveling System Based on Fuzzy Fault Tree and Monte Carlo Method [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2023, 31(3): 477-486.
[4] Jielin LI,Dehua MAO,Chaozhi PENG,Shengli WANG,Mengbing FENG,Mingliang ZHAO,Ao LI. A Study of Construction Technology and Application of Pulp-Soil Decline at an Underground Metal Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2022, 30(6): 901-911.
[5] Zhenyu NIE,Keping ZHOU,Zhipeng LIANG. Teaching and Training of Mine Roof Fall Accident Based on VR Technology [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(4): 620-628.
[6] Lipeng WANG,Fang YAN,Zijun LI,Fang WANG. Dynamic Status Evaluation of Main Fans of Mine at High Altitude Region [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(6): 930-939.
[7] Meng WANG, Xiuzhi SHI, Shu ZHANG. Evaluation Research on Safety Guarantee Conditions of Underground Metal Mines Oriented to Optimizing Production Capacity [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(5): 753-760.
[8] Guoyan ZHAO,Ju QIU,Yuan ZHAO,Dianfei PEI,Yang LI,Pan WU. Discussion on Evaluation Method of Green Mining in Metal Mines [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(2): 169-175.
[9] Rongrong LI,Zijun LI,Yilong HUANG,Shuqi ZHAO. Ventilation Mode Optimization of Mining Face at High Altitude Based on ANP [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(2): 301-308.
[10] Xiaoming LIU,Lei DENG,Liguan WANG,Shunhua DENG,Xinfeng YANG,You WAN,Yanjun HE. Intelligent Mine Master Plan for Underground Metal Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(2): 309-316.
[11] Li CHENG,Huanxin LIU,Mingde ZHU,Qinzheng WU. Current Situation and Prospect of Research on Underground Goaf in Metal Mines [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(1): 70-81.
[12] Zhuan DAI,Zhouquan LUO,Yaguang QIN,Lei WEN,Chunsheng DING,Zhezhe DONG. Construction and Evaluation of Generalized Safety Management Model for Underground Metal Mines [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(6): 920-930.
[13] Jiacong JIN,Qingfa CHEN. Innovative Mindsets and Innovative Techniques of Synergetic Mining Methods [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(5): 712-721.
[14] Jiayuan CAO,Fengshan MA,Jie GUO,Guodong ZHANG,Zhaoping LI. Study on Subsidence Prediction of Inclined Orebody Cut and Fill Mining in Seabed [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(4): 522-529.
[15] Guoyan ZHAO,Haiyun ZHANG,Jian LIU,Ying CHEN. GSO-GPR Model for Strata Displacement Angle Predicting and Its Application [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(1): 63-71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!