[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Executive Compensation Incentive,Strategic Change and Total Factor Productivity of Resource-Based Enterprises
Received date: 2024-05-29
Revised date: 2024-07-09
Online published: 2024-12-20
This study investigates the relationship between executive compensation incentives and the total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises,utilizing data from China Shanghai-Shenzhen A-share resource-based listed companies from 2012 to 2023.The findings indicate that:(1)Executive compensation incentives exhibit an inverted U-shaped effect on the total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises.This impact is particularly pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises,enterprises situated downstream in the industrial chain,and resource-based enterprises during their growth and decline phases.(2)Strategic change serves as an intermediary mechanism linking executive compensation incentives to the total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises.Appropriately calibrated executive compensation incentives facilitate strategic change within these enterprises,subsequently enhancing their total factor productivity.Conversely,excessively high executive compensation incentives may impede strategic change,thereby diminishing total factor productivity.(3) Product market competition exhibits an inverted U-shaped moderating effect on the relationship between executive compensation incentives and the total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises.This competition smooths the curve and shifts the turning point to the right.Enhancing the level of competition within the product market can optimize the efficacy of executive compensation incentives,mitigate the rate of detrimental effects,and support the long-term strategic role of these incentives.The conclusion have important decision enlightenment for resource-based enterprises to reasonably formulate incentive contract of executive compensation and improve total factor productivity.
Minggui ZHENG , Fangyu XU , Juan DONG . Executive Compensation Incentive,Strategic Change and Total Factor Productivity of Resource-Based Enterprises[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2024 , 32(6) : 1130 -1142 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2024.06.152
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2024/1005-2518/1005-2518-2024-32-6-1130.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
董静,邓浩然,赵国振,2020.CEO超额薪酬与战略变革——基于行为代理理论的研究[J].经济管理,42(10):137-155.
|
|
胡珺,方祺,龙文滨,2023.碳排放规制、企业减排激励与全要素生产率——基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验[J].经济研究,58(4):77-94.
|
|
黄先海,高亚兴,2023.数实产业技术融合与企业全要素生产率——基于中国企业专利信息的研究[J].中国工业经济,(11):118-136.
|
|
黄贤环,王瑶,2020.国有企业限薪抑制了全要素生产率的提升吗[J].上海财经大学学报,22(1):34-50.
|
|
黄永春,晁一方,彭荣,2022.高管团队薪酬差距、企业战略变革与突破性创新——内部控制的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,43(5):161-177.
|
|
简泽,谭利萍,吕大国,等,2017.市场竞争的创造性、破坏性与技术升级[J].中国工业经济,(5):16-34.
|
|
李晓庆,李萌菡,2022.国企混改、高管薪酬激励与全要素生产率[J].技术经济,41(9):36-49.
|
|
李馨子,牛煜皓,2023.高管会“攀比”薪酬吗?——来自国有企业集团的经验证据[J].管理评论,35(3):220-231.
|
|
刘鹏振,武文杰,顾恒,等,2023.政府补贴对高新技术企业绿色创新的影响研究——基于企业生命周期和产业集聚视角[J].软科学,37(10):9-15,24.
|
|
逯东,余渡,黄丹,等,2020.内部培养与外部空降:谁更能促进企业创新[J].中国工业经济,(10):157-174.
|
|
马红旗,申广军,2020.产能过剩与全要素生产率的估算:基于中国钢铁企业的分析[J].世界经济,43(8):170-192.
|
|
马健,林树,2021.产权性质、地区发展水平差异与非效率投资[J].世界经济与政治论坛,348(5):65-86.
|
|
马庆魁,樊梦晨,2021.管理层激励、机构投资者持股与企业异质研发[J].科研管理,42(9):140-149.
|
|
盛宇华,王新光,2022.管理者能力与战略变革——基于连锁股东与高管薪酬粘性的调节分析[J].软科学,36(5):89-94.
|
|
唐国平,孙洪锋,2022.环境规制、风险补偿与高管薪酬——基于新《环境保护法》实施的经验证据[J].经济管理,44(7):140-158.
|
|
唐松,苏雪莎,赵丹妮,2022.金融科技与企业数字化转型——基于企业生命周期视角[J].财经科学,(2):17-32.
|
|
王锋正,刘向龙,张蕾,等,2022.数字化促进了资源型企业绿色技术创新吗?[J].科学学研究,40 (2):332-344.
|
|
王海成,张伟豪,夏紫莹,2023.产业规模偏好与企业全要素生产率——来自省级政府五年规划文本的证据[J].经济研究,58(5):153-171.
|
|
王洪盾,岳华,张旭,2019.公司治理结构与公司绩效关系研究——基于企业全要素生产率的视角[J].上海经济研究,(4):17-27.
|
|
王琳,李欢,高伊琳,等,2022.信息披露质量对企业声誉的影响及作用机制——基于上海电气财务爆雷事件的案例分析[J].管理评论,34(8):341-352.
|
|
王延霖,郭晓川,2020.资源型上市公司高管团队激励方式对企业创新效率的影响研究——基于创新价值链和产权性质的考量[J].研究与发展管理,32(4):149-161.
|
|
温忠麟,叶宝娟,2014.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,22(5):731-745.
|
|
吴先明,张楠,赵奇伟,2017.工资扭曲、种群密度与企业成长:基于企业生命周期的动态分析[J].中国工业经济,(10):137-155.
|
|
席振鑫,马丽,金凤君,等,2023.黄河流域典型资源型城市工业转型的时空特征、类型与路径[J].资源科学,45(10):1977-1991.
|
|
阎俊爱,安韬,周芳玲,等,2020.资源型企业转型路径研究——基于四家企业的案例研究[J].经济问题,(4):104-113.
|
|
阎晓,涂建军,2021.黄河流域资源型城市生态效率时空演变及驱动因素[J].自然资源学报,36(1):223-239.
|
|
于左,吴绪亮,2013.产业组织理论前沿与公共政策——2013年产业组织前沿问题研讨会综述[J].经济研究,48(10):151-154.
|
|
张安军,叶彤,2022.产品市场竞争、财政补贴与资本配置效率[J].财经论丛,(5):34-45.
|
|
张骁,王娟娟,2024.数字经济时代企业高成长机理研究——战略节奏视角[J].中国工业经济,(2):173-192.
|
|
郑明贵,董娟,钟昌标,2022.资本深化对资源型企业全要素生产率的影响[J].资源科学,44(3):536-553.
|
|
郑明贵,邱均远,顾东明,等,2023.自愿性环境规制对资源型企业高管薪酬的影响研究[J].黄金科学技术,31(5):811-822.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |