img

Wechat

  • CN 62-1112/TF 
  • ISSN 1005-2518 
  • Founded in 1988
Adv. Search
Mining Technology and Mine Management

Mine Safety Production Status Evaluation Based on Combination Weight and Matter Element Analysis

  • Yuxian KE ,
  • Cheng WANG ,
  • Lifa FANG ,
  • Baoquan LIAO
Expand
  • School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China

Received date: 2020-06-13

  Revised date: 2020-07-12

  Online published: 2021-01-29

Abstract

Mine safety is the foundation and premise of the sustainable development of mining industry.To do well in mine safety work is very important to ensure the development of regional economy and the safety of citizens’ personal and property.With the increase of mining scale and mining depth of mineral resources,the situation of mine safety production is becoming more and more complex,and various kinds of safety accidents happen frequently,which brings inestimable consequences to the country and the people.Therefore,in order to evaluate the situation of mine safety production accurately,reduce the accidents of mine safety production and ensure the sustainable development of the mine,the evaluation model of mine safety production status (MSPS) based on combination weight and matter element analysis was established.Firstly,according to the influencing factors of mine safety production,an evaluation index system of MSPS was constructed,which takes safety management,safety technology,safety production education and training and safety environment as the standard level,containing 12 evaluation indexes such as safety production management organization and safety management system as the index level.Industry experts scored each evaluation index,and we summarized and normalized the scoring results.Then the matter-element transformation was used to determine the classical domain,nodal domain and the matter-element of evaluated mine matter-element.The correlation degrees between the evaluation indexes and the established safety levels were calculated step by step,and the concept of distance function was introduced into the combination of analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method for weighting to accurately determine the combination weight of mine safety production evaluation index.Finally,the grade of MSPS can be obtained from the comprehensive correlation degree between evaluation indexes and established safety levels.After calculation,the safety grades of five mines under a mining group are respectively grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅲ,grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅰ and grade Ⅱ.The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to verity the results,and the two evaluation results are consistent.The research results show that the weight of evaluation indexes calculated by combination weighting method are more scientific and reasonable because it can avoid absolute subjectivity and objectivity.In addition,the evaluation model of mine safety production based on the combination weight and matter-element analysis provides an effective technical way for the study of mine safety production,which is helpful for the formulation and completion of the best mine safety production management plan.It is of great guiding significance to improve the safety production guarantee system of mines.

Cite this article

Yuxian KE , Cheng WANG , Lifa FANG , Baoquan LIAO . Mine Safety Production Status Evaluation Based on Combination Weight and Matter Element Analysis[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020 , 28(6) : 910 -919 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.06.108

References

1 Zhou J H,Wang L J.Comprehensive study on ecological restoration and land exploitation of mining subsidence in suburbs of Chinese mining cities[J].International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2014,1 (2):248-252.
2 王成,孙宝生,张建,等.中国矿山安全现状与对策[J]. 矿业研究与开发,2006,26(2):81-82,85.
2 Wang Cheng,Sun Baosheng,Zhang Jian,et al.On the current situation and counter measures of mine safety in China [J].Mining Research and Development,2006,26(2):81-82,85.
3 柯愈贤,王新民,张钦礼.全尾砂料浆磁化絮凝沉降特性[J]. 中国有色金属学报,2017,27(2):392-398.
3 Ke Yuxian,Wang Xinmin,Zhang Qinli. Flocculating sedimentation characteristic of pre-magnetized crude tailings slurry[J].The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals,2017,27(2):392-398.
4 柯愈贤,王新民,张钦礼,等. 基于全尾砂充填体非线性本构模型的深井充填强度指标[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2017,38(2):280-283.
4 Ke Yuxian,Wang Xinmin,Zhang Qinli,et al.Strength determination of crude tailings backfill in deep mine based on non-linear constitutive model[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science),2017,38(2):280-283.
5 Cygankiewicz J,Knechtel J. Isotherm maps of virgin rock temperature in collieries of katowicki holding w?glowy[J]. Journal of Sustainable Mining,2014,13(4):1-4.
6 陈建宏,覃曹原,邓东升.基于AHP和物元TOPSIS法的层状岩体巷道冒顶风险评价[J].黄金科学技术,2017,25(1):55-60.
6 Chen Jianhong,Qin Caoyuan,Deng Dongsheng. Risk assessment of bedded rock roadway roof fall based on AHP and Matter-Element TOPSIS method[J].Gold Science and Technology,2017,25(1):55-60.
7 王鸿鹏,徐桂芹,李娜,等. 基于熵权法TOPSIS模型对18省市安全生产状况评价研究[J]. 中国公共安全(学术版),2016(4):35-38.
7 Wang Hongpeng,Xu Guiqin,Li Na,et al.Evaluation on the safety production status of eighteen province and cities based on entropy weight TOPSIS model[J].China Public Security (Academy Edition),2016(4):35-38
8 吴凯,褚召祥. 基于B/S模式的矿山安全现状评价研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学术,2011,7(1):102-106.
8 Wu Kai,Chu Zhaoxiang. Research on present status assessment of mine safety based on B/S model [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(1):102-106.
9 唐琦. 基于PP模型的矿山企业安全生产状况研究[J]. 采矿技术,2019,19(2):44-45,49.
9 Tang Qi. Study on the safety production status of mining enterprises based on PP model[J].Mining Technology,2019,19 (2):44-45,49.
10 赵志国.基于突变理论的煤矿安全状态评价研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2019,46(4):113-117,122.
10 Zhao Zhiguo.Study on safety state evaluation of coal mine based on catastrophe theory [J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2019,46 (4):113-117,122.
11 尹土兵,王品,张鸣鲁. 基于AHP及模糊综合评判的地下金属矿山安全分析与评价[J]. 黄金科学技术,2015,23(3):60-66.
11 Yin Tubing,Wang Pin,Zhang Minglu.Analysis and evaluation of safety in underground metal mine based on AHP and fuzzy evaluation method[J].Gold Science and Technology,2015,23(3):60-66.
12 王新民,柯愈贤,鄢德波,等.基于熵权法和物元分析的采空区危险性评价研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(6):71-78.
12 Wang Xinmin,Ke Yuxian,Yan Debo,et al.Underground goaf risk evaluation based on entropy weight and matter element analysis[J].China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(6):71-78.
13 谢尊贤,李艳艳,吴晓茹,等. 基于物元多级可拓模型的档案馆火灾安全风险评价[J]. 安全与环境学报,2019,19(1):21-28.
13 Xie Zunxian,Li Yanyan,Wu Xiaoru,et al. Fire risk assessment of archives based on matter-element multi-level extension model [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2019,19(1):21-28.
14 陈道贵. 基于物元分析和组合权重的原地浸矿技术适用性评价模型[J].稀土,2019,40(4):32-39.
14 Chen Daogui.Applicability evaluation model of in-situ leaching technology based on matter-element analysis and combined weight[J].Chinese Rare Earths,2019,40(4):32-39.
15 郭其林,史秀志,唐礼忠.基于组合权重的地下矿山岩体质量可拓评价方法[J].矿冶工程,2013,33(3):34-38.
15 Guo Qilin,Shi Xiuzhi,Tang Lizhong. Extension evaluation method for rock mass quality in underground mine based on combination weighting [J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering,2013,33(3):34-38.
16 邓书显,张学凌,饶明贵. 基于Fuzzy逻辑和物元分析的矿井突水预测研究[J]. 江西理工大学学报,2009,30(4):1-3.
16 Deng Shuxian,Zhang Xueling,Rao Minggui.Research on the mine water inrush forecast based on fuzzy logic and matter element analysis [J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,2009,30(4):1-3.
17 万孝衡,王新民,朱阳亚,等.基于组合赋权TOPSIS法的采场结构参数优选[J].黄金科学技术,2014,22 (5):69-73.
17 Wan Xiaoheng,Wang Xinmin,Zhu Yangya,et al.Optimization of the stope structural parameters based on empowerment combination TOPSIS[J]. Gold Science and Technology,2014,22 (5):69-73.
18 梁礼明,吴莉,谢荣浩. 基于层次分析法的工程评标应用研究[J]. 江西理工大学学报,2006,27(1):61-63.
18 Liang Liming,Wu Li,Xie Ronghao. Research on application of analytic hierarchy process in engineering project assessment[J].Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,2006,27(1):61-63.
19 虞未江,贾超,狄胜同,等. 基于综合权重和改进物元可拓评价模型的地下水水质评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(2):539-547.
19 Yu Weijiang,Jia Chao,Di Shengtong,et al. Groundwater quality evaluation based on comprehensive weight and improved matter-element extension evaluation model[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2019,49(2):539-547.
20 范敏,刘亚玲,黄华勇,等. 一种配电自动化系统状态操作评价方法[J]. 重庆大学学报,2018,41(3):21-31.
20 Fan Min,Liu Yaling,Huang Huayong,et al. An evaluation method for state operation of distribution automation system[J].Journal of Chongqing University,2018,41(3):21-31.
21 李希建,华攸金,陈刘瑜. 基于熵权物元可拓模型的煤矿安全评价及其应用[J]. 矿业研究与开发,2019,39(9):93-99.
21 Li Xijian,Hua Youjin,Chen Liuyu. Coal mine safety evaluation based on entropy weight matter element extension model and its application[J].Mining Research and Development,2019,39(9):93-99.
22 迟国泰,李刚,程砚秋. 基于AHP-标准离差的人的全面发展评价模型及其实证研究[J]. 管理学报,2010,7(2):301-310.
22 Chi Guotai,Li Gang,Cheng Yanqiu. An evaluation model of human’s overall development based on AHP standard deviation and its empirical study [J]. Chinese Journal of Management,2010,7(2):301-310.
Outlines

/