Gold Science and Technology
img

Wechat

Adv. Search
Online Submission Peer Review Office Work

Gold Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 414-426.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2022.03.130

• Mining Technology and Mine Management • Previous Articles    

Numerical Simulation of Homogeneous Rock Mass Damage Caused by Two-hole Simultaneous Blasting Based on RHT Model

Weihua WANG(),Yang LIU(),Liwei ZHANG,Henggen ZHANG   

  1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering，Central South University，Changsha 410083，Hunan，China
  • Received:2021-09-17 Revised:2022-03-10 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-09-14
  • Contact: Yang LIU E-mail:xhaiyz@163.com;1137510136@qq.com

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

252

Abstract:

Due to the complex nature of rock mass and the different transfer modes of explosive energy，it is difficult to control the blasting process and blasting effect.After blasting，the damage of rock mass around blast holes is related to the bearing capacity and stability of the project.In order to explore the influence of blast hole spacing and additional free surface on the blasting process and effect during double-hole blasting，a double-hole blasting model was established based on RHT （Riedel Hiermaier Thoma） damage constitutive model by using LS-DYNA finite element software to simulate rock blasting damage under different working conditions.The experiment of previous scholars was repeated by numerical simulation，and the test results were compared with the numerical simulation results in this paper to verify the feasibility of the numerical simulation method and the rationality of the selection of material parameters.Through the comparative analysis between numerical simulation results and blasting experimental results，it is determined that the rock blasting damage threshold applicable to this paper is 0.5 based on the blasting mechanism，and the rock damage value greater than 0.5，which is called the effective damage of rock.The effective damage rate of rock is defined as the proportion of the effective damage range of rock in the plane damage cloud map to the total plane area.The change of effective damage rate of rock is used to intuitively show the temporal and spatial evolution law of rock damage in the blasting process.The rock damage nephograms at different times were intercepted to observe the damage in different directions of the rock after blasting.The damage nephograms were processed by LS-PrePost to obtain the distribution range of effective damage on the plane.Then，the MATLAB program was used to calculate the effective damage rate，and the numerical calculation and analysis were carried out.The results show that the effective damage rate of rock decreases with the increase of blast hole spacing，and the effective damage rate at the same section is the largest in the scheme with the smallest blast hole spacing.The superposition effect of blasting energy between adjacent blastholes decreases with the increase of blast hole spacing，and a more ideal blasting effect can be obtained with an appropriate blast hole spacing.The effective damage rate of rock decreases gradually with the increase of the distance between the free surface and the center of the blast hole，and the blasting energy tends to propagate to the free surface.The influence of additional free surface on the distribution of blasting energy decreases with the increase of the distance between the free surface and the blast hole.

Key words: double-hole blasting, numerical simulation, RHT model, hole spacing, free surface, effective damage rate of rock

CLC Number: 

  • TD235

Table 1

Basic parameters of rock RHT model"

参数符号参数名称取值
RO密度/（kg·m-3）2 660
FS*相对抗剪强度/MPa0.21
FT*相对抗拉强度/MPa0.04
SHEAR弹性剪切模量/GPa21.9
FC单轴抗压强度/MPa167.8
D1损伤系数0.04
D21
EOC参考压缩应变率3.0E-5
EOT参考拉伸应变率3.0E-6
EC失效压缩应变率3.0E+25
ET失效拉伸应变率3.0E+25
BETAC压缩应变率指数0.0074
BETAT拉伸应变率指数0.0104
A失效面参数2.51
N0.72
Q0拉—压子午比参数0.68
B罗德角相关系数0.05
GC*压缩屈服面参数0.53
GT*拉伸屈服面参数0.7
PFT压缩对拉伸塑性流动的影响0.001
EPSF侵蚀塑性应变2.0
XI剪切模量衰减系数0.5
EPM最小失效应变0.015
AF残余强度面参数0.25
NF0.62
ALPHA初始空隙率1.08
NP孔隙度指数3.0
PEL压碎压力/MPa115.4
PCO压实压力/GPa6
GAMMA状态方程参数（体积压缩）/GPa0.0
A136.22
A253.22
A323.15
B0状态方程参数1.22
B11.22
T1状态方程参数（体积膨胀）/GPa36.22
T20.0

Table 2

Explosive material parameter"

参数取值参数取值
Ρ/（kg·m-3）1 300R14.2
D/（m·s-1）4 000R20.9
A/kPa2 14.4ω0.15
B/kPa0.182E0/kPa4.192

Table 3

Air material parameter"

参数取值参数取值
ρ/（kg·m-3）1.29C40.4
C00C50.4
C10C60
C20E0/kPa2.5
C30

Fig.1

Comparison between numerical simulation and model test results"

Fig.2

Peak rock pressure at different distances from the blasthole wall"

Fig.3

Distribution range of rock with different damage degrees"

Fig.4

Schematic diagram of blast hole filling structure and numerical model of double hole blasting （blast hole spacing is 0.6 m）"

Fig.5

Damage nephogram of double hole blasting at typical time"

Fig.6

Final rock damage distribution map of each scheme of double-hole blasting under different hole spacing"

Fig.7

Schematic of “slice” of double hole blasting（taking the hole spacing of 0.6 m as an example）"

Fig.8

Radial effective damage rates of each scheme in X1 and X2 directions"

Fig.9

Schematic diagram of blast hole filling structure with two free surfaces and numerical model of double hole blasting （blast holes are 0.6 m away from the free surface）"

Fig. 10

Damage nephogram of rock at typical time"

Fig. 11

Post-explosion cavities for each scheme"

Fig. 12

Radial effective damage rates of each scheme in Y1 and Y2 directions"

Bai Yu， Zhu Wancheng， Wei Chenhui，et al，2013.Numerical simulation of double hole blasting under different in-situ stress conditions ［J］ .Geotechnical mechanics，14（Supp.1）：466-471.
Banadaki M M D，2010.Stress-Wave Induced Fracture in Rock Due to Explosion Action［D］.Toronto：University of Toronto.
Borrvall T， Riedel W，2009.The RHT concrete model in LS-DYNA［C］// Proceedings of the 8th European LS-DYNA Users Conference. California： Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Cui Zhengrong， Wang Yu， Yi Haibao，et al，2019.Numerical simulation and experimental study on rock mass damage caused by double hole blasting under deep high ground stress［J］.Blasting，36（2）：59-64.
Hu Yingguo， Lu Wenbo， Chen Ming，et al，2012.Comparison and improvement of rock blasting damage models［J］.Geotechnical Mechanics，33（11）：3278-3284.
Huang Youpeng， Wang Zhiliang， Bi Chengcheng，2018.Simulation analysis of blasting damage range and damage distribution characteristics of rock［J］.Hydro-Science and Engine-ering，（5）：95-102.
Jayasinghe L B， Shang J， Zhao Z，et al，2019.Numerical investigation into the blasting -induced damage characteristics of rocks considering the role of in-situ stresses and discontinuity persistence［J］.Computers and Geotechnics，116：103207.
Liu K， Li Q Y， Wu C Q，et al，2018.A study of cut blasting for one-step raise excavation based on numerical simulation and field blast tests［J］ .International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，109：91-104.
Liu Liang， Lu Wenbo， Chen Ming，et al，2016.Statistical study on damage threshold of rock mass in critical fracture state under drilling and blasting excavation［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，35（6）：1133-1140.
LSTC，2006.LS-DYNA Theory Manual［M］.California：Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Shen S W， Zhao Y， Liu C，et al，2021.Penetration form of inter-hole cracks under double-hole blasting conditions with inclined fissures［J］.Advances in Civil Engineering，.
Shen Shiwei， Li Guoliang， Li Dong，et al，2019.Crack propagation law of double hole blasting under different angle prefabricated cracks［J］.Acta Coal Sinica，12（10）：3049-3057.
Sun Conghuang， Qu Yandong， Kong Xiangqing，et al，2017.Numerical simulation of double hole blasting effect in rock media［J］.Blasting，4（3）：37-45，130.
Wu B， Xu S X， Meng G W，et al，2021.Study on the dynamic evolution of through-crack in the double hole of elliptical bipolar linear-shaped charge blasting［J］.Shock and Vibration，.
Xia Xiang， Li Junru， Li Haibo，et al，2007.Damage characteristics of blasting excavation rock mass in Ling’ao nuclear power station，Guangdong［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26（12）：2510-2516.
Xie L X， Lu W B， Zhang Q B，et al，2017.Analysis of damage mechanisms and optimization of cut blasting design under high in-situ stresses［J］.Tunnelling and Underground Pace Technology，66：19-33．
Yang Jianhua， Sun Wenbin， Yao Chi，et al，2020.Rock breaking mechanism of porous blasting in high stress rock mass ［J］.Explosion and Impact，40（7）：118-127.
Yang Renshu， Wang Yanbing， Yue Zhongwen，et al，2013.Dynamic behavior of crack propagation in directional fracture double hole blasting［J］.Explosion and Impact，7（6）：631-637．
Yi C， Sjöberg J， Johansson D，2017.Numerical modelling for blast-induced fragmentation in sublevel caving mines［J］ .Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，68：167-173.
Yue Zhongwen， Guo Yang， Yang Xu，2015.Experimental study on crack propagation behavior of slotted hole under blast loading［J］.Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，34 （10）：2018-2026．
Zhang X L， Jiao Y Y， Ma J F，2018.Simulation of rock dynamic failure using discontinuous numerical approach ［J］.Computers and Geotechnics，96：160-166.
Zhao J J， Zhang Y， Ranjith P G，2017.Numerical simulation of blasting-induced fracture expansion in coal masses ［J］.International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，100：28-39.
白羽，朱万成，魏晨慧，等，2013.不同地应力条件下双孔爆破的数值模拟［J］ .岩土力学，14（增1）：466-471.
崔正荣，汪禹，仪海豹，等，2019.深部高地应力条件下双孔爆破岩体损伤数值模拟及试验研究［J］.爆破，36（2）：59-64.
胡英国，卢文波，陈明，2012.岩石爆破损伤模型的比选与改进［J］.岩土力学，33（11）：3278-3284.
黄佑鹏，王志亮，毕程程，2018.岩石爆破损伤范围及损伤分布特征模拟分析［J］.水利水运工程学报，（5）：95-102.
刘亮，卢文波，陈明，等，2016.钻爆开挖条件下岩体临界破碎状态的损伤阈值统计研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报，35（6）：1133-1140.
沈世伟，李国良，李冬，等，2019.不同角度预制裂隙条件下双孔爆破裂纹扩展规律［J］ .煤炭学报，12（10）：3049-3057.
孙从煌，曲艳东，孔祥清，等，2017.岩石介质中双孔爆破效应的数值模拟研究［J］ .爆破，4（3）：37-45，130．
夏祥，李俊如，李海波，2007.广东岭澳核电站爆破开挖岩体损伤特征研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报，26（12）：2510-2516.
杨建华，孙文彬，姚池，等，2020.高地应力岩体多孔爆破破岩机制［J］.爆炸与冲击，40（7）：118-127.
杨仁树，王雁冰，岳中文，等，2013.定向断裂双孔爆破裂纹扩展的动态行为［J］ .爆炸与冲击，7（6）：631-637.
岳中文，郭洋，杨煦，2015.切槽孔爆炸载荷下裂纹扩展行为的实验研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报，34（10）：2018-2026．
[1] Lingzhi ZHONG,Xiancheng MAO,Zhankun LIU,Keyan XIAO,Chuntan WANG,Wu CHEN. Ore-controlling Effect of Structural Geometry Features in the Sanshandao Gold Belt，Jiaodong Peninsula，China： Insights from Numerical Simulation [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2022, 30(3): 352-365.
[2] Xuan FU,Linqi HUANG,Jiangzhan CHEN,Yangchun WU,Xibing LI. Meeting the Challenge of High Geothermal Ground Temperature Environ-ment in Deep Mining—Research on Geothermal Ground Temperature Simula-tion Platform of Rock True Triaxial Testing Machine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2022, 30(1): 72-84.
[3] Dan HUANG,He CHEN,Zhijie ZHENG. Model of the Height of Overburden Fracture Zone Based on Void Conservation [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(6): 843-853.
[4] Hongwei DENG,Zhiming ZHONG,Guanglin TIAN. Numerical Simulation of Sectional Oxygen⁃Enrichment Ventilation in Plateau Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(5): 698-708.
[5] Lulu XU,Qinli ZHANG,Ru FENG. Numerical Simulation of Backfill Strength Based on Optimization Results of Stope Structural Parameters [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(3): 421-432.
[6] Jingkai JIA,Gun HUANG,Long WANG,Qiang CHENG,Libing ZHEN. Study on a New Method of Weakening End Effect in Uniaxial Compression Test [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(3): 382-391.
[7] Jin HUANG,Kewei LIU,Shaohu JIN. Numerical Simulation Study of High-strength Projectile Penetrating White Granite Target [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(3): 411-420.
[8] Weihua WANG,Jie LUO,Tian LIU,Zhenyu HAN. Particle Flow Simulation on Influence of Joint Roughness Coefficient on Stress Wave Propagation and Specimens Failure [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(2): 208-217.
[9] Xuebin XIE,Shan GAO,Jiang GUO,Yongfei YE. Numerical Simulation Study on the Response Law of Pressure Arch Height of Deep-buried Tunnel Under Seismic Dynamic Load [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(2): 226-235.
[10] Peng JIN,Kewei LIU,Xudong LI,Jiacai YANG. Numerical Simulation Study of Crack Propagation in Deep Rock Mass Under Water-coupling Blasting [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2021, 29(1): 108-119.
[11] Jianhua HU,Le PANG,Xueliang WANG,Minghua ZHENG. Optimization of Roadway Support Parameters in Soft Broken Sections Based on Orthogonal Test [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(6): 859-867.
[12] Chenglong WANG,Chenglu HOU,Shanghuan YANG,Xingdong ZHAO. Control Technology of High Stress Broken Surrounding Rock in Kilometer Deep Shaft [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(6): 885-893.
[13] Zeyou LI, Rui HUANG, Shuqi ZHAO, Xue SHEN, E WU. Ventilation Method Optimization of Dust Extraction in an Excavation Roadway of High-altitude Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(5): 743-752.
[14] Huaibin SU, Qinli ZHANG, Deming ZHANG, Changgen ZENG, Xiaojiang ZHU. Study on the Optimization of Stope Structure Parameters in the Large-scale Backfilling Mining of Rangjialong Silver Mine [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(4): 550-557.
[15] Guicheng HE, Kexu CHEN, Bing DAI, Chengcheng WANG. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation Analysis of Crack Propagation Characteristics of Crisscross Fracture [J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(4): 509-520.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

©2018 Gold Science and Technology　

Telephone：0931-8277791　

E-mail: hjkx@lzb.ac.cn Postcode：730000　

Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd

陇ICP备17001318号-1