[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Study on Environmental Risk Evaluation of Overseas Mining Investment
Received date: 2018-04-29
Revised date: 2018-08-18
Online published: 2018-10-31
Uncertainty always exists in the overseas mining investment environment.Based on related literatures,expert experience and the data from the World Bank,etc,risk factors of the overseas mining investment environment were identified.A risk evaluation index system was established with political policies,economy and finance,society and culture,and infrastructure facilities as four primary indexes.Delphi method was used to determine the index weights,and the secondary indexes were graded according to the data from the World Bank,etc and recognized grading rules.The principle of contingency theory was introduced to establish an evaluation model with incentive variable weights.Twelve countries were selected for applications.The evaluation results show that countries with lower mining environmental risks are Canada,the United States,New Zealand,and Romania,which are the preferred areas for mining investment;countries with general risks are Philippines,South Africa,Australia and Mexico,which are the sub-selected areas;countries with higher risks are Russia,Kazakhstan,Kenya and Brazil,which are the cautious-selected areas.Meanwhile,more attentions should be paid to the extreme indicators which may have adversely impacts on the operations of the project.Finally,some relevant suggestions were put forward,which may be helpful for the mining companies to reduce the investment risks and provide decision basis for the government to formulate overseas mining investment policies and implement classified management.
Minggui ZHENG , Zhiliang HU . Study on Environmental Risk Evaluation of Overseas Mining Investment[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2018 , 26(5) : 596 -604 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2018.05.596
1 |
姜雅. 基于灰色系统理论的境外矿业投资风险研究与评价[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2017.
|
2 |
常兴国. 中国矿业走出去——历程、现状、总结、启示[M].北京:地质出版社,2015.
|
3 |
王文创. 我国矿业企业“走出去”模式研究[J].国家行政学院学报,2006(4):73-76.
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
吴尚昆. 中国矿业外资投资环境研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2004.
|
12 |
任杰. 海外矿产资源项目投资风险评估与实物期权研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2014.
|
13 |
陈俊楠. 我国区域矿业投资环境竞争力评价研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2016.
|
14 |
邢佳韵,于汶加,张若然,等. 中国在哈萨克斯坦矿业投资区域优选评价研究[J].资源科学,2015,37(5):1076-1085.
|
15 |
雷蕾. 菲律宾矿业投资环境研究——镍、铜为例[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2015.
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
霍再强,陆海松. 区域投资环境综合评判及其应用研究[J].中国流通经济,2008(2):62-65.
|
20 |
张振辉,达庆利. 灰色系统理论在企业并购风险识别中的应用[J].科研管理,2003,24(6):1-5.
|
21 |
李志民. 基于敏感性分析的矿业投资决策持续优化研究[J].财政研究,2008(8):34-37.
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
杨立,汤尚颖. 湘鄂西铅锌矿可持续发展的层次模糊评价研究[J].生态经济,2013(11):145-150.
|
27 |
仰炬,张朋柱. 基于粗糙集信息熵投资优序评价模型实证研究[J].经济管理,2004(14):18-22.
|
28 |
张雪梅,李春华,赵燕.VaR方法在海外矿业投资风险管理中的应用框架研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(增2):344-348.
|
29 |
李一文. 我国海外投资风险预警研究[J].管理世界,2016(9):178-179.
|
30 |
|
31 |
汪培庄. 模糊集与随机集落影[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1985.
|
32 |
刘文奇. 均衡函数及其在变权综合中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997(4):58-64,75.
|
33 |
刘文奇. 变权综合中的惩罚—激励效用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998(4):41-47.
|
34 |
刘文奇. 变权综合的激励策略及其解法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998(12):40-43.
|
35 |
钱航,邵云飞,殷俊杰. 物联网产业联盟风险评估——基于变权理论与可拓理论的结合[J].技术经济,2015,34(6):121-127.
|
36 |
钟昌宝. 一种供应链风险综合评价方法——变权可拓物元法[J].科技管理研究,2012(3):31-33,50.
|
37 |
舒帮荣,黄琪,刘友兆,等. 基于变权的城镇用地扩展生态适宜性空间模糊评价——以江苏省太仓市为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(3):402-412.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |