[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
采选技术与矿山管理

联合改进作用距离和Dijkstra算法的复杂结构声发射定位方法及应用

  • 郑雨晴 ,
  • 陈勇 ,
  • 王进华 ,
  • 尚雪义 ,
  • 刘彩云
展开
  • 重庆大学资源与安全学院,煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044
尚雪义(1989-),男,四川南充人,副教授,从事金属矿地下开采和矿山安全监测研究工作。

郑雨晴(2001-),女,四川宜宾人,本科生,从事声发射监测方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2021-12-13

  修回日期: 2022-04-08

  网络出版日期: 2022-09-14

基金资助

国家级大学生创新训练计划资助项目“三维含孔洞结构声发射事件精准定位”(202110611102)

国家自然科学基金青年基金项目“硬岩开采诱发微震震源机制的贝叶斯波形反演及其演化规律研究”(52004041)

重庆市自然科学基金博士后面上项目“地下矿山三维高斯束层析成像与逆时偏移定位研究”(cstc2020jcyj-bshX0106)

Acoustic Emission Localization Method for Complex Structure Based on Improved Interaction Distance and Dijkstra Algorithm and Its Application

  • Yuqing ZHENG ,
  • Yong CHEN ,
  • Jinhua WANG ,
  • Xueyi SHANG ,
  • Caiyun LIU
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control,School of Resources Safety Engineering,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China

Received date: 2021-12-13

  Revised date: 2022-04-08

  Online published: 2022-09-14

本文亮点

声发射定位对含空区等复杂结构的连续动态安全监测具有重要意义。针对直线路径定位方法不适用于复杂结构,而常规Dijkstra搜索算法常出现局部最优路径等问题,提出了一种联合改进作用距离和Dijkstra算法的声发射定位方法,实现复杂结构下声发射的高精度定位。理论测试显示:基于改进作用距离的Dijkstra算法得到的P波传播路径长度小于等于常规作用距离的Dijkstra算法,即P波走时更为准确。理论测试和断铅试验定位测试表明:本文提出的定位方法在复杂结构声发射定位时的整体误差在0.50 cm范围之内,断铅事件平均定位误差由常规作用距离Dijkstra算法的0.95 cm下降至本文的0.54 cm。改进的声发射定位方法在复杂结构声发射定位方面具有很好的应用前景。

本文引用格式

郑雨晴 , 陈勇 , 王进华 , 尚雪义 , 刘彩云 . 联合改进作用距离和Dijkstra算法的复杂结构声发射定位方法及应用[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022 , 30(3) : 427 -437 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2022.03.194

Highlights

Acoustic emission source location plays an important role in the continuous dynamic safety monitoring of complex structures which contain empty zones. The straight path-based location method can’t be applied in a complex structure, and the existing Dijkstra search algorithm can obtain optimal local paths. This study improves the calculation method of the distance between two points: if the line determined by two points does not intersect the obstacle, the straight line distance between the two points is the reachable distance of two points, and the other ways are recorded as infinity.To solve this problem, an acoustic emission location method based on improved interaction distance and Dijkstra algorithm was proposed in this study. It uses the double-difference method to establish the positioning objective function and the mesh method to calculate the fitting error of the positioning objective function of each grid point, and takes the corresponding point of the minimum fit error as the positioning result, which to achieve a high-precision acoustic emission location in a complex structure. Tests were carried out with complex structures with rectangles, triangles, and circles and structures with single round holes. The results indicate that the P wave propagation path obtained by the Dijkstra algorithm with improved interaction distance is less than or equal to that obtained by the traditional Dijkstra algorithm. And the P wave propagation path containing the round pore structure is very close to the theoretical propagation distance. In other words, the P wave travel time based on improved interaction distance is more reliable. After adding 3us Gaussian noise to the theory, the positioning error of the conventional method reached 1.5cm, but the location method proposed in this study has an overall location error within 0.50 cm for complex structures. It shows that the proposed method has good robustness. Further, the lead-breaking experiment was carried out on the rectangular (30 cm×20 cm) granite sample containing a round hole (D=2.5 cm). After the double-difference method was used to remove the P wave initial to systematic error, the positioning error of the conventional method was mainly 0.5 to 1.5 cm, and the overall error of the positioning method in this paper was within the range of 0.50 cm, and the average positioning error for the lead breaking events from 0.95 cm of traditional Dijkstra algorithm to 0.54 cm for PLB events, which indicates that the proposed method has a good application prospect for complex structures.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

脚注

http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2022/1005-2518/1005-2518-2022-30-3-427.shtml

Baxter M G Pullin R Holford K M,et al,2007.Delta T source location for acoustic emission[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing21(3):1512-1520.

Dai Rui Zhang Da Ji Hu,et al,2019.A study on high precision location method of microseism in mine goafs[J].China Mining28(Supp.2):195-199.

Dang Mingzhi Zhang Jun Jia Mingtao2020.Application and research of microseismic monitoring technology and disaster early warning methods in Huangtupo copper and zinc mine[J].Gold Science and Technology28(2):246-254.

Dijkstra E W1959.A note on two problems in connexion with graphs[J].Numerical Mathematics,1959:269-271.

Dong L J Hu Q C Tong X J,et al,2020.Velocity-free MS/AE source location method for three-dimensional hole-containing structures[J].Engineering6(7):827-834.

Hu Q C Dong L J2020.Acoustic emission source location and experimental verification for two-dimensional irregular complex structure[J].IEEE Sensors Journal20(5):2679-2691.

Huang Guojiao Ba Jing Qian Wei2020.Simultaneous inversion for anisotropic velocity structure and microseismic location in layered TI media[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics63(7):2846-2857.

Jiang Tianqi Pei Shuojin2019.Micro-seismic event location based on Newton iteration method and grid-search method[J].Journal of Mining Science and Technology4(6):480-488.

Jiang Yuanjian Wang Liguan Peng Ping’an,et al,2019.Mine microseismic location method based on layered wave velocity model[J].Nonferrous Metal Engineering9(12):96-105.

Li N Wang E Y Ge M C,et al,2014.A nonlinear microseismic source location method based on simplex method and its residual analysis[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences7(11):4477-4486.

Li Nan Wang Enyuan Ge Maochen,et al,2013.A comprehensive evaluation model of microseismic source location reliability[J].Journal of China Coal Society38(11):1940-1946.

Li X B Wang Z W Dong L J2016.Locating single-point sources from arrival times containing large picking errors (LPEs):The virtual field optimization method (VFOM)[J].Scientific Reports6(1):19205.

Liu Zenghua Peng Qiuling Li Xin,et al,2020.Acoustic emission source localization in steel plate based on time difference mapping method[J].Journal of Applied Basic Scien-ce and Engineering Science28(2):475-485.

Oye V Roth M2003.Automated seismic event location for hydrocarbon reservoirs[J].Computers & Geosciences29(7):851-863.

Shang X Y Tkalčić H2020.Point-source inversion of small and moderate earthquakes from P-wave polarities and P/S amplitude ratios within a hierarchical Bayesian framework:Implications for the Geysers earthquakes[J].Journal of Geo-physical Research:Solid Earth125(2):e2019JB018492

Shang Xueyi,Liu Caiyun,Chen Yong, et al,2021.A location method,system,terminal and readable storage medium of acoustic emission/microseismic event for hole contained structure:CN113552536A [P].2021-10-26[2021-12-13].

Wang Guohua2020.A review of structural damage localization methods based on acoustic emission technology[J].Engineering and Construction34(6):1115-1118.

Xin Weiyao Li Jian Han Yan,et al,2019.Underground source localization method based on adaptive particle swarm optimization[J].Computer System Application28(12):165-170.

Yao Jinjie Han Yan2010.Research on target localization based on particle swarm and Newton iterated algorithm [J].Computer Application Research27(5):1700-1701,1713.

Zhang Hongshan Song Wenzhi Li Qiutao,et al,2016.Analysis of micro-seismicity activity induced by deep orebody mining at Jinqingding gold mine,Shandong Province[J].Gold Science and Technology24(1):76-79.

戴锐,张达,冀虎,等,2019.采空区微震高精度定位方法研究[J].中国矿业28(增2):195-199.

党明智,张君,贾明涛,2020.黄土坡铜锌矿微震监测技术应用与灾害预警方法研究[J].黄金科学技术28(2):246-254.

黄国娇,巴晶,钱卫,2020.层状TI介质中微地震定位和各向异性速度结构同时反演[J].地球物理学报63(7):2846-2857.

姜天琪,裴烁瑾,2019.基于网格搜索—牛顿迭代法的微震震源定位算法[J].矿业科学学报4(6):480-488.

蒋元建,王李管,彭平安,等,2019.基于层状波速模型的矿山微震定位方法[J].有色金属工程9(12):96-105.

李楠,王恩元, Ge Maochen,等,2013.微震震源定位可靠性综合评价模型[J].煤炭学报38(11):1940-1946.

刘增华,彭秋玲,李欣,等,2020.基于时间差映射方法的钢板声发射源定位[J].应用基础与工程科学学报28(2):475-485.

尚雪义,刘彩云,陈勇,等,2021.一种含圆孔结构的声发射/微震事件定位方法、系统、终端及可读存储介质:CN113552536A [P].2021-10-26[2021-12-13].

汪国华,2020.基于声发射技术的结构损伤定位方法综述[J].工程与建设34(6):1115-1118.

辛伟瑶,李剑,韩焱,等,2019.基于自适应粒子群优化算法的地下震源定位方法[J].计算机系统应用28(12):165-170.

姚金杰,韩焱,2010.基于粒子群和牛顿迭代法的目标定位方法研究[J].计算机应用研究27(5):1700-1701,1713.

张洪山,宋文志,李秋涛,等,2016.山东金青顶矿区深部矿体开采诱发微震活动分析[J].黄金科学技术24(1):76-79.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]