[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Risk Recognition of Metal Mine Goaf Based on Relative Difference Function
Received date: 2020-08-05
Revised date: 2020-11-02
Online published: 2021-07-14
Numerous of underground goaf left by metal mine mining not only bring a series of safety and environmental problems to the society,but also affect the development of mineral resources and the healthy and sustainable development of the national economy.The risk recognition of metal mine underground goaf is an important basis of its treatment,so accurately identify the danger of the goaf has become one of the problems to be solved urgently in the safety supervision of government departments and the safety production of mining enterprises.It has been difficult to accurately recognize metal mine underground goaf risk for many factors will influence the stability of underground goaf,and coexistence of quantitative and qualitative factors,and the existence of contradictions between these factors.In order to accurately identify the risk of metal mines underground goaf and manage the goaf economically and rationally,a risk recognition model of metal mine underground goaf based on relative difference function was established.First,a risk recognition index system of metal mine underground goaf containing 14 indexes was constructed according to the risk factors such as hydrogeological factors,goaf parameters,and other factors.Then the relative membership degree of the indexes to evaluation levels was calculated by relative difference function,and the combined weight of the indexes was determined by entropy weight method and analytical hierarchy process.Afterwards,the comprehensive relative membership degree and level characteristic value of metal mine underground goaf risk to different evaluation levels was calculated under four different combinations of distance parameter and optimization criteria parameter,and the level of metal mine underground goaf risk was then to be determined by the average level characteristic value.Furthermore,the whole process was applied to the risk recognition of eight underground goafs a tin mine and their calculated risk level was grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅰ,grade Ⅲ,grade Ⅰ,grade Ⅲ,grade Ⅰ,grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅰ,respectively.The calculation results fully consistent with the recognition results of uncertainty measurement and also well accordant with the practical situation,it also provides a helpful theoretical basis for the mine’s further treatment of underground goaf and safety production.The results show that the above established risk recognition model can self-verify the recognition results by changing its four combinations of its own parameters (distance parameter and optimization criteria parameter),which reflects the model’s overall control over the essential law of the unity and opposites of evaluation indexes.The model can improve the recognized reliability of underground goaf risk and its identification process is simple and efficient,which provides a new method for underground goaf risk recognition.
Baoquan LIAO , Yuxian KE , Chen QING , Huaxi ZHANG , Haoqi HUANG , Lifa FANG , Cheng WANG , Tiejun TAO . Risk Recognition of Metal Mine Goaf Based on Relative Difference Function[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021 , 29(3) : 440 -448 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2021.03.144
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2021/1005-2518/1005-2518-2021-29-3-440.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
陈国芳,于兆绚,周盼,2015.改进物元可拓模型在采空区安全性评价中的应用[J].有色金属科学与工程,6(4):91-96.
|
|
陈守煜,2009.可变模糊集理论与模型及其应用[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社.
|
|
陈朝辉,2018.基于相对差异函数的砌石隧道安全性评价[J].华东交通大学学报,35(4):8-14.
|
|
程秋亭,邓飞,陈艳红,等,2015.采空区稳定性数值模拟分析[J].有色金属科学与工程,6(2):85-88.
|
|
邓高,杨珊,2017.基于组合预测与变精度粗糙模糊集的采空区稳定性评价[J].黄金科学技术,25(3):98-107.
|
|
杜坤,李夕兵,刘科伟,等,2011.采空区危险性评价的综合方法及工程应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),42(9):2802-2811.
|
|
付玉华,肖国喜,2012.采空区塌陷预测的多元识别模型[J].有色金属科学与工程,3(6):61-64.
|
|
耿宏波,叶义成,2018.基于突变级数法的采空区危险性评价研究[J].化工矿物与加工,47(12):26-32.
|
|
宫凤强,李夕兵,董陇军,等,2008.基于未确知测度理论的采空区危险性评价研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,27(2):323-330.
|
|
胡洪旺,叶义成,耿宏波,等,2018.基于BP神经网络的层状矿床采空区稳定性评价研究[J].化工矿物与加工,47(3):60-63,69.
|
|
黄英华,闻磊,黄敏,等,2019.金属矿山复杂采空区稳定性模糊评价体系研究[J].矿业研究与开发,39(12):63-67.
|
|
马海涛,刘宁武,王云海,等,2014.金属矿山采空区灾害防治技术研究综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,10(10):75-80.
|
|
任红岗,谭卓英,王海军,2016.基于集对分析—灰色关联理论的采空区处理多属性方案综合评价[J].有色金属(矿山部分),68(2):15-20.
|
|
阮云凯,陈剑平,史明远,等,2016.基于相对差异函数和博弈论的泥石流敏感性分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),37(12):1800-1804.
|
|
王纪鹏,2017.基于主成分的采空区危险性关联因子聚类分析[J].化工矿物与加工,46(2):64-68.
|
|
王新民,柯愈贤,鄢德波,等,2012.基于熵权法和物元分析的采空区危险性评价研究[J].中国安全科学学报,22(6):71-78.
|
|
汪朝,郭进平,王李管,2015.采空区危险性的支持向量机识别[J].重庆大学学报,38(4):85-90,127.
|
|
温廷新,孙红娟,徐波,等,2015.矿区采空塌陷危险性预测的RS-SVM模型[J].中国安全科学学报,25(10):16-21.
|
|
尉强,2019.基于变权和相对差异函数的地铁运营安全管理评价[J].价值工程,38(3):37-39.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |