[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Comparative Study of Stress Relief Method and Acoustic Emission Method in In-situ Stress Measurement in Deep Area of Xincheng Gold Mine
Received date: 2019-09-17
Revised date: 2020-03-06
Online published: 2020-07-01
As the mining depth increases,the ground stress gradually increases,and rock burst phenomenon is likely to occur,which brings great damage to underground roadways and stope.Accurate ground stress magnitude and direction has good reference guidance value to underground engineering and can effectively avoid the occurrence of damage such as rock burst.In order to obtain the accurate ground stress distribution in the deep mining area of Xincheng gold mine,the stress relief method and acoustic emission method were used to measure the in-situ stress of the -830~-1 150 m deep mining area.The specific method of geostress measurement and the solution process of geostress measurement results were expounded.Subsequently,six measurement points of -830 m,-930 m and -1 030 m were measured using the stress relaxation method,and three measuring points in the three levels of -950 m,-1 050 m and -1 150 m were measured by AE method.Among them,the directional disturbance least squares multiple regression was used to improve the accuracy of the six stress components of the hole stress relief method,and the coordinates of the strain gauge were transformed into a space rectangular coordinate system by using the space coordinate transformation formula.The magnitude and direction of the ground stress were calculated by using the LUT-str three-dimensional geostress calculation program.The distribution law of the deep ground stress in the mining area under two different measurement modes was obtained,and the comparative analysis of the measurement results of the two methods were carried out.The results of the two measurement methods show that the horizontal principal stress and the vertical principal stress measured by the two measurement methods both increase linearly,the vertical principal stress is both close to the self-heavy stress of the overburden layer,and the deep stress of the Xincheng gold deposit is horizontal stress mainly,the maximum horizontal principal stress is NWW-SEE direction.The maximum horizontal principal stress measured by AE method is about 1.39 times of self-weight stress,and the stress relieving method is about 1.49 times.The maximum horizontal principal stress.vertical principal stress and horizontal minimum principal stress measured at -1 030 m level with errors of 12.1%,5.35%,and 13.46%,respectively,which have good consistency and provide good support for the exploitation and support design of deep mining areas.
Chunde MA , Zelin LIU , Weibin XIE , Xin’ao WEI , Xinhao ZHAO , Shan LONG . Comparative Study of Stress Relief Method and Acoustic Emission Method in In-situ Stress Measurement in Deep Area of Xincheng Gold Mine[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020 , 28(3) : 401 -410 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.03.157
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2020/1005-2518/1005-2518-2020-28-3-401.shtml
| 1 |
乔兰,张亦海,李远,等.深部花岗岩CSIRO地应力测量中高压双轴加卸载试验及非线弹性分析模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(1):40-48.
|
| 2 |
聂胜陆,曹洪征.那林金矿地应力与井巷稳固性的关系探讨[J].黄金科学技术,2010,18(6):65-69.
|
| 3 |
铁柱,朝宝楞,纪主.图古日格金矿地应力测量与分析[J].黄金科学技术,2014,22(6):73-76.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
张东明,白鑫,齐消寒,等.含层理岩石的AE特征分析及基于Kaiser效应的地应力测试研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(1):87-97.
|
| 6 |
王成虎.地应力主要测试和估算方法回顾与展望[J].地质论评,2014,60(5):971-996.
|
| 7 |
蔡美峰.地应力测量原理和方法的评述[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1993,12(3):275-283.
|
| 8 |
尤明庆.水压致裂法测量地应力方法的研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(3):350-353.
|
| 9 |
乔兰,欧阳振华,来兴平,等.三山岛金矿采空区地应力测量及其结果分析[J].北京科技大学学报,2004,26(6):569-571.
|
| 10 |
姜永东,鲜学福,许江.岩石声发射Kaiser效应应用于地应力测试的研究[J].岩土力学,2005,26(6):946-950.
|
| 11 |
刘允芳.水压致裂法三维地应力测量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1991,10(3):246-256.
|
| 12 |
王建军.应用水压致裂法测量三维地应力的几个问题[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(2):229-233.
|
| 13 |
蔡美峰,乔兰,于波,等.金川二矿区深部地应力测量及其分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(4):46-50.
|
| 14 |
蔡美峰,刘卫东,李远.玲珑金矿深部地应力测量及矿区地应力场分布规律[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(2):227-233.
|
| 15 |
李利峰,邹正盛,张庆.声发射Kaiser效应在地应力测量中的应用现状[J].煤田地质与勘探,2011,39(1):41-45,51.
|
| 16 |
付小敏,王旭东.利用岩石声发射测试地应力数据处理方法的研究[J].实验室研究与探索,2007,26(11):282-285.
|
| 17 |
陈枫,饶秋华,徐纪成,等.应变解除法原理及其在大红山铁矿地应力测量中的应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,38(3):545-550.
|
| 18 |
杨曙光.超定方程组残量极小化的定向扰动最小二乘法[J].武汉大学学报(自然科学版),1990(3):17-25.
|
| 19 |
闫振雄,郭奇峰,王培涛.空心包体应变计地应力分量计算方法及应用[J].岩土力学,2018,39(2):715-721.
|
| 20 |
闫振雄,王培涛.空心包体应变计地应力计算方法的探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(增1):3568-3574.
|
| 21 |
陈颙.声发射技术在岩石力学研究中的应用[J].地球物理学报,1977,20(4):312-322.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |