[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
采选技术与矿山管理

基于EEMD和关联维数的矿山微震信号特征提取和分类

  • 廖智勤 , 1, 2 ,
  • 王李管 , 1, 2 ,
  • 何正祥 1, 2
展开
  • 1. 中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 2. 中南大学数字矿山研究中心,湖南 长沙 410083
王李管(1964-),男,山西乡宁人,教授,从事数字矿山方面的研究工作。

廖智勤(1995-),男,湖南浏阳人,硕士研究生,从事矿山微震监测研究工作。

收稿日期: 2019-11-19

  修回日期: 2020-05-04

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-27

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目“深部金属矿集约化连续采矿理论与技术”(2017YFC0602905)

Feature Extraction and Classification of Mine Microseismic Signals Based on EEMD and Correlation Dimension

  • Zhiqin LIAO , 1, 2 ,
  • Liguan WANG , 1, 2 ,
  • Zhengxiang HE 1, 2
Expand
  • 1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China
  • 2. Digital Mine Research Center,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China

Received date: 2019-11-19

  Revised date: 2020-05-04

  Online published: 2020-08-27

本文亮点

针对岩体工程中岩体破裂信号与爆破振动信号难以自动区分的问题,提出了一种基于集合经验模态分解(EEMD)关联维数与机器学习相结合的微震信号特征提取和分类方法。利用EEMD将微震信号分解为本征模态函数(IMF)分量,并从得到的IMF分量中筛选出主分量IMF1~IMF4,再通过相空间重构计算出各个主分量的关联维数,最后将所得到的关联维数作为特征向量,使用SVM方法进行微震信号自动识别,并与其他机器学习方法进行对比分析。试验结果表明:该方法对微震信号的自动识别具有较高的准确率,且基于高斯核函数的SVM的识别效果明显优于逻辑回归(LR)和K-近邻算法(KNN)判别法的识别结果,其准确率达到93.7%。

本文引用格式

廖智勤 , 王李管 , 何正祥 . 基于EEMD和关联维数的矿山微震信号特征提取和分类[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020 , 28(4) : 585 -594 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.04.188

Highlights

The microseismic monitoring technique is to evaluate the failure and safety of rock mass indirectly by monitoring the vibration signal caused by the rupture inside the rock mass,and it can provide guidance for ground pressure disaster warning and safety production optimization.In order to accurately analyze the behavior of rock rupture,it is necessary to eliminate the interference of non-microscopic signal.At present,microseismic monitoring system can not recognize microseismic signal automatically.The core problem is that the vibration signal is complex,the waveform characteristic is not obvious,the noise is large and multi-seismic superposition occurs.In order to solve the problem that it is difficult to distinguish the rock burst signals and the blasting vibration signals automatically,a method of feature extraction and classification of microseismic signals based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition(EEMD),correlation dimension and machine learning was pro-posed.Firstly,the microseismic signals was decomposed into Intrinsic Mode Function(IMF) components by EEMD,and the principal components IMF1~IMF4 were selected from the obtained IMF components,the IMF1~IMF4 component was selected as the main component for phase space reconstruction.The delay time and minimum embedding dimension of each component were obtained by autocorrelation function method and Cao algorithm.Then,accoring to the obtained delay time and embedding dimension,the correlation integral curve of IMF1~IMF4 components was obtained by using the G-P algorithm,and the region with the best linearity of the correlation integral curve was found.The integral curve was fitted by least squares,and the resulting linear slope value was taken as the correlation dimension value,and the obtained correlation dimension was taken as the feature vector for microseismic signal recognition..Finally,the SVM method was used to automatically identify the microseismic signals and compare them with other machine learning methods.The experimental results show that the method has a high accuracy for automatic recognition of microseismic signals.The recognition effect of SVM based on Gaussian kernel function is obviously better than the recognition result of Logical Regression(LR) and K-Nearest Neighbor(KNN) discriminant method.The classification accuracy of gaussian kernel function SVM based on EEMD correlation dimension is 93.7%.Based on the analysis,it is found that the recognition effect SVM different kernel functions is different.The recognition effect of Gaussian kernel function SVM is better than that of linear kernel function SVM and Sigmoid kernel function SVM.Therefore,the feature extraction and classification method based on EEMD correlation dimension and SVM provides a feasible new method for mine microseismic signal classification.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

山东省重大研发计划“深部金矿资源评价理论、方法与预测”通过综合绩效评价

2020年8月15日,由山东省地质矿产勘查开发局第六地质大队组织实施的山东省重大研发计划“深部金矿资源评价理论、方法与预测”项目以优异成绩通过了山东省科技厅组织的综合绩效评价暨科技成果鉴定。省科技厅社会发展科技处二级调研员王胜利主持绩效评价暨科技成果鉴定会议,省地矿局党委常委、副局长徐军祥出席会议并致辞,局总工程师兼科技与国际合作处处长丁正江等参加会议。

评审组由中国工程院院士陈毓川、毛景文、林君,中国地质大学(北京)二级教授邓军、中国地质学会二级研究员郝梓国、中国地质科学院二级研究员肖克炎、自然资源部矿产勘查技术指导中心研究员吕志成、中国地质大学(北京)教授陈建平等11位知名专家组成。在听取汇报并进行资料查验、质询及讨论后,评审组一致认为项目在金矿成矿理论和深部探矿技术方法上取得了重大进展,深化发展了胶东金矿成矿理论,破解了制约深部找矿的关键技术难题,项目研发和形成的2 000 m以浅、2 000~5 000 m深度和阶梯式金矿找矿、多尺度三维建模技术方法达到了国际领先水平,对指导区域乃至全国金矿勘查工作具有重要的现实意义和深远的战略影响。

“深部金矿资源评价理论、方法与预测”项目属于2017年山东省重大研发计划,由山东省地质矿产勘查开发局第六地质大队组织实施,山东理工大学、山东省物化探勘查院共同参与完成。通过3年工作研究,在胶东地区首次发现白垩纪高镁闪长岩、元古宙洋岛型和洋中脊型基性岩残片等地质单元,厘定了白垩纪地壳快速隆升事件,建立了热隆—伸展构造模式;建立了破碎带蚀变岩型金矿、石英脉型金矿、胶东金矿和深部金矿成矿模式;突破深部找矿技术瓶颈,建立了适用2 000 m以浅和2 000~5 000 m深度的找矿技术方法组合,构建了多指标、多尺度三维地质模型。项目研发的深部找矿技术方法攻克了深部勘查技术难题,已经广泛应用于深部找矿领域,为胶东地区深部找矿取得具有世界级影响的重大突破提供了理论和技术支撑。

(来源:威海晚报)

http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2020/1005-2518/1005-2518-2020-28-4-585.shtml

1
李庶林,尹贤刚,郑文达,等.凡口铅锌矿多通道微震监测系统及其应用研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报2005,24(12):2048-2053.

Li Shulin Yin Xiangang Zheng Wenda,et al.Research of multi-channel microseismic monitoring system and its application to Fankou lead-zinc mine[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2005,24(12):2048-2053.

2
Yang C X Luo Z Q Hu G B,et al.Application of a microseismic monitoring system in deep mining[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing200714(1):6-8.

3
唐绍辉,潘懿,黄英华,等.深井矿山地压灾害微震监测技术应用研究 [J].岩石力学与工程学报200928(增2):3597-3603.

Tang Shaohui Pan Yi Huang Yinghua,et al.Application research of microseismic monitoring technology to geos-tress hazards in deep mining[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,200928(Supp.2):3597-3603.

4
Peng P A He Z X Wang L G,et al.Automatic classification of microseismic signals based on MFCC and GMM-HMM in underground mines[J].Shock and Vibration2019:1-9.

5
Peng P A He Z X Wang L G,et al.Automatic classification of microseismic records in underground mining:A deep learning approach[J].IEEE Access2020178:63-76.

6
姜福兴,尹永明,朱权洁,等.单事件多通道微震波形的特征提取与联合识别研究 [J].煤炭学报201439(2):229-237.

Jiang Fuxing Yin Yongming Zhu Quanjie,et al.Feature eatraction and classification of mining microseismic waveforms via multi-channels analysis[J].Journal of China Coal Society,201439(2):229-237.

7
Vallejos J A Mckinnon S D.Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences201362(9):86-95.

8
Malovichko D.Discrimination of blasts in mine seismology[J].Proceeding of the Deep Mining201235(2):85-94.

9
Kuyuk H S Yildirim E Dogan E,et al.Clustering seismic activities using linear and nonlinear discriminant analysis [J].Journal of Earth Science201425(1):140-145.

10
曹安业,窦林名,秦玉红,等.高应力区微震监测信号特征分析[J].采矿与安全工程学报200724(2):146-149.

Cao Anye Dou Linming Qin Yuhong,et al.Characteristic of microseismic monitoring signal in high stressed zone[J].Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering,200724(2):146-149.

11
陆菜平,窦林名,吴兴荣,等.岩体微震监测的频谱分析与信号识别[J].岩土工程学报200527(7):772-775.

Lu Caiping Dou Linming Wu Xingrong,et al.Frequency spectrum analysis on microseismic monitoring and signal differentiation of rock material[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,200527(7):772-775.

12
朱权洁,姜福兴,于正兴,等.爆破震动与岩石破裂微震信号能量分布特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报201231(4):723-730.

Zhu Quanjie Jiang Fuxing Yu Zhengxing,et al.Study on energy distribution characters about blasting vibration and rock fracture microseismic signal[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,201231(4):723-730.

13
赵国彦,邓青林,马举.基于FSWT时频分析的矿山微震信号分析与识别 [J].岩土工程学报201537(2):306-312.

Zhao Guoyan Deng Qinglin Ma Ju.Recognition of mine microseismic signals based on FSWT time-frequency analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,201537(2):306-312.

14
赵国彦,邓青林.基于LCD分解的微震信号分析与识别 [J].科技导报201432(27):49-55.

Zhao Guoyan Deng Qinglin.Analysis and differentiation of microseismic signal based on LCD decomposition[J].Science and Technology Review,201432(27):49-55.

15
李伟.基于LMD和模式识别的矿山微震信号特征提取及分类方法 [J].煤炭学报201742(5):1156-1164.

Li Wei.Feature extraction and classification method of mine microseismic signals based on LMD and pattern recognition[J].Journal of China Coal Society,201742(5):1156-1164.

16
尚雪义,李夕兵,彭康,等.基于EMD_SVD的矿山微震与爆破信号特征提取及分类方法 [J].岩土工程学报201638(10):1849-1858.

Shang Xueyi Li Xibing Peng Kang,et al.Feature extraction and classification of mine microseismic and blast based on EMD_SVD[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,201638(10):1849-1858.

17
Grassberger P P I.Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors[J].Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena19839(1):189-208.

18
刘深,张小蓟,牛奕龙,等.基于IMF能量谱的水声信号特征提取与分类[J].计算机工程与应用201450(3):203-206.

Liu Shen Zhang Xiaoji Niu Yilong,et al.Feature extraction and classification experiment of underwater acoustic signals based on energy spectrum of IMF’s[J].Computer Engineering and Applications,201450(3):203-206.

19
Takens F.Detecting strange attractors in turbulence[J].Lecture Notes in Mathematics Berlin Springer Verlag1981898:366-381.

20
李琳,张永祥,明廷涛.EMD降噪的关联维数在齿轮故障诊断中的应用研究[J].振动与冲击200928(4):145-148.

Li Lin Zhang Yongxiang Ming Tingtao.Application research of correlation dimension of EMD noise reduction in gear fault diagnosis[J].Journal of Vibration and Sho-ck,200928(4):145-148.

21
Packard N Crutchfield J Farmer D.Geometry from a time series[J].Physical Review Letters1980712(45):712.

22
徐海祥.基于支持向量机方法的图像分割与目标分类[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2005.

Xu Haixiang.Image Segmentation and Object Classification Based on Support Vector Machines[D].Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology,2005.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]