img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

  • CN 62-1112/TF 
  • ISSN 1005-2518 
  • 创刊于1988年
高级检索
采选技术与矿山管理

基于相对差异函数的金属矿采空区危险性识别

  • 廖宝泉 ,
  • 柯愈贤 ,
  • 卿琛 ,
  • 张华熙 ,
  • 黄豪琪 ,
  • 方立发 ,
  • 王成 ,
  • 陶铁军
展开
  • 1.江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院,江西 赣州 341000
    2.江西理工大学外语外贸学院,江西 赣州 341000
    3.贵州大学土木工程学院,贵阳 贵州 550025

收稿日期: 2020-08-05

  修回日期: 2020-11-02

  网络出版日期: 2021-07-14

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目“渗流—蠕变耦合作用下全尾砂胶结充填体力学性能演化规律及损伤破坏机制”(51804135);“APAM强化絮网结构后全尾砂料浆流动性能演化机制研究”(51804134);国家大学生创新训练项目“硬岩矿深部膏体充填开采覆岩移动角与移动范围变化规律研究”(201910407004);江西省自然科学基金项目“渗流作用下膏体充填体力学性能演化规律及损伤破坏机制”(20192BAB216017);江西理工大学博士启动基金项目“全尾砂似膏体流变特性与管道输送阻力研究”(jxxjbs17070)

Risk Recognition of Metal Mine Goaf Based on Relative Difference Function

  • Baoquan LIAO ,
  • Yuxian KE ,
  • Chen QING ,
  • Huaxi ZHANG ,
  • Haoqi HUANG ,
  • Lifa FANG ,
  • Cheng WANG ,
  • Tiejun TAO
Expand
  • 1.School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China
    2.Faculty of Foreign Studies,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou 341000,Jiangxi,China
    3.College of Civil Engineering,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,Guizhou,China

Received date: 2020-08-05

  Revised date: 2020-11-02

  Online published: 2021-07-14

摘要

为了经济合理地治理金属矿采空区,建立了相对差异函数的采空区危险性识别模型。首先建立含14个指标的采空区危险性识别指标体系,并采用相对差异函数确定评价指标对评价级别的相对隶属度和熵权法、层次分析法(AHP)确定评价指标的组合权重;然后计算采空区危险性对评价级别的综合相对隶属度和级别特征值;最后根据级别特征值的平均值确定采空区的危险性级别。将该模型运用于某锡矿山8个采空区的危险性评价识别中,确定了各采空区的危险性级别,识别结果与未确知测度理论法识别结果相一致,符合现场实际。研究结果表明:该模型可通过自身参数的4种组合来提高采空区危险性识别结果的可靠性,为采空区危险性识别提供了一种新的方法。

本文引用格式

廖宝泉 , 柯愈贤 , 卿琛 , 张华熙 , 黄豪琪 , 方立发 , 王成 , 陶铁军 . 基于相对差异函数的金属矿采空区危险性识别[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2021 , 29(3) : 440 -448 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2021.03.144

Abstract

Numerous of underground goaf left by metal mine mining not only bring a series of safety and environmental problems to the society,but also affect the development of mineral resources and the healthy and sustainable development of the national economy.The risk recognition of metal mine underground goaf is an important basis of its treatment,so accurately identify the danger of the goaf has become one of the problems to be solved urgently in the safety supervision of government departments and the safety production of mining enterprises.It has been difficult to accurately recognize metal mine underground goaf risk for many factors will influence the stability of underground goaf,and coexistence of quantitative and qualitative factors,and the existence of contradictions between these factors.In order to accurately identify the risk of metal mines underground goaf and manage the goaf economically and rationally,a risk recognition model of metal mine underground goaf based on relative difference function was established.First,a risk recognition index system of metal mine underground goaf containing 14 indexes was constructed according to the risk factors such as hydrogeological factors,goaf parameters,and other factors.Then the relative membership degree of the indexes to evaluation levels was calculated by relative difference function,and the combined weight of the indexes was determined by entropy weight method and analytical hierarchy process.Afterwards,the comprehensive relative membership degree and level characteristic value of metal mine underground goaf risk to different evaluation levels was calculated under four different combinations of distance parameter and optimization criteria parameter,and the level of metal mine underground goaf risk was then to be determined by the average level characteristic value.Furthermore,the whole process was applied to the risk recognition of eight underground goafs a tin mine and their calculated risk level was grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅰ,grade Ⅲ,grade Ⅰ,grade Ⅲ,grade Ⅰ,grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅰ,respectively.The calculation results fully consistent with the recognition results of uncertainty measurement and also well accordant with the practical situation,it also provides a helpful theoretical basis for the mine’s further treatment of underground goaf and safety production.The results show that the above established risk recognition model can self-verify the recognition results by changing its four combinations of its own parameters (distance parameter and optimization criteria parameter),which reflects the model’s overall control over the essential law of the unity and opposites of evaluation indexes.The model can improve the recognized reliability of underground goaf risk and its identification process is simple and efficient,which provides a new method for underground goaf risk recognition.

参考文献

null Chen Guofang,Yu Zhaoxuan,Zhou Pan,2015.Application of improved matter-element extension model to goaf safety evaluation[J].Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering,6(4):91-96.
null Chen Shouyu,2009.Theory and Model of Variable Fuzzy Sets and Its Application[M].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology Press.
null Chen Zhaohui,2018.Safety evaluation of masonry lining tunnels based on relative difference function[J].Journal of East China Jiaotong University,35(4):8-14.
null Cheng Qiuting,Deng Fei,Chen Yanhong,al et,2015.Numerical simulation analysis on the stability of mined-out area[J].Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering,6(2):85-88.
null Deng Gao,Yang Shan,2017.Stability evaluation of goafs based on combined forecasting and variable precision rough fuzzy set[J].Gold Science and Technology,25(3):98-107.
null Dong L J,Peng G J,Fu Y H,al et,2008.Unascertained measurement classifying model of goaf collapse prediction[J].Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China),14(2):221-224.
null Du Kun,Li Xibing,Liu Kewei,al et,2011.Comprehensive evaluation of underground goaf risk and engineering application [J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),42(9):2802-2811.
null FangY H,Zheng X L,Peng H,al et,2019.A new method of the relative membership degree calculation in variable fuzzy sets for water quality assessment[J].Ecological Indicators,98:515-522.
null Fu Yuhua,Xiao Guoxi,2012.Multiple indexes identification model for the prediction of goaf collapse[J].Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering,3(6):61-64.
null Geng Hongbo,Ye Yicheng,2018.Study on goaf risk evaluation based on catastrophe progression method[J].Industrial Minerals & Processing,47(12):26-32.
null Gong Fengqiang,Li Xibing,Dong Longjun,al et,2008.Underground goaf risk evaluation based on uncertainty measurement theory[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,27(2):323-330.
null Hu Hongwang,Ye Yicheng,Geng Hongbo,al et,2018.Study on stability evaluation of layered deposit goaf based on BP neural network [J].Industrial Minerals & Processing,47(3):60-63,69.
null Huang S Z,Chang J X,Leng G Y,al et,2015.Integrated index for drought assessment based on variable fuzzy set theory:A case study in the Yellow River basin,China[J].Journal of Hydrology,527:608-618.
null Huang Yinghua,Wen Lei,Huang Min,al et,2019.Study on fuzzy evaluation system of the complex goaf stability in metal mine[J].Mining Research and Development,39(12):63-67.
null Kong L J,Ma B,2020.Evaluation of environmental impact of construction waste disposal based on fuzzy set analysis[J].Environmental Technology & Innovation,19:100877.
null Ma Haitao,Liu Ningwu,Wang Yunhai,al et,2014.Review on research status of controlling techniques for goaf disaster in metal mine[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,10(10):75-80.
null Qin Y G,Luo Z Q,Wang J,al et,2019.Evaluation of goaf stability based on transfer learning theory of artificial intelligence[J].IEEE Access,7:96912-96925.
null Ren Honggang,Tan Zhuoying,Wang Haijun,2016.Comprehensive evaluation of the multi-attribute goaf treatment methods based on set pair analysis and grey correlation theory[J].Nonferrous Metals (Mining Section),68(2):15-20.
null Ruan Yunkai,Chen Jianping,Shi Mingyuan,al et,2016.Debris flow susceptibility analysis based on relative difference function and game theory[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science),37(12):1800-1804.
null Wang Jipeng,2017.Clustering analysis of hazard correlation factors for mined-out areas based on principal components[J].Industrial Minerals & Processing,46(2):64-68.
null Wang Xinmin,Ke Yuxian,Yan Debo,al et,2012.Underground goaf risk evaluation based on entropy weight and matter element analysis[J].China Safety Science Journal,22(6):71-78.
null Wang Zhao,Guo Jinping,Wang Liguan,2015.Recognition of goaf risk based on support vector machines method [J].Journal of Chongqing University,38(4):85-90,127.
null Wen Tingxin,Sun Hongjuan,Xu Bo,al et,2015.RS-SVM model for predicting underground goaf collapse risk[J].China Safety Science Journal,25(10):16-21.
null Yu Qiang,2019.Evaluation of subway operation safety management based on variable weight and relative difference function[J].Value Engineering,38(3):37-39.
null Zhou J,Li X B,Mitri H S,al et,2013.Identification of large-scale goaf instability in underground mine using particle swarm optimization and support vector machine[J].International Journal of Mining Science & Technology,(5):701-707.
null 陈国芳,于兆绚,周盼,2015.改进物元可拓模型在采空区安全性评价中的应用[J].有色金属科学与工程,6(4):91-96.
null 陈守煜,2009.可变模糊集理论与模型及其应用[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社.
null 陈朝辉,2018.基于相对差异函数的砌石隧道安全性评价[J].华东交通大学学报,35(4):8-14.
null 程秋亭,邓飞,陈艳红,等,2015.采空区稳定性数值模拟分析[J].有色金属科学与工程,6(2):85-88.
null 邓高,杨珊,2017.基于组合预测与变精度粗糙模糊集的采空区稳定性评价[J].黄金科学技术,25(3):98-107.
null 杜坤,李夕兵,刘科伟,等,2011.采空区危险性评价的综合方法及工程应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),42(9):2802-2811.
null 付玉华,肖国喜,2012.采空区塌陷预测的多元识别模型[J].有色金属科学与工程,3(6):61-64.
null 耿宏波,叶义成,2018.基于突变级数法的采空区危险性评价研究[J].化工矿物与加工,47(12):26-32.
null 宫凤强,李夕兵,董陇军,等,2008.基于未确知测度理论的采空区危险性评价研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,27(2):323-330.
null 胡洪旺,叶义成,耿宏波,等,2018.基于BP神经网络的层状矿床采空区稳定性评价研究[J].化工矿物与加工,47(3):60-63,69.
null 黄英华,闻磊,黄敏,等,2019.金属矿山复杂采空区稳定性模糊评价体系研究[J].矿业研究与开发,39(12):63-67.
null 马海涛,刘宁武,王云海,等,2014.金属矿山采空区灾害防治技术研究综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,10(10):75-80.
null 任红岗,谭卓英,王海军,2016.基于集对分析—灰色关联理论的采空区处理多属性方案综合评价[J].有色金属(矿山部分),68(2):15-20.
null 阮云凯,陈剑平,史明远,等,2016.基于相对差异函数和博弈论的泥石流敏感性分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),37(12):1800-1804.
null 王纪鹏,2017.基于主成分的采空区危险性关联因子聚类分析[J].化工矿物与加工,46(2):64-68.
null 王新民,柯愈贤,鄢德波,等,2012.基于熵权法和物元分析的采空区危险性评价研究[J].中国安全科学学报,22(6):71-78.
null 汪朝,郭进平,王李管,2015.采空区危险性的支持向量机识别[J].重庆大学学报,38(4):85-90,127.
null 温廷新,孙红娟,徐波,等,2015.矿区采空塌陷危险性预测的RS-SVM模型[J].中国安全科学学报,25(10):16-21.
null 尉强,2019.基于变权和相对差异函数的地铁运营安全管理评价[J].价值工程,38(3):37-39.
文章导航

/