[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
采选技术与矿山管理

资源型企业数字化转型的组态路径研究

  • 郑明贵 , 1, 2 ,
  • 顾东明 , 1 ,
  • 陶思敏 1 ,
  • 陈美玲 1
展开
  • 1. 江西理工大学经济管理学院,江西 赣州 341000
  • 2. 中国科学技术大学管理学院,安徽 合肥 230026
顾东明(1999-),男,江西赣州人,硕士研究生,从事数字化转型与资源经济管理方面的研究工作。

郑明贵(1978-),男,安徽颍上人,教授,博士生导师,从事资源经济与管理方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2023-03-03

  修回日期: 2023-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2024-01-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目“大数据环境下的评价理论、方法和应用”(71631006)

Study on the Configuration Path of Digital Transformation of Resource-based Enterprises

  • Minggui ZHENG , 1, 2 ,
  • Dongming GU , 1 ,
  • Simin TAO 1 ,
  • Meiling CHEN 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
  • 2. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China

Received date: 2023-03-03

  Revised date: 2023-06-28

  Online published: 2024-01-26

摘要

推进资源型企业数字化转型,是破解企业发展困境和实现高质量发展的有效路径。基于“压力—能力—动力”视角,采用NCA和fsQCA方法,对我国资源型企业数字化转型进行组态分析。研究发现:资源型企业数字化转型并非由单一条件驱动,而是多条件协同联动的结果;产生高水平数字化转型的组态有3种类型,即以大型企业为主的回应压力的创新能力驱动型、压力下的政府引领型和以中小型企业为主的综合驱动型;产生非高水平数字化转型的组态有2种类型,即安居乐业型和创新能力与动力双弱型;市场竞争在资源型企业数字化转型中发挥着关键作用。研究结果揭示了不同资源型企业数字化转型中各因素间的交互作用,可以为资源型企业实现数字化转型提供理论指导和路径参考。

本文引用格式

郑明贵 , 顾东明 , 陶思敏 , 陈美玲 . 资源型企业数字化转型的组态路径研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023 , 31(6) : 978 -989 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2023.06.039

Abstract

Promoting the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises is an effective path to crack the development dilemma of enterprises and achieve high-quality development.Due to the significant differences in resource-based enterprises’ resource endowments and transformation capabilities,the degree of digital transformation also shows significant differences.So,what combination of influencing factors can effectively promote the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises?What are the differentiated transformation paths that different resource-based enterprises should follow?At the same time,the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises is a complex systemic project,and previous studies are limited in exploring it only from a single dimension.This paper took resource-based enterprises in China as the research object,from the perspective of “pressure-capacity-drive”,it refined into six antecedent conditions:market competition,growth capability,resource integration capability,innovation capability,enterprise size and financial support.Using NCA and fsQCA methods,it analyzed the relationship between the six antecedent conditions and the NCA and fsQCA methods were used to analyze the complex causal relationships between the six antecedent conditions and the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises.The study found that:The digital transformation of resource-based enterprises is not driven by a single condition,but it is the result of the synergy of multiple conditions.There are three types of groupings that generate high-level digital transformation,namely,the innovation capability-driven type that responds to pressure,the government-led type under pressure and the comprehensive-driven type,mainly by SMEs.There are two types of groupings that generate non-high-level digital transformation,namely,the settled type and the type with both weak innovation capability and drive.And market competition plays a key role in the digital transformation of resource-based enterprises.The results of the study reveal the interaction between various factors in the digital transformation of different resource-based enterprises,which can provide theoretical guidance and path references for resource-based enterprises to realise digital transformation.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

脚注

http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2023/1005-2518/1005-2518-2023-31-6-978.shtml

Bell R G Filatotchev I Aguilera R V2014.Corporate governance and investors’perceptions of foreign IPO Value:An institutional perspective[J].Academy of Management Jou-rnal57(1):301-320.

Chen Lianfang Huang Weize2017.Economic globalization’s effects on development of mineral resources industry in China and countermeasures[J].China Mining Magazine26(4):21-27.

Cheng Qiongwen Ding Hongyi2022.Research on the impact of tax incentives on the digital transform of resource-based enterprises[J].Chinese Journal of Management19(8):1125-1133.

Doblinger C Surana K Anadon L D2019.Governments as partners:The role of alliances in U.S. cleantech startup innovation[J].Research Policy48(6):1458-1475.

Du Yunzhou Jia Liangding2017.Group perspective and qualitative comparative analysis(QCA):A new path for management research[J].Management World,(6):155-167.

Du Yunzhou Liu Qiuchen Cheng Jianqing2020.What kind of ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial activity?A research based on institutional configurations[J].Management World36(9):141-155.

Dul J2018.Necessary condition analysis(NCA):Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient”causality[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,(12):455-466.

Dul J Laan E Kuik R2020.A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis[J].Sage Publications23(2):385-395.

Fiss P C2011.Building better causal theories:A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal54(2):393-420.

García-Quevedo J Pellegrino G Vivarelli M2014.R&D drivers and age:Are young firms different?[J].Research Policy43(9):1544-1556.

Gong Xinshu Jin Mei2023.The impact of business environment and government support on enterprise digital transformation:An empirical study based on text mining of annual reports of listed companies[J].Science and Technology Progress and Policy40(2):90-99.

Gong Yinyin Duan Zongzhi2022.Research on the critical path of digital transformation of construction enterprises considering scale differences[J].Construction Economy43(2):84-90.

Greckhamer T Furnari S Fiss P C,et al,2018.Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis[J].Strategic Organization16(4):482-495.

Guo Xiaochuan Pan Yuyao Du Yaru2019.Research on new technology convergence,dynamic capability and performance of resource enterprises[J].Scientific Management Research37(6):113-118.

Jiang Wen Gui Bingxiu Zhang Huyuan,et al,2023.Identification and empirical analysis of the driving factors of military industry digital transformation[J].Journal of Industrial Technological Economics42(1):71-78.

Li Lei Yang Shuili Chen Na2023.Antecedent configuration of digital transformation and its performance:Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed companies[J].Science and Technology Progress and Policy40(16):32-41.

Ragin C C2008.Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal order[J].Sociological Methods and Research36(4):431-441.

Tang Song Su Xuesha Zhao Danni2022.Fintech and enterprise digital transformation—From the perspective of enterprise life cycle[J].Finance and Economics407(2):17-32.

Tong Yu2022.Research on the influencing factors of manufacturing digital transformation[J].Journal of Technical Economics and Management308(3):124-128.

Wang C L Ahmed P K2007.Dynamic capabilities:A review and research agenda[J].International Journal of Management Reviews9(1):31-51.

Wang Fengzheng Liu Yujia Sun Yue2020.Institutional environment,open innovation and transformation of resource-based enterprises[J].Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures37(5):114-123.

Wang Ye Chen Yang Cui Xiao2022.Change or stability:Research on the influence mechanism of dynamic capabilities on firm’s digital transformation[J].Dongyue Tribune43(8):88-96.

Wu Fei Chang Xi Ren Xiaoyi2021a.Government-driven innovation:Fiscal technology expenditure and enterprise digital transformation[J].Fiscal Studies455(1):102-115.

Wu Fei Hu Huizhi Lin Huiyan,et al,2021b.Enterprise digital transformation and capital market performance:Empirical evidence from stock liquidity[J].Journal of Management World37(7):130-144.

Wu Jiang Chen Ting Gong Yiwei,et al,2021.Digital transformation of firms:Theoretical framework and research prospects[J].Chinese Journal of Management18(12):1871-1880.

Yu Desheng Li Xing2021.Enterprise financialization,product market competition and enterprise innovation [J].Financial Development Research471(3):20-25.

Zeng Hao2022.Does market competition mechanism promote enterprise digital transformation?A quasi-natural experiment based on the negative list system of market access[J/OL].Foreign Economics and Management:1-18[2023-12-07].

Zhang Lingang Dai Guoqing Xiong Yan,et al,2022.Evaluation and influencing factors of digital transformation of the manufacturing industry in China:Based on qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy set[J].Science and Technology Management Research42(7):68-78.

Zhang Ming Chen Weihong Lan Hailin2019.Why do Chinese enterprises completely acquire foreign high-tech enterprises—A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA) based on 94 cases[J].China Industrial Economics,(4):117-135.

Zhang Xiaheng2020.Obstacles,driving factors and path dependence of digital transformation of small and medium-sized enterprises—An investigation based on the survey of 377 small and medium-sized enterprises[J].China Business and Market34(12):72-82.

Zhao Chenyu Wang Wenchun Li Xuesong2021.How does digital transformation affect the total factor productivity of enterprises?[J].Finance and Trade Economics42(7):114-129.

Zhao Feng Wang Tienan Wang Yu2016.External technology acquisition in open innovation and product diversification:The moderating effect of dynamic capabilities[J].Management Review28(6):76-85,99.

Zheng Minggui Dong Juan Zhong Changbiao2022.Influence mechanism of capital deepening on total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises[J].Resources Science44(3):536-553.

Zheng Minggui Gu Dongming Qiu Junyuan2023.Analysis on the configuration path of regional green development:Based on TOE theoretical framework[J].Finance and Accounting Monthly44(12):124-130.

Zheng Minggui You Biying Wu Ping2021.Can commercial credit financing promote the high quality development of mining enterprises—Based on the moderating effect of enterprise scale[J].Gold Science and Technology29(6):874-883.

陈莲芳,黄伟泽,2017.经济全球化对我国矿产资源产业发展的影响及对策[J].中国矿业26(4):21-27.

成琼文,丁红乙,2022.税收优惠对资源型企业数字化转型的影响研究[J].管理学报19(8):1125-1133.

杜运周,贾良定,2017.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,(6):155-167.

杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青,2020.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界36(9):141-155.

龚新蜀,靳媚,2023.营商环境与政府支持对企业数字化转型的影响——来自上市企业年报文本挖掘的实证[J].科技进步与对策40(2):90-99.

龚银银,段宗志,2022.考虑规模差异的建筑企业数字化转型关键路径研究[J].建筑经济43(2):84-90.

郭晓川,潘雨瑶,杜雅茹,2019.新技术融合、动态能力与资源型企业绩效研究[J].科学管理研究37(6):113-118.

蒋雯,桂秉修,张湖源,等,2023.军工企业数字化转型驱动因素识别及实证分析[J].工业技术经济42(1):71-78.

李雷,杨水利,陈娜,2023.数字化转型的前因组态与绩效研究——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策40(16):32-41.

唐松,苏雪莎,赵丹妮,2022.金融科技与企业数字化转型——基于企业生命周期视角[J].财经科学407(2):17-32.

童雨,2022.中国制造业数字化转型的影响因素研究[J].技术经济与管理研究308(3):124-128.

王锋正,刘宇嘉,孙玥,2020.制度环境、开放式创新与资源型企业转型[J].科技进步与对策37(5):114-123.

王晔,陈洋,崔箫,2022.求变还是求稳:动态能力对企业数字化转型的影响机制研究[J].东岳论丛43(8):88-96.

吴非,常曦,任晓怡,2021a.政府驱动型创新:财政科技支出与企业数字化转型[J].财政研究455(1):102-115.

吴非,胡慧芷,林慧妍,等,2021b.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界37(7):130-144.

吴江,陈婷,龚艺巍,等,2021.企业数字化转型理论框架和研究展望[J].管理学报18(12):1871-1880.

余得生,李星,2021.企业金融化、产品市场竞争与企业创新[J].金融发展研究471(3):20-25.

曾皓,2022.市场竞争机制促进了企业数字化转型吗?——基于市场准入负面清单制度的准自然实验[J/OL].外国经济与管理:1-18[2023-12-07].

张林刚,戴国庆,熊焰,等,2022.中国制造业数字化转型评价及影响因素——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J].科技管理研究42(7):68-78.

张明,陈伟宏,蓝海林,2019.中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业——基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J].中国工业经济,(4):117-135.

张夏恒,2020.中小企业数字化转型障碍、驱动因素及路径依赖——基于对377家第三产业中小企业的调查[J].中国流通经济34(12):72-82.

赵宸宇,王文春,李雪松,2021.数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J].财贸经济42(7):114-129.

赵凤,王铁男,王宇,2016.开放式创新中的外部技术获取与产品多元化:动态能力的调节作用研究[J].管理评论28(6):76-85,99.

郑明贵,董娟,钟昌标,2022.资本深化对中国资源型企业全要素生产率的影响[J].资源科学44(3):536-553.

郑明贵,顾东明,邱均远,2023.地区绿色发展组态路径分析——基于TOE的理论框架[J].财会月刊44(12):124-130.

郑明贵,尤碧莹,吴萍,2021.商业信用融资能否促进矿业企业高质量发展——基于企业规模的调节效应[J].黄金科学技术29(6):874-883.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]