[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Rock Mass Quality Evaluation Model Based on Improved Transfer Learning Algorithm
Received date: 2021-07-07
Revised date: 2021-09-21
Online published: 2022-03-07
Rock mass quality classification is an important foundation for engineering design and construction, and it is also an important research topic at present. Taking into account the complexity and uncertainty of rock masses and the differences of rock masses in different regions, machine learning methods are widely used in rock mass quality evaluation. A case database was established by collecting 55 sets of measured samples and 17 sets of interpolated samples from different regions. RQD, uniaxial saturated compressive strength (Rw), rock mass integrity coefficient (Kv), structural plane strength coefficient (Kf), groundwater seepage volume (ω) are determined as the input conditions of the model, and the rock mass quality grade is the output condition. Based on the case library, an improved two-stage regression migration learning (Two-stage TrAdaBoost.R2)-Isolated Forest multi-factor rock mass quality grade prediction model is proposed. The advantages of this model are of follows: (1) The idea of migration learning is introduced into the rock mass quality classification. Taking into account the differences of rock masses in different regions, using the idea of weight adjustment, a sample similar to the target rock mass is selected from the known samples to assist in the training of the model. Solved the problem of insufficient training samples, and achieve high-precision prediction of the model when there are fewer learning samples in the target field. (2) When using the migration algorithm to classify the quality of the rock mass, the classification problem is transformed into a regression problem. The regression algorithm is used to predict the quality of the rock mass. Only one model can be used to judge the multiple levels of the sample, which overcomes the limitation of the classification algorithm in solving the multi-classification problem. (3) The sample weight is adjusted in two stages, which solves the problem of the source domain weight falling too fast in the TrAdaBoost algorithm. (4) Combined the Two-stage TrAdaBoost.R2 algorithm with the Isolated Forest anomaly detection algorithm,the influence of abnormal data on the model is eliminated, and the stability of the model is increased. The trained model was used to make multiple judgments on 12 samples of the first phase underground project of Guangzhou Pumped Storage Power Station, and the prediction accuracy of the model was evaluated by the mean square error. The average mean square error of the test sample is 0.067, and the prediction accuracy is high. It proves that the model has good performance in the application of rock mass quality grade prediction.
Jianhua HU , Mengmeng GUO , Tan ZHOU , Tao ZHANG . Rock Mass Quality Evaluation Model Based on Improved Transfer Learning Algorithm[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021 , 29(6) : 826 -833 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2021.06.089
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2021/1005-2518/1005-2518-2021-29-6-826.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China,2014. Standard for engineering classification of rock masses:GB/T 50218—2014 [S].Beijing:China Planning Press.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
蔡广奎,2001.围岩稳定性分类的BP网络模型研究[D].南京:河海大学.
|
陈星,2018.模糊模式识别法及LVQ神经网络在岩体质量分级中的应用研究[J].人民珠江,39(10):1-6.
|
宫凤强,李夕兵,2007.距离判别分析法在岩体质量等级分类中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,26(1):190-194.
|
何云松,薛秋池,赵其华,2017.基于改进向量机的岩体质量分级研究[J].水利水电技术,48(1):133-138.
|
胡建华,尚俊龙,雷涛,2012.基于RS-TOPSIS法的地下工程岩体质量评价[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),43(11):4412-4419.
|
刘万军,李天慧,曲海成,2018.基于Fisher准则和TrAdaboost的高光谱相似样本分类算法[J].国土资源遥感,30(4):41-48.
|
文畅平,2008.基于属性数学理论的岩体质量分级方法[J].水力发电学报,27(3):75-80.
|
徐桂芝,林放,宫铭鸿,等,2019.基于TrAdaBoost的跨脑辨识P300电位研究[J].生物医学工程学杂志,36(4):531-540.
|
杨朝晖,刘浩吾,1999.地下工程围岩稳定性分类的人工神经网络模型[J].四川联合大学学报(工程科学版),(4):66-72.
|
姚银佩,李夕兵,宫凤强,等,2010.加权距离判别分析法在岩体质量等级分类中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,29(增2):4119-4123.
|
原国红,陈剑平,马琳,2005.可拓评判方法在岩体质量分类中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,(9):1539-1544.
|
张彪,戴兴国,2017.基于有限区间云模型和距离判别赋权的岩体质量分类模型[J].水文地质工程地质,44(5):150-157.
|
中华人民共和国水利部,2014. 工程岩体分级标准:GB/T 50218—2014 [S].北京:中国计划出版社.
|
周述达,裴启涛,丁秀丽,2016.改进分类区分度及权重的岩体质量评价灰评估模型及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,35(增2):3671-3679.
|
周坦,胡建华,匡也,2019.基于模糊RES-多维云模型的岩体质量评判方法与应用[J].中国有色金属学报,29(8):1771-1780.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |