[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Gold Science and Technology >

2019 , Vol. 27 >Issue 6: 920 - 930

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2019.06.920

Mining Technology and Mine Management

Construction and Evaluation of Generalized Safety Management Model for Underground Metal Mines

  • Zhuan DAI ,
  • Zhouquan LUO ,
  • Yaguang QIN ,
  • Lei WEN ,
  • Chunsheng DING ,
  • Zhezhe DONG
Expand
  • School of Resources and Safety Engineering，Central South University，Changsha 410083，Hunan，China

Received date: 2019-06-05

  Revised date: 2019-08-30

  Online published: 2019-12-24

Fold

Highlights

With the development of safety science，the scope of safety science research is not limited to accident prevention and risk control.The goal of safety management has gradually changed to the pursuit of coordinated operation of the whole system and the protection of people’s physical and mental well-being.And there are still frequent mine accidents and serious safety situation in China.In order to make the safety management of underground metal mines not only limited to accident prevention and hidden danger control，but also to make safety management better protect workers’ health and coordinate the operation of production system，combining with the generalized safety model，a safety management model of an underground metal mine was constructed，and the meanings and correlations of all levels of systems and elements in the model were described.In order to realize the information communication of all levels of systems in the generalized safety model，a method considering the fuzziness and uncertainty of evaluation data was proposed by using cloud model，AHP method and CRITIC method.It can also adjust the weight of each part by itself.Using cloud model to unify expert opinions and consider the fuzziness and uncertainty of evaluation data，AHP method to consider the subjective weight，CRITIC method to measure the objective weight and modify the subjective weight.The production system of an underground metal mine was divided into 12 microsystems，such as man-lifting system，etc.The weight of each microsystem was obtained after modification，and the safety assessment grade clouds of the mine and the microsystems were made.The results of evaluation examples show that the mine is in a safe state and the safety situation is stable，but it is necessary to make decision and deal with these problems，such as the low mean value of safety evaluation score of M2，M7 and M8 microsystems，the great fluctuation of safety score of M9 microsystems，and the low mean value and great fluctuation of safety score of M10 and M11 microsystems.Moreover，the weights of M2，M9，M10 and M12 microsystems after modification are relatively high，so we should pay attention to their safety management.The generalized safety model is no longer confined to accident prevention and risk control，aiming at ensuring the coordinated and efficient operation of the crowd and the machine group.It can better monitor the safety situation of the mine，protect the health of the workers and make the whole production system of the mine operate safely and efficiently.The evaluation method proposed in this paper is helpful to obtain the safety information of each system in the generalized safety model，and to obtain the evaluation results reflecting the fluctuation of mine safety situation considering the subjective and objective weights.

Cite this article

Zhuan DAI , Zhouquan LUO , Yaguang QIN , Lei WEN , Chunsheng DING , Zhezhe DONG . Construction and Evaluation of Generalized Safety Management Model for Underground Metal Mines[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2019 , 27(6) : 920 -930 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2019.06.920

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
1
中华人民共和国应急管理部.2017年全国非煤矿山生产安全事故统计分析报告[R].北京：中华人民共和国应急管理部，2018.

Ministry of Emergency Management of the People’s Republic of China.Statistical analysis report on production safety accidents in non-coal mines in 2017[R].Beijing：Ministry of Emergency Management of the People’s Republic of China，2018.

2
田水承，李红霞，王莉，等.从三类危险源理论看煤矿事故的频发[J].中国安全科学学报，2007，17（1）：10.

Tian Shuicheng， Li Hongxia， Wang Li，et al.Probe into the frequency of coal mine accidents based on the theory of three types of hazards[J].China Safety Science Journal，2007，17（1）：10.

3
傅贵，殷文韬，董继业，等.行为安全“2-4”模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用[J].煤炭学报，2013，38（7）：1123-1129.

Fu Gui， Yin Wentao， Dong Jiye，et al.Behavior-based accident causation：The “2-4”model and its safety implications in coal mines[J].Journal of China Coal Society，2013，38（7）：1123-1129.

4
Liu G Y， Luo C L.Analysis of the safety psychological factors in the coal mine safety management[J].Procedia Engineering，2012，45（2）：253-258.

5
Mustafa O， Seyhan O， Erhan A.Applying hierarchical loglinear models to nonfatal underground coal mine accidents for safety management[J].International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics，2014，20（2）：239-248.

6
Su T Y， Sun Z Q， Yang N.The analysis of coal mine safety management evaluation system based on the DEMATEL and ISM model[C]//2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.NewYork：IEEE，2011：12304233.

7
张舒，史秀志，古德生，等.基于ISM和AHP以及模糊评判的矿山安全管理能力分析与评价[J].中南大学学报（自然科学版），2011，42（8）：2406-2416.

Zhang Shu， Shi Xiuzhi， Gu Desheng，et al.Analysis and evaluation of safety management capability in mine based on ISM and AHP and fuzzy evaluation method[J].Journal of Central South University （Natural Science Edition），2011，42（8）：2406-2416.

8
王志，郭勇.基于BP神经网络的非煤地下矿山安全评价模型[J].中国安全科学学报，2009，19（2）：124.

Wang Zhi， Guo Yong.Safety assessment model of underground non-coal mine based on BP neural network[J].China Safety Science Journal，2009，19（2）：124.

9
Yin J， Wang Y J， Lü L，et al.Research of non-coal mine safety management system on the basis of GIS[J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology，2010，32（13）：110-113.

10
罗周全，程鹏毅.基于DEMATEL-ISM的地下金属矿山人机系统事故影响因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2017，13（12）：145-151.

Luo Zhouquan， Cheng Pengyi.Analysis on factors affecting accidents of man-machine system in underground metal mine based on DEMATEL-ISM[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2017，13（12）：145-151.

11
Hu L R， Li G Q.Evaluation of personnel underground behavior safety for metal mines based on grey relevance analysis[J].Applied Mechanics and Materials，2015，737（2）：461-466.

12
尹土兵，王品，张鸣鲁.基于AHP及模糊综合评判的地下金属矿山安全分析与评价[J].黄金科学技术，2015，23（3）：60-66.

Yin Tubing， Wang Pin， Zhang Minglu.Analysis and evaluation of safety in underground metal mine based on AHP and fuzzy evaluation method[J].Gold Science and Technology，2015，23（3）：60-66.

13
吴超，黄浪，贾楠，等.广义安全模型构建研究[J].科技管理研究，2018，38（1）：250-255.

Wu Chao， Huang Lang， Jia Nan，et al.Study on the construction of generalized safety model[J].Science and Technology Management Research，2018，38（1）：250-255.

14
刘辉，王海宁，吕志飞.模糊神经网络技术在矿山安全评价中的适应性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2005，1（3）：56-59.

Liu Hui， Wang Haining， Zhifei Lü.Study of adaptability on FNN in mine safety assessment[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2005，1（3）：56-59.

15
陆秋琴，潘长波，黄光球.基于未确知属性层次法的矿山资源环境安全评价模型[J].安全与环境学报，2013，13（1）：234-240.

Lu Qiuqin， Pan Changbo， Huang Guangqiu.A mining resource environment evaluation model based on the fuzzy attribute hierarchical analysis[J].Journal of Safety and Environment，2013，13（1）：234-240.

16
李德毅，杜鹅.不确定性人工智能[M].北京：国防工业出版社，2005.

Li Deyi， Du E.Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence[M].Beijing：National Defense Industry Press，2005.

17
叶琼，李绍稳，张友华，等.云模型及应用综述[J].计算机工程与设计，2011，32（12）：4198-4201.

Ye Qiong， Li Shaowen， Zhang Youhua，et al.Cloud model and application overview[J].Computer Engineering and Design，2011，32（12）：4198-4201.

18
李邵红，王少阳，朱建东，等.基于权重融合和云模型的岩爆倾向性预测研究[J].岩土工程学报，2018，40（6）：112-120.

Li Shaohong， Wang Shaoyang， Zhu Jiandong，et al.Prediction of rock burst tendency based on weighted fusion and improved cloud model [J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2018，40（6）：112-120.

19
刘禹，李德毅.正态云模型雾化性质统计分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报，2010，36（11）：1320-1324.

Liu Yu， Li Deyi.Statistics on atomized feature of normal cloud model[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，2010，36（11）：1320-1324.

20
彭洁.基于云模型的退役铀尾矿库渗水污染现状分析及水质综合评价[D].衡阳：南华大学，2016.

Peng Jie.Analysis on Current Situation of Pollution and Water Quality Comprehensive Assessment of Seepage of Decommissioning Uranium Tailings Impoundment Based on the Cloud Model[D].Hengyang：University of South China，2016.

21
Saaty T L.How to make a decision：The analytic hierarchy process[J].European Journal of Operational Research，1994，24（6）：19-43.

22
Diakoulaki D， Mavrotas G， Papayannakis L.Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems：The critic method[J].Computers and Operations Research，1995，22（7）：763-770.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]