[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Gold Science and Technology >

2023 , Vol. 31 >Issue 6: 978 - 989

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2023.06.039

Mining Technology and Mine Management

Study on the Configuration Path of Digital Transformation of Resource-based Enterprises

  • Minggui ZHENG , 1, 2 ,
  • Dongming GU , 1 ,
  • Simin TAO 1 ,
  • Meiling CHEN 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
  • 2. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China

Received date: 2023-03-03

  Revised date: 2023-06-28

  Online published: 2024-01-26

Fold

Abstract

Promoting the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises is an effective path to crack the development dilemma of enterprises and achieve high-quality development.Due to the significant differences in resource-based enterprises’ resource endowments and transformation capabilities，the degree of digital transformation also shows significant differences.So，what combination of influencing factors can effectively promote the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises？What are the differentiated transformation paths that different resource-based enterprises should follow？At the same time，the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises is a complex systemic project，and previous studies are limited in exploring it only from a single dimension.This paper took resource-based enterprises in China as the research object，from the perspective of “pressure-capacity-drive”，it refined into six antecedent conditions：market competition，growth capability，resource integration capability，innovation capability，enterprise size and financial support.Using NCA and fsQCA methods，it analyzed the relationship between the six antecedent conditions and the NCA and fsQCA methods were used to analyze the complex causal relationships between the six antecedent conditions and the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises.The study found that：The digital transformation of resource-based enterprises is not driven by a single condition，but it is the result of the synergy of multiple conditions.There are three types of groupings that generate high-level digital transformation，namely，the innovation capability-driven type that responds to pressure，the government-led type under pressure and the comprehensive-driven type，mainly by SMEs.There are two types of groupings that generate non-high-level digital transformation，namely，the settled type and the type with both weak innovation capability and drive.And market competition plays a key role in the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises.The results of the study reveal the interaction between various factors in the digital transformation of different resource-based enterprises，which can provide theoretical guidance and path references for resource-based enterprises to realise digital transformation.

Key words： resource-based enterprises; digital transformation; configuration path; synergy linkage effect; NCA method; fsQCA method

Cite this article

Minggui ZHENG , Dongming GU , Simin TAO , Meiling CHEN . Study on the Configuration Path of Digital Transformation of Resource-based Enterprises[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2023 , 31(6) : 978 -989 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2023.06.039

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2023/1005-2518/1005-2518-2023-31-6-978.shtml

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
Bell R G， Filatotchev I， Aguilera R V，2014.Corporate governance and investors’perceptions of foreign IPO Value：An institutional perspective［J］.Academy of Management Jou-rnal，57（1）：301-320.

Chen Lianfang， Huang Weize，2017.Economic globalization’s effects on development of mineral resources industry in China and countermeasures［J］.China Mining Magazine，26（4）：21-27.

Cheng Qiongwen， Ding Hongyi，2022.Research on the impact of tax incentives on the digital transform of resource-based enterprises［J］.Chinese Journal of Management，19（8）：1125-1133.

Doblinger C， Surana K， Anadon L D，2019.Governments as partners：The role of alliances in U.S. cleantech startup innovation［J］.Research Policy，48（6）：1458-1475.

Du Yunzhou， Jia Liangding，2017.Group perspective and qualitative comparative analysis（QCA）：A new path for management research［J］.Management World，（6）：155-167.

Du Yunzhou， Liu Qiuchen， Cheng Jianqing，2020.What kind of ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial activity？A research based on institutional configurations［J］.Management World，36（9）：141-155.

Dul J，2018.Necessary condition analysis（NCA）：Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient”causality［J］.Social Science Electronic Publishing，（12）：455-466.

Dul J， Laan E， Kuik R，2020.A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis［J］.Sage Publications，23（2）：385-395.

Fiss P C，2011.Building better causal theories：A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research［J］.Academy of Management Journal，54（2）：393-420.

García-Quevedo J， Pellegrino G， Vivarelli M，2014.R&D drivers and age：Are young firms different？［J］.Research Policy，43（9）：1544-1556.

Gong Xinshu， Jin Mei，2023.The impact of business environment and government support on enterprise digital transformation：An empirical study based on text mining of annual reports of listed companies［J］.Science and Technology Progress and Policy，40（2）：90-99.

Gong Yinyin， Duan Zongzhi，2022.Research on the critical path of digital transformation of construction enterprises considering scale differences［J］.Construction Economy，43（2）：84-90.

Greckhamer T， Furnari S， Fiss P C，et al，2018.Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis［J］.Strategic Organization，16（4）：482-495.

Guo Xiaochuan， Pan Yuyao， Du Yaru，2019.Research on new technology convergence，dynamic capability and performance of resource enterprises［J］.Scientific Management Research，37（6）：113-118.

Jiang Wen， Gui Bingxiu， Zhang Huyuan，et al，2023.Identification and empirical analysis of the driving factors of military industry digital transformation［J］.Journal of Industrial Technological Economics，42（1）：71-78.

Li Lei， Yang Shuili， Chen Na，2023.Antecedent configuration of digital transformation and its performance：Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed companies［J］.Science and Technology Progress and Policy，40（16）：32-41.

Ragin C C，2008.Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal order［J］.Sociological Methods and Research，36（4）：431-441.

Tang Song， Su Xuesha， Zhao Danni，2022.Fintech and enterprise digital transformation—From the perspective of enterprise life cycle［J］.Finance and Economics，407（2）：17-32.

Tong Yu，2022.Research on the influencing factors of manufacturing digital transformation［J］.Journal of Technical Economics and Management，308（3）：124-128.

Wang C L， Ahmed P K，2007.Dynamic capabilities：A review and research agenda［J］.International Journal of Management Reviews，9（1）：31-51.

Wang Fengzheng， Liu Yujia， Sun Yue，2020.Institutional environment，open innovation and transformation of resource-based enterprises［J］.Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures，37（5）：114-123.

Wang Ye， Chen Yang， Cui Xiao，2022.Change or stability：Research on the influence mechanism of dynamic capabilities on firm’s digital transformation［J］.Dongyue Tribune，43（8）：88-96.

Wu Fei， Chang Xi， Ren Xiaoyi，2021a.Government-driven innovation：Fiscal technology expenditure and enterprise digital transformation［J］.Fiscal Studies，455（1）：102-115.

Wu Fei， Hu Huizhi， Lin Huiyan，et al，2021b.Enterprise digital transformation and capital market performance：Empirical evidence from stock liquidity［J］.Journal of Management World，37（7）：130-144.

Wu Jiang， Chen Ting， Gong Yiwei，et al，2021.Digital transformation of firms：Theoretical framework and research prospects［J］.Chinese Journal of Management，18（12）：1871-1880.

Yu Desheng， Li Xing，2021.Enterprise financialization，product market competition and enterprise innovation ［J］.Financial Development Research，471（3）：20-25.

Zeng Hao，2022.Does market competition mechanism promote enterprise digital transformation？A quasi-natural experiment based on the negative list system of market access［J/OL］.Foreign Economics and Management：1-18［2023-12-07］.

Zhang Lingang， Dai Guoqing， Xiong Yan，et al，2022.Evaluation and influencing factors of digital transformation of the manufacturing industry in China：Based on qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy set［J］.Science and Technology Management Research，42（7）：68-78.

Zhang Ming， Chen Weihong， Lan Hailin，2019.Why do Chinese enterprises completely acquire foreign high-tech enterprises—A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis（fsQCA） based on 94 cases［J］.China Industrial Economics，（4）：117-135.

Zhang Xiaheng，2020.Obstacles，driving factors and path dependence of digital transformation of small and medium-sized enterprises—An investigation based on the survey of 377 small and medium-sized enterprises［J］.China Business and Market，34（12）：72-82.

Zhao Chenyu， Wang Wenchun， Li Xuesong，2021.How does digital transformation affect the total factor productivity of enterprises？［J］.Finance and Trade Economics，42（7）：114-129.

Zhao Feng， Wang Tienan， Wang Yu，2016.External technology acquisition in open innovation and product diversification：The moderating effect of dynamic capabilities［J］.Management Review，28（6）：76-85，99.

Zheng Minggui， Dong Juan， Zhong Changbiao，2022.Influence mechanism of capital deepening on total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises［J］.Resources Science，44（3）：536-553.

Zheng Minggui， Gu Dongming， Qiu Junyuan，2023.Analysis on the configuration path of regional green development：Based on TOE theoretical framework［J］.Finance and Accounting Monthly，44（12）：124-130.

Zheng Minggui， You Biying， Wu Ping，2021.Can commercial credit financing promote the high quality development of mining enterprises—Based on the moderating effect of enterprise scale［J］.Gold Science and Technology，29（6）：874-883.

陈莲芳，黄伟泽，2017.经济全球化对我国矿产资源产业发展的影响及对策［J］.中国矿业，26（4）：21-27.

成琼文，丁红乙，2022.税收优惠对资源型企业数字化转型的影响研究［J］.管理学报，19（8）：1125-1133.

杜运周，贾良定，2017.组态视角与定性比较分析（QCA）：管理学研究的一条新道路［J］.管理世界，（6）：155-167.

杜运周，刘秋辰，程建青，2020.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度？——基于制度组态的分析［J］.管理世界，36（9）：141-155.

龚新蜀，靳媚，2023.营商环境与政府支持对企业数字化转型的影响——来自上市企业年报文本挖掘的实证［J］.科技进步与对策，40（2）：90-99.

龚银银，段宗志，2022.考虑规模差异的建筑企业数字化转型关键路径研究［J］.建筑经济，43（2）：84-90.

郭晓川，潘雨瑶，杜雅茹，2019.新技术融合、动态能力与资源型企业绩效研究［J］.科学管理研究，37（6）：113-118.

蒋雯，桂秉修，张湖源，等，2023.军工企业数字化转型驱动因素识别及实证分析［J］.工业技术经济，42（1）：71-78.

李雷，杨水利，陈娜，2023.数字化转型的前因组态与绩效研究——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据［J］.科技进步与对策，40（16）：32-41.

唐松，苏雪莎，赵丹妮，2022.金融科技与企业数字化转型——基于企业生命周期视角［J］.财经科学，407（2）：17-32.

童雨，2022.中国制造业数字化转型的影响因素研究［J］.技术经济与管理研究，308（3）：124-128.

王锋正，刘宇嘉，孙玥，2020.制度环境、开放式创新与资源型企业转型［J］.科技进步与对策，37（5）：114-123.

王晔，陈洋，崔箫，2022.求变还是求稳：动态能力对企业数字化转型的影响机制研究［J］.东岳论丛，43（8）：88-96.

吴非，常曦，任晓怡，2021a.政府驱动型创新：财政科技支出与企业数字化转型［J］.财政研究，455（1）：102-115.

吴非，胡慧芷，林慧妍，等，2021b.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据［J］.管理世界，37（7）：130-144.

吴江，陈婷，龚艺巍，等，2021.企业数字化转型理论框架和研究展望［J］.管理学报，18（12）：1871-1880.

余得生，李星，2021.企业金融化、产品市场竞争与企业创新［J］.金融发展研究，471（3）：20-25.

曾皓，2022.市场竞争机制促进了企业数字化转型吗？——基于市场准入负面清单制度的准自然实验［J/OL］.外国经济与管理：1-18［2023-12-07］.

张林刚，戴国庆，熊焰，等，2022.中国制造业数字化转型评价及影响因素——基于模糊集定性比较分析［J］.科技管理研究，42（7）：68-78.

张明，陈伟宏，蓝海林，2019.中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业——基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA）［J］.中国工业经济，（4）：117-135.

张夏恒，2020.中小企业数字化转型障碍、驱动因素及路径依赖——基于对377家第三产业中小企业的调查［J］.中国流通经济，34（12）：72-82.

赵宸宇，王文春，李雪松，2021.数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率［J］.财贸经济，42（7）：114-129.

赵凤，王铁男，王宇，2016.开放式创新中的外部技术获取与产品多元化：动态能力的调节作用研究［J］.管理评论，28（6）：76-85，99.

郑明贵，董娟，钟昌标，2022.资本深化对中国资源型企业全要素生产率的影响［J］.资源科学，44（3）：536-553.

郑明贵，顾东明，邱均远，2023.地区绿色发展组态路径分析——基于TOE的理论框架［J］.财会月刊，44（12）：124-130.

郑明贵，尤碧莹，吴萍，2021.商业信用融资能否促进矿业企业高质量发展——基于企业规模的调节效应［J］.黄金科学技术，29（6）：874-883.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]