img

Wechat

Adv. Search

Gold Science and Technology ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 740-746.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2019.05.740

• Mining Technology and Mine Management • Previous Articles    

Risk Assessment of Filling Pipeline Wearing Based on Improved PCA and Ordered Multi-class Logistic

Shi WANG(),Yi TANG(),Xiao FENG   

  1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China
  • Received:2018-08-14 Revised:2018-12-11 Online:2019-10-31 Published:2019-11-07
  • Contact: Yi TANG E-mail:stonersxx@126.com;tylwtfglsm@163.com

Abstract:

The filling mining method is mainstream mining method used in major mines today.The safe implementation of filling technology depends on the construction of a good filling pipeline transportation system.Considering the complexity of the filled pipeline system and the large number and variety of influencing factors,in order to accurately predict the wear risk of the filling pipeline of the mine,a wear risk assessment of the filling pipeline based on the improved PCA and the ordered multi-class Logistic regression combination model was built.On the basis of practical experience,a total of 12 items including the volume fraction of the filling slurry,the filling doubled line,the corrosiveness of the filling slurry,and the material of the pipe were selected.Reasonable risk levels were divided according to the characteristics of each indicator and the corresponding evaluation model was constructed.The filling production data of four mines such as Jinchuan Longshou mine and Dahongshan copper mine were taken as samples.The improved PCA algorithm was used to analyze the correlation of each index,and the three principal components with a cumulative contribution rate of 91.125% and factor load of the principal component of each indicator were obtained.In the end,the two indicators with low correlation and small influence index,the density of the filling slurry(27.75) and the corrosiveness of the filling slurry(27.60) were deleted.The preferred main indicators were substituted into the ordered multi-class Logistic regression model,the continuous indicator values were linearly fitted to the discrete risk levels,and the regression coefficients,standard errors and significance levels of each index were calculated,and the equations of probability fluctuations were solved. Finally,the probability of four mines corresponding to different wear risks Ⅰ(not easy to wear),Ⅱ(relatively easy to wear),Ⅲ(easy to wear),Ⅳ(very easy to wear) were obtained. They were: Jinchuan Longshou mine is 0.247,0.440,0.154,0.153; Dahongshan copper mine is 0.179,0.240,0.323,0.258; Hedong gold mine is 0.181,0.227,0.345,0.247; Xincheng gold mine is 0.181,0.227,0.345,0.247.From a theoretical point of view,the risk level corresponding to the probability of the largest value was used as the final judgment level of the wear risk of the mine filling pipeline,and Jinchuan Longshou mine is Ⅱ,Dahongshan copper mine is Ⅲ,Hedong gold mine is Ⅲ,Xincheng gold mine is Ⅲ. The mine also makes corresponding level protection and maintenance measures based on this.From the actual production application,it is said that the probability of the Ⅳ risk level should be paid special attention,and the normal operation of the filling pipeline should be guaranteed to the greatest extent within the scope permitted by technology and funds. The mathematical method combining improved PCA and ordered multi-class Logistic regression avoids the collinearity between the various indicators,reduces the interference of the weak indicators on the evaluation results,and obtains the accurate risk of wear risk of filling the pipeline.It provides a theoretical basis for scientific prediction of pipeline wear risk and the implementation of effective and economical protection measures for similar mines.The mine can construct an appropriate filling pipeline protection system according to its own development.

Key words: filling pipeline wearing, improve principal component analysis, ordered multi-class Logistic regression, wear risk, probability of risk level

CLC Number: 

  • TD85

Table 1

Range of values for quantitative indicator evaluation level"

磨损等级充填料浆体积分数/%充填料浆密度/(t·m-3)粗颗粒占比/%管道内径/mm管道铺设不平整度/%管道绝对糙度/μm充填倍线料浆流速与临界流速之比管道使用年限/a
I1<30I2<1.5I3<20I4>200I5<1.0I6≤100I7≥7.0I8<1.0I10<2
30≤I1<401.5≤I2<1.720≤I3<40150< I4≤2001.0≤I5<3.0I6≤1005.0≤I7<7.01.0≤I8<1.22≤I10<5
40≤I1<501.7≤I2<1.940≤I3<60100< I4≤1503.0≤I5<5.0300≤I6<5003.0≤I7<5.01.2≤I8<1.55≤I10<10
I1≥50I2≥1.9I3≥60I4≤100I5≥5.0I6≥5001.0≤I7<3.0I8≥1.5I10≥10

Table 2

Range of values for qualitative indicator evaluation level"

磨损等级充填骨料形状充填料浆腐蚀性管道材料
圆形或椭圆形中性并且不含有能与充填管道发生反应的成分双金属耐磨复合管
方形特定条件下pH值发生变化与充填管道发生反应钢塑复合管
多棱角形弱酸、弱碱以及一系列能与充填管道发生轻微反应的成分陶瓷复合管
极不规则强酸、强碱或一系列容易与充填管道发生反应的成分单一复合材料

Table 3

Survey data on the impact indicators of mine filling pipelines"

矿山名称I1I2I3I4I5I6I7I8I9I10I11I12
金川龙首矿561.98381992.723003.21.38122
大红山铜矿331.69421600.985009.63.07332
河东金矿241.6852820.561005.21.610323
新城金矿521.94331071.272005.83.56431

Table 4

Factor load of principal component and index of influence of various factors"

主成分I1I2I3I4I5I6I7I8I9I10I11I12
Z1-0.65-0.180.229-0.39-0.460.5510.7170.2020.2340.3750.0930.262
Z2-0.140.840.2240.4110.2370.2060.7910.437-0.23-0.39-0.100.137
Z30.54-0.010.3710.6460.2260.0850.0970.3010.1380.5990.4350.239
Bi42.0627.7537.4435.7534.6139.7738.1430.4737.8936.7127.6033.71

Table 5

Logistic regression model of pipeline wear risk"

变量回归系数标准误差显著性水平
I10.35070.31080.1128
I30.03720.18260.3972
I4-0.10550.26860.0293
I5-0.04690.17820.2833
I60.24160.13060.0633
I70.28170.10260.0375
I80.09830.17720.3985
I90.24780.18120.1755
I10-0.29280.14280.0427
I120.27930.16420.0694
β1.78550.76340.0259

Table 6

Pipeline wear risk rating for four mines"

矿山名称各风险等级概率
金川龙首矿0.2470.4400.1540.153
大红山铜矿0.1790.2400.3230.258
河东金矿0.1810.2270.3450.247
新城金矿0.1700.2300.4180.182

Table 7

Comparison of risk assessment results of different models"

矿山名称综合风险等级
基于改进PCA与多分类Logistic回归主客观组合权重与可变模糊模型未确知测度综合评价模型
金川龙首矿
大红山铜矿
河东金矿
新城金矿
1 WangS,LiS,QinJ C,et al. Effect of anionic polyacrylamide on the structural stability of thickened tailings slurry in pipeline transportation[J].Advances in Materials Science and Engineering,2018. DOI:10.1155/2018/7131487.
doi: 10.1155/2018/7131487
2 LiuZ X,DangW G,LiuQ L,et al. Optimization of clay material mixture ratio and filling process in gypsum mine goaf[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2013,23(3): 337-342.
3 李夕兵,刘冰.硬岩矿山充填开采现状评述与探索[J]. 黄金科学技术,2018,26(4): 492-502.
LiXibing,LiuBing.Review and exploration of current situation of backfill mining in hard rock mines[J].Gold Science and Technology,2018,26(4):492-502.
4 SivakuganN,VeenstraR,NaguleswaranN. Underground mine backfilling in Australia using paste fills and hydraulic fills[J]. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering,2015,1(2):18.
5 丁文军,李广辉,丁志浩. 某金矿充填系统优化改造[J]. 黄金科学技术,2016,24(4): 87-91.
DingWenjun,LiGuanghui,DingZhihao.Optimization of filling system for a gold mine[J].Gold Science and Technology,2016,24(4):87-91.
6 GuptaA K,PaulB. A review on utilisation of coal mine overburden dump waste as underground mine filling material:A sustainable approach of mining[J]. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering,2015,6(2): 172-186.
7 王贤来,郑晶晶,张钦礼,等. 充填钻孔内管道磨损的影响因素及保护措施[J]. 矿冶工程,2009,29(5): 9-12.
WangXianlai,ZhengJingjing,ZhangQinli,et al. Influencing factors on the abrasion of pipelines in backfill drilling and protective measures[J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering,2009,29(5): 9-12.
8 张钦礼,郑晶晶,王新民,等. 充填管道磨损形式及机理分析研究[J]. 金属矿山,2009,39(5): 115-118.
ZhangQinli,ZhengJingjing,WangXinmin,et al. A study of the abrasion form and mechanism of backfilling pipelines[J]. Metal Mine,2009,39(5): 115-118.
9 张德明,王新民,郑晶晶,等. 深井充填钻孔内管道磨损机理及成因分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报,2010,32(13): 100-105.
ZhangDeming,WangXinmin,ZhengJingjing,et al. Wear mechanism and causes of backfilling drill-holes pipelines in deep mine[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology,2010,32(13): 100-105.
10 毛明发,王炳文,朱家锐,等. 充填料浆自流输送管道磨损机理研究[J]. 金属矿山,2018,47(4): 178-184.
MaoMingfa,WangBingwen,ZhuJiarui,et al. Study on wear mechanism of gravity transportation pipeline for backfilling slurry[J]. Metal Mine,2018,47(4): 178-184.
11 梅晓,李兴华,孔贺,等. 膏体充填管道磨损机理分析[J]. 煤炭技术,2016,35(7): 274-276.
MeiXiao,LiXinghua,KongHe,et al. Analysis on wear mechanism of backfill paste[J]. Coal Technology,2016,35(7): 274-276.
12 薛希龙,王新民,张钦礼. 充填管道磨损风险评估的组合权重与可变模糊耦合模型[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,47(11): 3752-3758.
XueXilong,WangXinmin,ZhangQinli. An integrated model of combination weights and variable fuzzy on evaluating backfill pipeline wear risk[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2016,47(11): 3752-3758.
13 丁文军,李广辉,丁志浩.某金矿充填系统优化改造[J].黄金科学技术,2016,24(4):87-91.
DingWenjun,LiGuanghui,DingZhihao.Optimization of filling system for a gold mine[J].Gold Science and Technology,2016,24(4):87-91.
14 叶永飞,张雅楠,李士超,等. 循环载荷下胶结充填体损伤声发射表征[J]. 黄金科学技术,2018,26(6): 819-825.
YeYongfei,ZhangYanan,LiShichao,et al.Acoustic emission characterization of damage of cemented filling under cyclic loading[J].Gold Science and Technology,2018,26(6):819-825.
15 唐勇波,桂卫华,彭涛,等. PCA和KICA特征提取的的变压器故障诊断模型[J].高压电技术,2014,40(2): 557-563.
TangYongbo,GuiWeihua,PengTao,et al. Transfomer fault diagnosis model based on PCA and KICA feature extraction[J].High Voltage Engineering,2014,40(2): 557-563.
16 王培良,夏春江. 基于PCA-PDBNs的故障检测与自学习辨识[J]. 仪器仪表学报,2015,36(5): 1147-1154.
WangPeiliang,XiaChunjiang. Fault detection and self-learning identification based on PCA-PDBNs[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument,2015,36(5): 1147-1154.
17 赵琳,边扬,荣建,等. 基于有序Logistic回归的城市人行道服务水平研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2014,14(4): 131-138.
ZhaoLin,BianYang,RongJian,et al. Pedestrian LOS of urban sidewalks based on orderly Logistic regression[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2014,14(4): 131-138.
18 白少布. 基于有序Logistic模型的企业供应链融资模型融资风险预警研究[J]. 经济经纬,2010(6): 66-71.
BaiShaobu. Research on early warning of financing risk of enterprise supply chain financing model based on ordered Logistic model[J]. Economic Survey,2010(6): 66-71.
19 王瑷玲,石宁,陈欣玉,等. 基于有序Logistic回归的农村院落建设影响因素研究[J]. 农林经济管理学报,2017,16(6): 776-782.
WangAiling,ShiNing,ChenXinyu,et al. Factors influencing rural courtyard construction based on ordinal Logistic regression[J].Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management,2017,16(6): 776-782.
20 郑晶晶,张钦礼,王新民,等. 充填管道系统失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)及失效影响模糊评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2009,19(6): 166-171.
ZhengJingjing,ZhangQinli,WangXinmin,et al. FMEA analysis of backfilling pipeline system and fuzzy evaluation of failure effects[J].China Safety Science Journal,2009,19(6): 166-171.
21 王新民,王石,鄢德波,等. 基于未确知测度理论的充填管道堵塞风险性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2012,22(4): 151-156.
WangXinmin,WangShi,YanDebo,et al. Risk assessment on blocking of filling pipeline based on uncertainty measurement theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(4): 151-156.
[1] Enxiang SONG,Qiang LI,Jing ZHANG,Kang PENG. Research and Application of Artificial False Bottom in Mining of Orebody in Alteration Zone [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(5): 722-730.
[2] Jiacong JIN,Qingfa CHEN. Innovative Mindsets and Innovative Techniques of Synergetic Mining Methods [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(5): 712-721.
[3] Tianhang ZHANG,Xingdong ZHAO,Huaibin LI,Yifan ZHAO,Shujing ZHANG. Continuous Dry Filling of Long Room Method for Steeply Inclined and Medium Thick Orebody [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(5): 704-711.
[4] Jun TIAN,Jianpo LIU,Yong YANG,Changyin ZHANG. Study on the Failure Law of Backfill Induced by Blasting Disturbance During Cut and Fill Mining Process [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(5): 687-695.
[5] Ke JIANG,Ruihai KANG,Zhongliang YAO,Liang PENG. Study on the Optimal Concentration and Controlling Mode of Whole Tailings Flocculation Sedimentation [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(3): 440-448.
[6] Wenfeng XU,Yunzhang RAO,Shanghui LI,Wei XU. Analysis on Bleeding Performance of Filling Slurry with Bentonite [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(3): 433-439.
[7] Shuliang WU,Shan YANG,Wengang HUANG. Research on Mining Method Optimization Based on Concept Lattice Rough Set [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(2): 181-188.
[8] Chuanfeng FANG,Jinmiao WANG,Shanbing LI,Mingtao JIA. Numerical Simulation Research of Natural Caving Method Based on PFC2D-DFN [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(2): 189-198.
[9] Xiaohan LI,Kewei LIU,Jiacai YANG,Xudong LI. Analysis of Blasting Vibration Effects Under Different Ground Stress [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(2): 241-248.
[10] Nao LV,Haibo WANG. Numerical Simulation of Collapse Disaster Before and After Weakening of Thick and Hard Roof [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(2): 257-264.
[11] Zongnan LI,Lijie GUO,Xiaoming WEI,Xinzheng CHEN. Research on Flocculation and Settlement Mechanism of Tailings Slurry Disturbed [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(2): 265-270.
[12] Chao YANG,Lijie GUO,Jie WANG,Caixing SHI,Wenyuan XU. Study and Application of Large Fill-times-line Pressure Filling Technology in a Gold Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(1): 89-96.
[13] Shixing YANG,Yuhua FU,Fei ZHAN. Study on Post Peak Damage Evolution of Tailings Filling Body by Confining Pressure and Slurry Concentration [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(1): 97-104.
[14] Xinzheng CHEN,Lijie GUO,Wenchen LI,Zongnan LI. Experimental Study on Sedimentation and Concentration of Unclassified Tailings [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019, 27(1): 105-111.
[15] Yongfei YE,Yanan ZHANG,Shichao LI,Shirong CAO,Jianwen HAN,Xiaojun WANG. Acoustic Emission Characterization of Damage of Cemented Filling Under Cyclic Loading [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2018, 26(6): 819-825.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!