[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Research on Safety Evaluation of Tailings Pond Based on Entropy Method-Catastrophe Theory
Received date: 2019-12-10
Revised date: 2020-03-22
Online published: 2020-07-01
Tailings pond is a man-made source of dangerous debris flow with high potential energy,which threatens the safety of downstream residents and facilities.In recent years,tailings pond accidents have occurred frequently,causing extremely casualties, environmental pollution and bad social impact.In order to reduce the occurrence of accidents,the actual safety of the tailings pond must be scientifically evaluated.Aiming at the problems that complex causes of tailings dam accidents,many influencing factors of safety conditions,and difficulty in determining the proportion of each evaluation index in the whole system,this paper proposes a tailings dam safety evaluation method combining entropy method and catastrophe theory.Based on the “Four Factors”(people,things,management,environment) theory of safety management in system engineering,the safety status of the tailing pond is affected from the aspects of personnel status(A),the status of tailing pond itself (B),safety management(C) and environmental impact factors (D)were decomposed,and an index system of 3 layers and 11 underlying indicators was established.When in use,firstly,entropy method is used to sort the importance of evaluation indexes,and then catastrophe theory is used to calculate to obtain the catastrophe grade value of tailing pond,and finally the comprehensive safety grade of tailing pond is obtained.The method was applied to a engineering project,and the case studies show that the relative importance ranking results of the underlying indicators are:{A2,A3,A1},{B1,B3,B2},{C3,C1,C2},{D1,D2}.The relative importance ranking results of the middle indicators are:{B,C,A,D}.Then use the normal formula to calculate the total mutation level value is 0.9641,the mutation membership function value is 0.86,means the security level belongs to a safer level.This result is consistent with the results obtained by the expert group,and is in line with the basic situation of the tailings pond.The safety evaluation method based on entropy method-catastrophe theory can be adapted to the safety evaluation of tailings pond.
Zhenxing GAO , Jinping GUO . Research on Safety Evaluation of Tailings Pond Based on Entropy Method-Catastrophe Theory[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020 , 28(3) : 450 -456 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.03.197
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2020/1005-2518/1005-2518-2020-28-3-450.shtml
| 1 |
中华人民共和国应急管理部.《国家安全监管总局关于开展非煤矿山安全生产专项整治工作的通知》解读[EB/OL].2017-06-01)[2019-11-15].
|
| 2 |
高振兴.基于强度折减法的尾矿坝稳定性数值分析[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2011.
|
| 3 |
何锦龙,伍跃胜,刘泽东,等.不同降雨量对尾矿坝稳定性的影响规律分析[J].金属矿山,2015,44(8):150-153.
|
| 4 |
穆贵清,吕淑然,王冀飞.尾矿坝外排土压坡对尾矿坝稳定性影响研究[J].金属矿山,2013,42(12):108-110,122.
|
| 5 |
郝喆.尾矿库工程场地的地震安全性评价[J].金属矿山,2018,47(8):153-158.
|
| 6 |
吴佳华.爆破振动对尾矿坝稳定性的影响[D].赣州:江西理工大学,2018.
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
郑欣,许开立.尾矿坝溃坝后果严重度评价模型研究[J].工业安全与环保,2009,35(5):30-31.
|
| 9 |
王耀宇,佘成学,陈昱钦,等.尾矿库排洪系统竖井深度对泄流能力的影响研究[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2017,15(6):133-137.
|
| 10 |
陈雯.斜槽盖板形式对尾矿库排洪系统泄流能力的影响[J].金属矿山,2018,47(1):47-52.
|
| 11 |
韩艳杰,张志军,李亚俊.模糊综合评判模型在尾矿库安全检查评价中的应用[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2014,66(1) :62-66.
|
| 12 |
罗飞飞,李庆军.基于灰色模糊理论的尾矿库安全评价方法研究[J].工业安全与环保,2009,35(8) :46-48.
|
| 13 |
郭进平,王雪妮,程平.基于不确定语言信息的尾矿库安全综合评价方法[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2011,30(2):216-220.
|
| 14 |
王英博,王琳,李仲学.基于HS-BP算法的尾矿库安全评价[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(11):2585-2590.
|
| 15 |
郭显光.熵值法及其在综合评价中的应用[J].财贸研究,1994(6):56-60.
|
| 16 |
凌复华.突变理论及其应用[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1987.
|
| 17 |
聂兴信,张国丹.基于熵值法—突变理论的地下矿山紧急避险系统可靠性研究[J].黄金科学技术,2016,24(6):72-77.
|
| 18 |
周荣义,黎忠文,牛会永.基于突变理论的油库火灾爆炸分析与模糊动态评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(6):97-101.
|
| 19 |
郑锐,杨振宏,潘成林.基于熵技术的尾矿库安全模糊综合评价体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):107-111.
|
| 20 |
马敏.尾矿库安全评价指标体系及安全评价信息管理系统[D].青岛:山东科技大学,2008.
|
| 21 |
高振兴,赵江平,郭进平,等.基于突变理论的尾矿库安全评价[J].金属矿山,2009,39(12):121-125.
|
| 22 |
吴中如,朱伯芳.三峡水工建筑物安全监控与反馈设计[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |