[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Research on Classification Method of Surrounding Rock Stability Based on Comprehensive Decision Cloud Model
Received date: 2019-12-05
Revised date: 2020-03-12
Online published: 2020-07-01
The stability analysis of surrounding rock of underground engineering is related to the safety of underground engineering.The stability of surrounding rock directly determines the success or failure of the underground engineering.Therefore,it is of great significance to carry out the stability evaluation of surrounding rock of underground engineering.Based on cloud theory,the rock uniaxial saturation compressive strength,integrity coefficient,basic rock quality index,groundwater impact correction coefficient,and weak structure surface condition impact coefficient were selected as the surrounding rock stability classification indicators.The combination weight of the above index system was obtained by using DEMATEL decision-making model and entropy weight method,and then 20 sets of measured data of highway tunnel engineering were selected as learning samples to establish a comprehensive decision cloud model for surrounding rock stability classification.It is applied to an example of surrounding rock stability classification for 5 groups of Xiaohongshilazi jade mine.The results show that the discrimination result of the comprehensive decision cloud model is consistent with the actual situation,and the discrimination accuracy can reach 80%,which is better than the discrimination results of the K-nearest neighbor algorithm and the random forest algorithm,indicating that the comprehensive decision cloud model established in this paper has certain application value in engineering practice and can provide a new idea for stability classification of surrounding rocks.
Keping ZHOU , Xiaofeng HOU , Yun LIN . Research on Classification Method of Surrounding Rock Stability Based on Comprehensive Decision Cloud Model[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020 , 28(3) : 372 -379 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.03.194
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2020/1005-2518/1005-2518-2020-28-3-372.shtml
| 1 |
钱七虎.地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(10):1945-1956.
|
| 2 |
薛黎明,李长明,郑志学,等,基于FP-tree与云变换的围岩稳定性评价指标体系研究[J].铁道标准设计,2019,63(7):102-107.
|
| 3 |
何发亮,王石春.铁路隧道围岩分级方法研究及发展[J].铁道工程学报,2005(增1):392-397.
|
| 4 |
焦春茂,吕爱钟.粘弹性圆形巷道支护结构上的荷载及其围岩应力的解析解[J].岩土力学,2004(增1):103-106.
|
| 5 |
杜时贵,周庆良,孙有法.RQD在隧道围岩分类中的应用[J].公路,1996(10):21-24.
|
| 6 |
师伟,史彦文,韩常领,等.RMR围岩分级法与中国公路隧道围岩分级方法对比[J].中外公路,2009,29(4):383-386.
|
| 7 |
刘德峰,刘长武,陈宏臻.特大采空区围岩稳定性评价[C]//2015(第六届)中国矿业科技大会.北京:冶金工业出版社,2015.
|
| 8 |
贾超,肖树芳,刘宁.可拓学理论在洞室岩体质量评价中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(5):751-756.
|
| 9 |
盛继亮.地下工程围岩稳定性模糊综合评价模型研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增1):2418-2421.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
宫凤强,李夕兵,高科.地下工程围岩稳定性分类的突变级数法研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,39(5):1081-1086.
|
| 14 |
胡建华,尚俊龙,雷涛.基于RS-TOPSIS法的地下工程岩体质量评价[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(11):4412-4419.
|
| 15 |
蔡广奎.围岩稳定性分类的BP网络模型研究[D].南京:河海大学,2001.
|
| 16 |
赖永标,乔春生,刘开云,等.支持向量机在围岩稳定性分类中的应用[J].水利学报,2006(9):1092-1096.
|
| 17 |
李德毅,刘常昱,杜鹢,等.不确定性人工智能[J].软件学报,2004(11):1583-1594.
|
| 18 |
李志超,周科平,林允.基于RS-云模型的硫化矿石自燃倾向性综合评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(9):126-131.
|
| 19 |
史雪梅,李德毅,孟海军.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究与发展,1995(6):15-20.
|
| 20 |
雷武林,周华龙,姜思阳,等.正态云模型在煤巷围岩稳定性分类中的应用[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(5):194-197.
|
| 21 |
田玉刚,杜渊会,覃东华,等.基于数据场和云模型的洪水灾害风险等级评估[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(8):158-163.
|
| 22 |
陈昌彦,王贵荣.各类岩体质量评价方法的相关性探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(12):1894-1900.
|
| 23 |
牟瑞芳,蔡其杰.基于云模型及粗糙集理论的围岩稳定性分级方法研究[J].安全与环境学报,2018,18(4):1251-1257.
|
| 24 |
梁国利.潼荣高速公路曾家山隧道围岩分级及稳定性评价[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2017.
|
| 25 |
李科.基于熵权—云模型的隧道围岩分级方法研究[J].现代隧道技术,2018,55(4):69-75,86.
|
| 26 |
张和平,陈齐海.基于因子分析-DEMATEL定权法的期刊综合评价研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(11):180-185.
|
| 27 |
王清源,潘旭海.熵权法在重大危险源应急救援评估中的应用[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(3):87-92.
|
| 28 |
李刚,李建平,孙晓蕾,等.主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(12):17-26,61.
|
| 29 |
江勇顺.山区高速公路隧道围岩分级方法及应用研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |