[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
王牧帆(1995-),男,湖南岳阳人,硕士研究生,从事矿山安全技术研究工作。495749247@qq.com |
收稿日期: 2020-02-29
修回日期: 2020-06-11
网络出版日期: 2021-01-29
基金资助
国家“十三五”重点研发计划项目“深部大矿段多采区时空协同连续采矿理论与技术”(2017YFC0602901)
Stability Prediction of Goaf Based on Stacking Model
Received date: 2020-02-29
Revised date: 2020-06-11
Online published: 2021-01-29
为了预防采空区安全事故的发生,提高采空区稳定性预测的准确性,选取了影响采空区稳定性的11个主要因素作为特征值,建立了以Random Frost、Adaboost、ExtraTrees和LightGBM为初级学习器,Logistic-Regression为次级学习器的Stacking模型,对采空区稳定性进行预测。将从实际矿山获取的 60 组数据拆分成训练集与测试集对Stacking 模型进行训练学习,同时对比单模型与 Stacking 模型的预测结果。使用F1值与AUC值对模型进行评价,Stacking模型F1值为0.967,AUC值为0.97,远高于Random Frost等传统单一机器学习模型。对于未放入模型训练的测试集数据,Stacking模型的预测准确度也优于Random Frost等传统单一机器学习模型。结果表明:Stacking 模型相比单模型的机器学习方法能够更加精准有效地预测采空区的稳定性等级。
王牧帆 , 罗周全 , 于琦 . 基于 Stacking 模型的采空区稳定性预测[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020 , 28(6) : 894 -901 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.06.049
In the process of mining,the mining technology mainly based on the open field method will leave a large number of goaves after mining,which has great safety risks.Therefore,the prediction of the stability of the goaf is particularly important.In recent years,with the advent of the era of big data,machine learning and deep learning technology has been introduced into the mining industry.More and more scholars begin to use the prediction method of machine learning to study the stability of goaf.It is found that every single machine term model has its scope of use and scene,when facing a new goaf problem,we can not immediately give the most effective model to adapt to it.At this time,the stacking method derived from integrated learning is born.This article is mainly divided into three parts.The first part mainly introduces the Stacking method,explains the main steps of the method and the choice of the learner.Stacking is generally a two-layer structure.The first layer is composed of various elementary learners.Input the original data set to train them.The second layer uses the output of these primary learners as a new data set and new features into the secondary learner (meta-learner) for training,to complete the stack fusion of the model.The Stacking model requires that the correlation between the primary learners should be as small as possible,and the performance difference between the primary learners should not be too large.The second-level learner should choose a simpler learner.The second part is the construction of Stacking model.This paper selected eleven factors affecting the stability of mined-out area,they are the rock mass structure (X 1),geological structure(X 2),groundwater (X 3),goaf engineering layout (X 4),mining perturbation(X 5),adjacent cavity (X 6),the volume of the goaf (X 7),the exposed area of goaf roof (X 8),buried depth (X 9),goaf span mined-out area ratio (X 10),rock compressive strength(X 11).By using the eleven dimensional data and the classification of goaf stability as training data,we put them into the stacking model with random frost,AdaBoost,extratrees and lightgbm as primary learners and logistic regression as secondary learners for training.Another part of the training data was used as test data to compare the performance of stacking model and single machine learning model.The experimental results show that the F1 and AUC of stacking model are 0.967 and 0.97 respectively.Far higher than all other single machine learning models.The stacking model is better than other single machine learning models and show stronger generalization ability.Therefore,as the third part,it is concluded that the stacking model can predict the stability of goaf better than the single machine learning model.
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2020/1005-2518/1005-2518-2020-28-6-894.shtml
| 1 |
冯远建,李子龙.矿山采空区稳定性分析及安全治理方法研究[J].煤炭与化工,2014,37(6):28-30.
|
| 2 |
晁军,雷醒民,樊育豪.三维有限元数值模拟在采空区稳定性评价中的应用[J].工程建设与设计,2018(23):15-18.
|
| 3 |
杨宁,尹贤刚,钟勇,等.基于3DMine-FLAC3D的复杂空区稳定性分析[J].化工矿物与加工,2019(4):22-24,28.
|
| 4 |
邓岁伟,冯锐,赵铭久.基于ANSYS的采空区稳定性数值模拟分析[J].采矿技术,2018,18(1):34-37.
|
| 5 |
季惠龙,侯克鹏,张成良,等.大型采空区顶板冒落危害预测[J].采矿技术,2010,10(2):50-52,76.
|
| 6 |
曾令义,潘冬.崩落法转充填法隔离层安全厚度的确定[J].矿冶工程,2015,35(4):17-20.
|
| 7 |
张慧生,顾伟.典型曲线法在山东龙口软岩煤矿区开采沉陷预测中的应用[J].地质找矿论丛,2014,29(1):84-90.
|
| 8 |
许章平,栾元重,相涛,等.基于概率积分法和Kalman滤波模型的矿区变形预测[J].煤炭技术,2018,37(12):111-114.
|
| 9 |
孟东芳,唐皓,童锋.基于突变级数法的岩体质量评价[J].中国煤炭地质,2018,30(10):64-69.
|
| 10 |
王海峰,李夕兵,董陇军,等.基于支持向量机的采空区稳定性分级[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(10):154-159.
|
| 11 |
黄新典,褚夫蛟.基于逻辑回归-聚类算法的采空区危险等级评价模型[J].金属矿山,2019,48(8):179-184.
|
| 12 |
李孜军,林武清,陈阳.基于AGA-BP神经网络的采空区危险性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(7):135- 141.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
李岩,赵建文.基于PCA-SVM 的采空区危险性评价[J].河北冶金,2014(11):72-77.
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
陈怀利.基于盲数理论的采空区危险性评价模型[J].采矿技术,2019,19(3):43-46.
|
| 21 |
赵超,马俊超,万黎明,等.基于层次可拓分析法的采空区塌陷危险性评价研究[J].安全与环境工程,2016,23(6):35-40.
|
| 22 |
汪朝,郭进平,王李管.采空区危险性的支持向量机识别[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2015,38(4):85-90.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |