[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
李泽佑(1996-),男,山东聊城人,硕士研究生,从事高寒高海拔矿井通风除尘与应急技术研究工作。1277136677@qq.com |
收稿日期: 2020-03-30
修回日期: 2020-05-25
网络出版日期: 2020-11-05
基金资助
国家“十三五”重点研发计划项目“高海拔高寒地区矿山人机功效与应急救援技术”(2018YFC0808406)
中南大学研究生自主探索创新项目“高海拔矿山掘进巷道通风降尘方法优选及粉尘运移规律研究”(2020zzts720)
Ventilation Method Optimization of Dust Extraction in an Excavation Roadway of High-altitude Mine
Received date: 2020-03-30
Revised date: 2020-05-25
Online published: 2020-11-05
为优选高海拔矿山独头巷道通风降尘方法,研究粉尘颗粒扩散和分布规律,以云南迪庆普朗矿海拔3 700 m的一条独头巷道为研究对象,利用Fluent软件进行数值模拟研究。建立基于长压短抽、长抽短压和压入式通风方法的6种通风方案模型,对6种方案的风流场、粉尘颗粒分布情况以及呼吸面粉尘颗粒浓度进行分析和比较,并选择压风口与掘进面的距离和风筒中心点与地面的距离2个参数对压入式通风除尘系统的压入风筒位置进行优化。对最佳方案的粉尘颗粒质量浓度及粉尘运移规律进行分析,并与相同通风条件下的平原矿山独头巷道进行对比。研究结果表明:对于该高海拔矿山独头巷道,选择压入式通风方法,压入风筒布置在巷道正中央正上方位置,且压风口与掘进面的距离Z=1.3 、风筒中心点与地面的距离L=5D时,通风降尘效果最理想;在压入式通风条件下,高海拔矿山除尘效率优于平原矿山。
李泽佑 , 黄锐 , 赵淑琪 , 沈学 , 吴娥 . 高海拔矿山独头巷道通风降尘方法优选[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020 , 28(5) : 743 -752 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.05.065
With the implementation of the grand western development program,a number of mines located at high altitude have appeared in China,where the special environmental factors of low air pressure and low temperature have brought challenge to the dust extraction work of the mines.The large amount of productive dust will cause serious damage to human respiratory system and is one of the main threats to the health of mine workers.The working face of the excavation roadway is one of the largest productive dust sources in underground mining operation.Therefore,it is of great engineering value and theoretical significance to study the dust extraction method of excavation roadway in high-altitude mine.In order to optimize the ventilation method of dust extraction in an excavation roadway of high-altitude mine and study the law of dust particle diffusion and distribution,the numerical simulation was conducted with computational fluid dynamics software Fluent and an excavation roadway (with section shape of three centered arch) at an altitude of 3 700 m in Pulang mine was taken as research object.The Lagrange discrete phase model was selected to calculate the gas-solid flow,which allows the exchange of momentum,mass and energy between continuous phase and discrete phase but ignores the interaction between particles.Through analyzing six different ventilation scheme models about far-forcing-near-exhausting(FFNE),near-forcing-far-exhausting(NFFE) and pure forcing(PF) established in this paper,the airflow field,dust particle distribution and respiratory zone dust particle concentration of them were analyzed and compared to optimize the better ventilation method.The distance between the pressure vent and the heading face and the distance between the center of the air duct and the ground were set as parameters to optimize the position of the air duct of the blowing ventilation.The mass concentration of dust particles and the law of dust particle diffusion in the selected plan were analyzed and compared with the excavation roadway in plain mine under the same ventilation condition.The following conclusions can be drawn:For the excavation roadway at an altitude of 3 700 m in Pulang mine,the best solution for dust extraction is using blowing ventilation scheme where the air duct is arranged in the position directly above the center of the roadway,while the distance between the pressure vent and the heading face is set to 16 m, and the distance between the center of the air duct and the ground is set to 3 m.The sedimentation of dust particles makes the mass concentration of dust particles is high at the bottom of the roadway and low at the top of the roadway.The mass concentration of dust particles at the cross section of the roadway (1 m,5 m,10 m,20 m,30 m) increases first and then decreases.The occurrence point of the maximum value of the dust particle mass concentration moves away from the working face with time,and its value generally decreases.Under the same ventilation condition,the dust extraction efficiency of high altitude mine is better than that of plain mine.
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2020/1005-2518/1005-2518-2020-28-5-743.shtml
| 1 |
庞杰文,谢建林,卢国菊,等.长抽短压通风下综掘工作面粉尘分布特征研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2017,45(10):76-81,134.
|
| 2 |
聂文,马骁,程卫民,等.通风条件影响长压短抽掘进面粉尘扩散的仿真实验[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(9):3346-3353.
|
| 3 |
王晓珍.煤巷掘进过程中粉尘浓度影响因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):75-79.
|
| 4 |
龚剑,胡乃联,林荣汉,等.掘进巷道压入式通风粉尘运移规律数值模拟[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2015,67(1):65-68.
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
周智勇,胡培,韩章程,等.掘进工作面通风布置对粉尘分布规律的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(9):2264-2271.
|
| 10 |
胡方坤,时国庆,张义坤,等.基于非稳态DPM模拟研究长压短抽式掘进面粉尘运移规律[J].中国煤炭,2013,39(12):104-108.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
王孝东.高海拔金属矿山矿井通风系统研究[D].北京:北京科技大学,2015.
|
| 13 |
龚剑,胡乃联,崔翔,等.高海拔矿山掘进通风方式优选[J].科技导报,2015,33(4):56-60.
|
| 14 |
钟华,胡乃联,李国清,等.基于Fluent的高海拔矿山掘进工作面增氧通风技术研究[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(1):81-185.
|
| 15 |
何磊.高原矿山独头巷道增氧通风数值模拟研究[J].现代矿业,2011(2):37-40.
|
| 16 |
李蓉蓉,李孜军,赵淑琪,等.基于CFD的高海拔矿山掘进面通风增氧方案优化[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(2):54-60.
|
| 17 |
刘子龙,杨洪英,佟琳琳,等.高海拔环境下氧化铜矿浮选优化试验研究[J].黄金科学技术,2019,27(4):589-597.
|
| 18 |
龚剑,胡乃联,林荣汉,等.高海拔矿山掘进面长压短抽式通风粉尘分布数值模拟[J].金属矿山,2014,43(12):203-208.
|
| 19 |
张德存.三心拱主要几何参数间系数值的理论修正[J].铀矿冶,2018,37(2):112-115.
|
| 20 |
程卫民.矿井通风与安全[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2016.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会.金属非金属矿山安全规程:GB16423-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China,
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |