img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1112/TF 
  • ISSN 1005-2518 
  • 创刊于1988年
高级检索
采选技术与矿山管理

黄金尾矿两种无害化处理方案生命周期评价

  • 陆思成 ,
  • 黄仁东 ,
  • 石英
展开
  • 中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
陆思成(1998-),男,湖南耒阳人,硕士研究生,从事工业固废处理和资源化利用研究工作。916043689@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-03-20

  修回日期: 2023-05-25

  网络出版日期: 2023-11-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目“大范围分步回采能量演化与动态平衡机理研究”(52174140);“骨料磷石膏对胶结充填体材料性能影响及改性研究”(42177160)

Life Cycle Assessment of Two Harmless Treatment Options for Gold Tailings

  • Sicheng LU ,
  • Rendong HUANG ,
  • Ying SHI
Expand
  • School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China

Received date: 2023-03-20

  Revised date: 2023-05-25

  Online published: 2023-11-21

摘要

以含氰黄金尾矿无害化处理过程为研究对象,运用生命周期评价(LCA)方法构建了2种方案的评价模型,对尾矿压滤洗涤、滤渣处理和滤液处理的环境负荷及资源消耗进行定量评估。结果表明:(1)方案2的尾矿毒性水平比方案1降低了98.5%,但整体环境影响并未降低;(2)方案1的主要环境问题是淡水生态毒性,方案2中环境影响从大到小依次是资源枯竭、淡水生态毒性和人类毒性等;(3)方案1中芬顿降硫氰和尾矿干堆是影响整体环境的主要环节,尾矿干堆对人类非致癌毒性和淡水生态毒性贡献超过50%,方案2中尾矿芬顿脱氰在14个环境影响指标中都是核心问题。2种方案中使用的大量化学药剂是主要的环境影响要素,电能影响较小。与方案1相比,方案2出现环境影响转移,体现在环境影响的形式与关键环节发生变化。从整体环境影响来看,尾矿的处理思路可以朝着药品减量和使用清洁环保物质方向发展。

本文引用格式

陆思成 , 黄仁东 , 石英 . 黄金尾矿两种无害化处理方案生命周期评价[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2023 , 31(5) : 845 -855 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2023.05.044

Abstract

The harmless treatment process of cyanide-containing gold tailings were used as the subject of study.The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method was applied to construct evaluation models for two options to quantitatively assess the environmental load and resource consumption of tailings press washing,filter residue treatment and filtrate treatment.The results show that:(1) The tailings toxicity level in Option 2 is 98.5% lower than that in Option 1,but does not achieve a lower overall environmental impact;(2) The main environmental issue in Option 1 is freshwater ecotoxicity,while the environmental impacts in Option 2 are,in descending order,resource depletion,freshwater ecotoxicity and human toxicity;(3) The Thiocyanide reduction with Fenton and dry stacking of tailings in Option 1 are the main links that affect the overall environment with the dry stacking of tailings contributing over 50% to human non-carcinogenic toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity,and the cyanide removal with Fenton from tailings in Option 2 is the most central issue in all 14 environmental impact indicators.The large number of chemicals used in both options is a major element of the environmental impact while electrical energy shows low environmental impact.The transfer of environmental impacts from Option 1 to Option 2 occurs in terms of form,volume and linkage.In terms of overall environmental impact,the treatment of tailings can move towards pharmaceutical reduction and the use of clean,environmentally friendly substances.

参考文献

null Chen W, Geng Y, Hong J,et al,2018.Life cycle assessment of gold production in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,179:143-150.
null Cheng P, Jin Q, Jiang H,et al,2020.Efficiency assessment of rural domestic sewage treatment facilities by a slacked-based dea model[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,267:122111..
null Chi Chongzhe, Zhai Jubin, Lan Xinhui,et al,2022.Analysis of comprehensive utilization of gold tailings[J].Gold,43(2):100-103.
null Chi Chunxia,2006.Developing Strategies Study on the Basic of Gold Mining Enterprise[D].Fuyang:Liaoning Technical University.
null Dou Na, Zhao Fucai, Li Yuxi,et al,2021.Test research on cyanidation tailings treatment by NaHSO3-air method[J].Energy Saving of Nonferrous Metallurgy,37(4):20-24.
null Guo Lijie, Liu Guangsheng, Ma Qinghai,et al,2022.Research progress on mining with backfill technology of underground metalliferous mine[J].Journal of China Coal Society,47(12):4182-4200.
null Jiang H, Jin Q, Cheng P,et al,2021.How are typical urban sewage treatment technologies going in China:From the perspective of life cycle environmental and economic coupled assessment[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,28(33):45109-45120.
null Li Xibing, Liu Bing, Yao Jinrui,et al,2018.Theory and practice of green mine backfill with whole phosphate waste[J].The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals,28(9):1845-1865.
null Li Xibing, Zhou Jian, Huang Linqi,et al,2020.Review and prospect of gold mining technology in China[J].Gold,41(9):41-50.
null Liu Q, Luo Y, Shi J,2022.Reagent elution combined with positive pressure filtration:A zero-discharge method for cyanide tailings remediation[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,113:376-384.
null Liu Yunhan, Liu Chaofeng, Li Yibing,et al,2022.NaClO-enhanced Fenton process for oxidation of hypophosphite and simultaneous recovery of ferric phosphate[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,42(5):247-253.
null Cuicui Lü,2017.Applied Fundamental Research of Comprehensive Recovering Valuable Elements from Cyanidation Tailing[D].Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Institute of Process Engineering,Chinese Academy of Sciences).
null Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China,2020. Standard for pollution control on the non-hazardous industrial solid waste storage and landfill: [S].Beijing:Ministry of Ecology and Enviro-nment of the People’s Republic of China.
null Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China,2018. Technical specification for pollution control of cyanide leaching residue in gold industry: [S].Beijing:Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China.
null Patel K, Singh S K,2022.A life cycle approach to environmental assessment of wastewater and sludge treatment processes[J].Water and Environment Journal,36(3):412-424.
null Rahdar S, Igwegbe C A, Ghasemi M,et al,2019.Degradation of aniline by the combined process of ultrasound and hydrogen peroxide (Us/H2O2)[J].Methodsx,6:492-499.
null Sun Xuyang,2016.The Research of H2O2/(Fe2+/Fe3+) Homogeneous Catalytic Oxidation System in Gold Wastewater Thiocyanate and Cyanide Regeneration[D].Dalian:Dalian Polytechnic University.
null Tang Peng, Lai Wei, Li Yana,et al,2020.Improvements of process for treating phenol cyanogen wastewater in coking and comprehensive utilization of the wastewater[J].Angang Technology,( 1):40-42.
null Tao Ming, Nie Kemi, Cheng Shibing,et al,2022.Environmental impact analysis of ecological cementitious material production based on LCA method[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,22(4):2176-2183.
null Wang Erzhen, Tian Fei, Fang Yufeng,et al,2022.Experimental research on ultrasound-ozone rapid degradation for polymer-containing flushing fluid[J].Industrial Water Treatme-nt: 1-11[2023-10-17].DOI:10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2022-1045 .
null Wang Qianqian, Wu Kaijian, Wang Lu,2022.Study on carbon emission of green mine construction in Bayan Obo Mine[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,41(1):12-16.
null Wang Wenqiang, Bao Yun, Zhang Quanzhen,2021.Experimental study on the treatment of cyanide-containing wastewater by two precipitation methods[J].Shandong Chemical Industry,50(23):231-232.
null Wu Baimiao, Zhang Yimei, Li Shuai,et al,2022.Comprehensive impact assessment on carbon neutralization of wastewater treatment plants based on hybridlca[J].Environmental Engineering,40(6):130-137.
null Xu Xiaoquan,2022.Environmental impact analysis of carbon dioxide blasting based on LCA method[J].Mining and Metallurgical Engineering,42(3):36-40.
null Yin Lu, Jin Zhenan, Yang Hongying,et al,2018.Present situation and forecast of gold resources utilization in China[J].Gold Science and Technology,26(1):17-24.
null Yuan Jiasheng, Chang Yongfeng, Zheng Chunlong,et al,2021.Re-view on treatment technologies of cyanide tailing[J].The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals,31(6):1568-1581.
null 迟崇哲,翟菊彬,兰馨辉,等,2022.黄金尾矿综合利用分析[J].黄金,43(2):100-103.
null 迟春霞,2006.基于黄金矿山企业生命周期的发展战略研究[D].阜新:辽宁工程技术大学.
null 豆娜,赵福财,李玉玺,等,2021.亚硫酸氢钠—空气法处理氰化尾渣试验研究[J].有色冶金节能,37(4):20-24.
null 郭利杰,刘光生,马青海,等,2022.金属矿山充填采矿技术应用研究进展[J].煤炭学报,47(12):4182-4200.
null 李夕兵,刘冰,姚金蕊,等,2018.全磷废料绿色充填理论与实践[J].中国有色金属学报,28(9):1845-1865.
null 李夕兵,周健,黄麟淇,等,2020.中国黄金矿山开采技术回顾与展望[J].黄金,41(9):41-50.
null 刘蕴晗,刘朝峰,李一兵,等,2022.次氯酸钠强化芬顿法处理废水中次磷酸盐同步回收磷酸铁[J].环境科学学报,42(5):247-253.
null 吕翠翠,2017.氰化渣中有价元素资源化高效回收的应用基础研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院过程工程研究所).
null 孙旭阳,2016.H2O2/(Fe2+/Fe3+)体系均相催化氧化金矿废水中硫氰化物及再生氰化物的研究[D].大连:大连工业大学.
null 唐鹏,来威,李亚娜,等,2020.焦化酚氰废水工艺改进及综合利用[J].鞍钢技术,(1):40-42.
null 陶明,聂克蜜,成诗冰,等,2022.基于LCA方法的生态胶凝材料生产环境影响分析[J].安全与环境学报,22(4):2176-2183.
null 王尔珍,田飞,方玉峰,等,2022.超声—臭氧快速降解油田含聚洗井液的试验研究[J].工业水处理: 1-11[2023-10-17].DOI:10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2022- 1045 .
null 王茜茜,吴凯建,王路,2022.白云鄂博矿绿色矿山建设碳排放研究[J].内蒙古科技大学学报,41(1):12-16.
null 王文强,包允,张全真,2021.两次沉淀法处理含氰废水的实验研究[J].山东化工,50(23):231-232.
null 吴百苗,张一梅,栗帅,等,2022.基于LCA的污水处理方案碳中和综合影响评价[J].环境工程,40(6):130-137.
null 许小泉,2022.基于LCA方法的二氧化碳爆破环境影响分析[J].矿冶工程,42(3):36-40.
null 袁嘉声,畅永锋,郑春龙,等,2021.氰化尾渣脱氰技术综述[J].中国有色金属学报,31(6):1568-1581.
null 殷璐,金哲男,杨洪英,等,2018.我国黄金资源综合利用现状与展望[J].黄金科学技术,26(1):17-24.
null 中华人民共和国生态环境部,2020. 一般工业固体废物贮存和填埋污染控制标准: [S].北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部.
null 中华人民共和国环境保护部,2018. 黄金行业氰渣污染控制技术规范: [S].北京:中华人民共和国环境保护部.
文章导航

/