[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Life Cycle Assessment of Two Harmless Treatment Options for Gold Tailings
Received date: 2023-03-20
Revised date: 2023-05-25
Online published: 2023-11-21
The harmless treatment process of cyanide-containing gold tailings were used as the subject of study.The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method was applied to construct evaluation models for two options to quantitatively assess the environmental load and resource consumption of tailings press washing,filter residue treatment and filtrate treatment.The results show that:(1) The tailings toxicity level in Option 2 is 98.5% lower than that in Option 1,but does not achieve a lower overall environmental impact;(2) The main environmental issue in Option 1 is freshwater ecotoxicity,while the environmental impacts in Option 2 are,in descending order,resource depletion,freshwater ecotoxicity and human toxicity;(3) The Thiocyanide reduction with Fenton and dry stacking of tailings in Option 1 are the main links that affect the overall environment with the dry stacking of tailings contributing over 50% to human non-carcinogenic toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity,and the cyanide removal with Fenton from tailings in Option 2 is the most central issue in all 14 environmental impact indicators.The large number of chemicals used in both options is a major element of the environmental impact while electrical energy shows low environmental impact.The transfer of environmental impacts from Option 1 to Option 2 occurs in terms of form,volume and linkage.In terms of overall environmental impact,the treatment of tailings can move towards pharmaceutical reduction and the use of clean,environmentally friendly substances.
Sicheng LU , Rendong HUANG , Ying SHI . Life Cycle Assessment of Two Harmless Treatment Options for Gold Tailings[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2023 , 31(5) : 845 -855 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2023.05.044
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2023/1005-2518/1005-2518-2023-31-5-845.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China,2020. Standard for pollution control on the non-hazardous industrial solid waste storage and landfill:GB 18599-2020 [S].Beijing:Ministry of Ecology and Enviro-nment of the People’s Republic of China.
|
|
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China,2018. Technical specification for pollution control of cyanide leaching residue in gold industry:HJ 943-2018 [S].Beijing:Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
迟崇哲,翟菊彬,兰馨辉,等,2022.黄金尾矿综合利用分析[J].黄金,43(2):100-103.
|
|
迟春霞,2006.基于黄金矿山企业生命周期的发展战略研究[D].阜新:辽宁工程技术大学.
|
|
豆娜,赵福财,李玉玺,等,2021.亚硫酸氢钠—空气法处理氰化尾渣试验研究[J].有色冶金节能,37(4):20-24.
|
|
郭利杰,刘光生,马青海,等,2022.金属矿山充填采矿技术应用研究进展[J].煤炭学报,47(12):4182-4200.
|
|
李夕兵,刘冰,姚金蕊,等,2018.全磷废料绿色充填理论与实践[J].中国有色金属学报,28(9):1845-1865.
|
|
李夕兵,周健,黄麟淇,等,2020.中国黄金矿山开采技术回顾与展望[J].黄金,41(9):41-50.
|
|
刘蕴晗,刘朝峰,李一兵,等,2022.次氯酸钠强化芬顿法处理废水中次磷酸盐同步回收磷酸铁[J].环境科学学报,42(5):247-253.
|
|
吕翠翠,2017.氰化渣中有价元素资源化高效回收的应用基础研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院过程工程研究所).
|
|
孙旭阳,2016.H2O2/(Fe2+/Fe3+)体系均相催化氧化金矿废水中硫氰化物及再生氰化物的研究[D].大连:大连工业大学.
|
|
唐鹏,来威,李亚娜,等,2020.焦化酚氰废水工艺改进及综合利用[J].鞍钢技术,(1):40-42.
|
|
陶明,聂克蜜,成诗冰,等,2022.基于LCA方法的生态胶凝材料生产环境影响分析[J].安全与环境学报,22(4):2176-2183.
|
|
王尔珍,田飞,方玉峰,等,2022.超声—臭氧快速降解油田含聚洗井液的试验研究[J].工业水处理: 1-11[2023-10-17].DOI:10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2022- 1045 .
|
|
王茜茜,吴凯建,王路,2022.白云鄂博矿绿色矿山建设碳排放研究[J].内蒙古科技大学学报,41(1):12-16.
|
|
王文强,包允,张全真,2021.两次沉淀法处理含氰废水的实验研究[J].山东化工,50(23):231-232.
|
|
吴百苗,张一梅,栗帅,等,2022.基于LCA的污水处理方案碳中和综合影响评价[J].环境工程,40(6):130-137.
|
|
许小泉,2022.基于LCA方法的二氧化碳爆破环境影响分析[J].矿冶工程,42(3):36-40.
|
|
袁嘉声,畅永锋,郑春龙,等,2021.氰化尾渣脱氰技术综述[J].中国有色金属学报,31(6):1568-1581.
|
|
殷璐,金哲男,杨洪英,等,2018.我国黄金资源综合利用现状与展望[J].黄金科学技术,26(1):17-24.
|
|
中华人民共和国生态环境部,2020. 一般工业固体废物贮存和填埋污染控制标准:GB 18599-2020 [S].北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部.
|
|
中华人民共和国环境保护部,2018. 黄金行业氰渣污染控制技术规范:HJ 943-2018 [S].北京:中华人民共和国环境保护部.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |