[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Ore-bearing Pegmatites in the Wulan Chakabeishan Area
Received date: 2021-11-26
Revised date: 2022-10-18
Online published: 2023-01-06
Rare,scattered and rare earth non-ferrous metals is new strategic key mineral resources.At present,some research understandings and breakthroughs have been made in the mineralization and prospecting of key metal deposits in China.Pegmatite type deposit is one of the main sources of rare metal mineral resources,and the rare metal deposits is the most typical of pegmatite types in western China.The magmatic activities are very frequent,and the magmatic rocks are widely distributed,mainly medium-acidic rocks,and very few basite and ultrabasic rock in the Wulan Chakabeishan area of the northern margin of the Qaidam Basin.The main types of rocks with good conditions for forming rare metal deposits,which include syenite granite,monzonitic granite,granodiorite,quartz diorite,tonalite,diorite,gabbro,etc.In order to further understand the geochemical characteristics of the ore-bearing pegmatites in the research area and deepen the understanding of regional tectonic evolution,the mineralization of rare metals and the ore-controlling conditions,the ore-bearing pegmatite was taken as the research object,and the rock mineral features,main trace and rare earth elements composition were analyzed.In the study area,pegmatite vein was band-distributed,outputed in clusters,various types,morphological pulse,beads,lens,and under obvious structural control.The types of pegmatite that closely related to the mineralization of rare metals include mainly muscovite-biotite granite,syenite granite pegmatite,monzonitic granite pegmatite,quartz diorite pegmatite and granodiorite pegmatite.The study found that the ore-bearing pegmatites have high total alkali content,which is similar to the diagenesis characteristics formed in the continental arc or plate collision environment.The partition curve of rare earth is right-leaning,and the light and heavy rare earth fractionation is obvious,and the Eu with medium negative anomaly,it is speculated that the ore-bearing pegmatite source area is not only related to the crust,but also has the possibility of mantle source mafic magma was participated.The results show that the pegmatites were classified and named by the total alkalisili-con (TAS) classification map of the igneous rock system,the samples all fall in the granite-quartz monzonite-syenite area,which belongs to the sub-alkaline rock,and ore-bearing pegmatites have the characteristics of high silicon and overaluminum,and the pegmatites may have experienced the crystallization and separation of mica and feldspar.In this research region,the light rare earth elements is enriched,the heavy rare earth elements is lossed and the fractionation degree is high about ore-bearing pegmatite,it reflects that the mantle source material may be involved in the mineralization of rare metals and rare earth in the magma evolution and diagenetic process of pegmatite.The mineralization is more likely about Rb,Th,Cs,Ce and other rare metal,Ba,Zr,Hf,Nb,Ta,Li and other rare metals have potential for mineralization,and Sr,Y and other rare metals mineralization is little possibility.It is considered that the material source of pegmatites is related to the crust and the participation of mantle source material,and it is inferred that the geological tectonic environment of ore-bearing pegmatites may be post-collision or post-collision extension.The results of the research can provide a theoretical basis for the prospecting of pegmatite type rare metal deposits in the later stage.
Jianguo WANG , Shizhen ZHANG , Jia XING , Zhinan WANG , Shengyun WEI , Jian HU . Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Ore-bearing Pegmatites in the Wulan Chakabeishan Area[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2022 , 30(6) : 809 -821 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2022.06.178
废弃矿山修复示范工程纳入国家财政预算
2022年11月,财政部提前下达了两批2023年重点生态保护修复治理资金预算,共计119亿元,主要用于山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程、历史遗留废弃矿山生态修复示范工程等。
第一批下达给江苏、浙江、安徽、山东、河南、湖北、湖南、广东、广西、重庆、四川、云南、西藏、陕西、甘肃和新疆等16个省(自治区、直辖市)财政厅(局),分别下达预算2亿元至8.5亿元不等,合计108亿元,工程奖补总额310亿元。用于支持开展“十四五”第一批、第二批山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程以及西藏山南雅江流域山水林田湖草生态保护修复工程。
第二批下达给河北、辽宁、江苏、福建、江西、山东、湖南、四川、贵州、西藏和宁夏财政厅,合计11亿元,工程奖补总额33亿元。用于支持开展纳入中央财政支持范围的历史遗留废弃矿山生态修复示范工程。
根据2021年11月财政部修订的《重点生态保护修复治理资金管理办法》(以下简称《管理办法》),重点生态保护修复治理资金是用于支持开展山水林田湖草沙冰一体化保护和修复工程和历史遗留废弃工矿土地整治的,应优先用于解决生态系统突出问题。不得用于:不符合自然保护地、生态保护红线、耕地保护红线等国家管控要求的项目;有明确修复责任主体的项目;已有中央财政资金支持的项目;公园、广场、雕塑等旅游设施与“盆景”工程等景观工程建设。
对于支持范围内的生态修复项目工程,《管理办法》也明确制定了相关奖补措施。其中,用于山水林田湖草沙冰一体化保护和修复工程的奖补资金采取项目法分配,工程总投资10亿~20亿元的项目奖补5亿元;工程总投资20亿~50亿元的项目奖补10亿元;工程总投资50亿元以上的项目奖补20亿元。
用于历史遗留废弃工矿土地整治的奖补资金采取项目法或因素法分配。采取项目法分配的,工程总投资5亿元以上的项目奖补3亿元。采取因素法分配的,各省、自治区、直辖市奖补资金根据各省历史遗留废弃工矿土地损毁面积等因素确定,同时考虑各省财政困难程度,并根据资金使用绩效等对测算结果进行调整,体现结果导向。
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2022/1005-2518/1005-2518-2022-30-6-809.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
白洪阳,王核,闫庆贺,等,2022.新疆西昆仑雪凤岭锂矿床铌钽铁矿、锡石年龄及其地质意义[J].岩石学报,38(8):2139-2152.
|
|
陈金,2011.青海省乌兰县生格地区中—酸性侵入岩岩石地球化学特征及其构造意义[D].西安:长安大学.
|
|
陈西京,1976.深处岩浆分异与某地花岗伟晶岩的形成[J].地球化学,(3):213-229.
|
|
陈佑纬,毕献武,胡瑞忠,等,2009.贵东复式岩体印支期产铀和非产铀花岗岩地球化学特征对比研究[J].矿物岩石,29(3):106-114.
|
|
邓晋福,肖庆辉,苏尚国,等,2007.火成岩组合与构造环境:讨论[J].高校地质学报,13(3):392-402.
|
|
冯京,贾红旭,徐仕琪,等,2021.西昆仑大红柳滩矿集区伟晶岩型锂铍矿床找矿模型及意义[J].新疆地质,39(3):410-417.
|
|
傅成铭,权志高,周伟,2011.青海查查香卡矿床铀、稀土元素矿化特征及成矿潜力分析[J].铀矿地质,27(2):103-107.
|
|
胡晓君,李欢,2021.花岗伟晶岩型锂矿床研究进展及展望[J].中国有色金属学报,31(11):3468-3488.
|
|
姜春发,2002.中央造山带几个重要地质问题及其研究进展[J].地质通报,21(增2):453-355.
|
|
李建康,王登红,张德会,等,2006.川西甲基卡伟晶岩型矿床中含硅酸盐子矿物包裹体的发现及其意义[J].矿床地质,25(增):131-134.
|
|
李善平,薛万文,任华,等,2018.青海省“三稀”矿产资源现状及成矿规律[J].青海科技,25(6):10-15.
|
|
李善平,湛守智,金婷婷,等,2016.青海沙柳泉铌钽矿床伟晶岩稀土元素地球化学特征及物源分析[J].稀土,37(1):39-46.
|
|
李胜虎,李建康,张德会,2015.热液金刚石压腔在流体包裹体研究中的应用——以川西甲基卡伟晶岩型矿床为例[J].地质学报,89(4):747-754.
|
|
李贤芳,田世洪,王登红,等,2020.川西甲基卡锂矿床花岗岩与伟晶岩成因关系:U-Pb定年、Hf-O同位素和地球化学证据[J].矿床地质,39(2):273-304.
|
|
梁飞,2018.我国铍资源特征、供需预测与发展探讨[D].北京:中国地质科学院.
|
|
毛景文,袁顺达,谢桂青,等,2019.21世纪以来中国关键金属矿产找矿勘查与研究新进展[J].矿床地质,38(5):935-969.
|
|
潘彤,李善平,任华,等,2020.柴达木盆地北缘锂多金属矿成矿条件及找矿潜力[J].矿产勘查,11(6):1101-1116.
|
|
王秉璋,韩杰,谢祥镭,等,2020.青藏高原东北缘茶卡北山印支期(含绿柱石)锂辉石伟晶岩脉群的发现及Li-Be成矿意义[J].大地构造与成矿学,44(1):69-79.
|
|
王德滋,周金城,1999.我国花岗岩研究的回顾与展望[J].岩石学报,15(2):161-169.
|
|
王核,李沛,马华东,等,2017.新疆和田县白龙山超大型伟晶岩型锂铷多金属矿床的发现及其意义[J].大地构造与成矿学,41(6):1053-1062.
|
|
王中刚,于学元,赵振华,1989.稀土元素地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社.
|
|
汪晓伟,徐学义,马中平,等,2015.博格达造山带东段芨芨台子地区晚石炭世双峰式火山岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].中国地质,42(3):553-569.
|
|
吴才来,雷敏,吴迪,等,2016.柴北缘乌兰地区花岗岩锆石SHRIMP定年及其成因[J].地球学报,37(4):493-516.
|
|
徐新文,2009.青海省铌钽矿类型、特征及找矿方向[J].西部探矿工程,37(3):144-147.
|
|
闫亭廷,2011.柴北缘沙柳泉地区侵入岩地球化学特征及构造环境研究[D].西安:长安大学.
|
|
殷鸿福,张克信,1997.东昆仑造山带的一些特点[J].地球科学,22(4):339-342.
|
|
俞军真,2021.青海柴北缘西段赛什腾山—锡铁山古生代金成矿作用[D].武汉:中国地质大学.
|
|
袁忠信,白鸽,2001.中国内生稀有稀土矿床的时空分布[J].矿床地质,20(4):347-354.
|
|
张永明,2017.青海南山构造带印支期构造岩浆作用与区域构造演化[D].西安:长安大学.
|
|
钟军,陈擎,范洪海,等,2018.柴北缘查查香卡铀—钍—铌—稀土矿床地质特征及矿床成因:一种与钠长岩相关的新矿化类型[J].地学前缘,25(5):222-236.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |