[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
许瑞(1995-),女,山西晋中人,硕士研究生,从事深部地下工程灾害防治研究工作。safetyxurui@csu.edu.cn |
收稿日期: 2019-12-25
修回日期: 2020-04-22
网络出版日期: 2020-08-27
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目“开采扰动下深部工程结构的动态响应机理”(11972378)
“考虑非平稳、强噪声信号到时差拾取的硬岩矿山微震定位方法研究”(51904335)
Combined Prediction Model of Rockburst Intensity Based on Kernel Principal Component Analysis and SVM
Received date: 2019-12-25
Revised date: 2020-04-22
Online published: 2020-08-27
为了更好地预测岩土工程中的岩爆烈度,建立了基于多类型核函数的主成分分析方法与遗传算法或粒子群优化算法(GA/PSO)优化的支持向量机(SVM)相结合的组合预测模型。选取围岩最大切向应力 、岩石单轴抗拉强度 、岩石单轴抗压强度 、应力集中系数 、脆性指数 和 以及弹性应变能指数 共7个指标构成岩爆预测指标体系。基于统计的246个国内外岩爆实例数据,分别运用主成分分析和基于线性核函数、RBF核函数以及MLP核函数的主成分分析对数据进行预处理,得到2~4个线性无关的主成分。再将降维后的数据输入GA/PSO优化的SVM模型进行训练和预测。经测试,基于RBF核函数的主成分分析方法与PSO-SVM相结合的模型预测准确率达到了92.3%,为最佳组合模型,为岩土工程中的岩爆烈度预测提供了一种可靠的方法。
许瑞 , 侯奎奎 , 王玺 , 刘兴全 , 李夕兵 . 基于核主成分分析与SVM的岩爆烈度组合预测模型[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020 , 28(4) : 575 -584 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.04.019
Rockburst is a relatively dangerous engineering geological disaster in underground hard rock engineering constructed in high geostress area.Due to the re-distribution of the stress in surrounding rocks during the excavation of underground engineering,the elastic strain energy is released suddenly and abruptly,causing rock fragments to eject from the rock.And then,the casualties and equipment damage are often happened,which make the rockburst become one of the worldwide difficulties in underground engineering.Therefore,the prediction of possibility of rockburst and its intensity is a problem that must be solved in underground engineering construction.For predicting rock-burst intensity effectively,a combined prediction model based on kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) of multiple types and the support vector machine (SVM) optimized by genetic algorithm or particle swarm optimization algorithm (GA/PSO) was established.According to the characteristics and causes of rockburst,rocks’ maximum tangential stress ,rocks’ uniaxial compressive strength ,rocks’ uniaxial tensile strength ,stress concentration coefficient ,rock brittleness coefficient and ,and elastic energy index were chosen to form the rockburst prediction indexes system.Based on 246 groups of typical rockburst cases at home and abroad,the data were preprocessed through the principal component analysis and the principal component analysis based on linear kernel function,radial basis function (RBF) kernel function and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) kernel function.On the basis of ensuring the amount of information in the original data,2 to 4 linearly independent principal components are obtained,which reduces the correlation between the indicators and the input parameters of the SVM model,and simplifies the training process.Then input the dimensionality-reduced data into GA/PSO optimized SVM model for training and prediction.To improve classification accuracy and generalization ability of the SVM,GA/PSO were adopted to automatically determine the parameters for support vector machine,and the optimal values of parameters and were determined by the method of 10 fold cross validation,which avoided the blindness of manually providing parameters.In this study,220 rockburst samples were randomly selected as the training set,and the remaining 26 samples were selected as the test set.After testing,the optimal parameters,the training set and test set accuracy of the 8 combined models were obtained.The prediction accuracy of the model based on the combination of the principal component analysis method of RBF kernel function and PSO-SVM reached 92.3%,which was the optimal combination model.It demonstrated that the combined prediction model can accurately deal with the complex non-linear relationship between various factors affecting the rockburst intensity,and the model has strong engineering practicability in the prediction of rockburst intensity.
http://www.goldsci.ac.cn/article/2020/1005-2518/1005-2518-2020-28-4-575.shtml
| 1 |
李夕兵.岩石动力学基础与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
|
| 2 |
王元汉,李卧东,李启光,等.岩爆预测的模糊数学综合评判方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(5):493-501.
|
| 3 |
李夕兵,宫凤强,王少锋,等.深部硬岩矿山岩爆的动静组合加载力学机制与动力判据[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(4):708-723.
|
| 4 |
宫凤强,李夕兵.岩爆发生和烈度分级预测的距离判别方法及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(5):1012-1018.
|
| 5 |
赵洪波.岩爆分类的支持向量机方法[J].岩土力学,2005,26(4):642-644.
|
| 6 |
白明洲,王连俊,许兆义.岩爆危险性预测的神经网络模型及应用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2002,12(4):65-69.
|
| 7 |
高玮.基于蚁群聚类算法的岩爆预测研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(6):874-880.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
邱道宏,李术才,张乐文,等.基于模型可靠性检查的QGA-SVM岩爆倾向性分类研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(5):981-991.
|
| 10 |
贾义鹏,吕庆,尚岳全.基于粒子群算法和广义回归神经网络的岩爆预测[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(2):344-348.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
吴顺川,张晨曦,成子桥.基于PCA-PNN原理的岩爆烈度分级预测方法[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(9):2767-2776.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
赵国彦,刘雷磊,王剑波,等.岩爆等级预测的PCA-OPF模型[J].矿冶工程,2019,39(4):1-5.
|
| 15 |
辛焕平.MATLAB R2017a模式识别与智能计算[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2018.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
冯夏庭,赵洪波.岩爆预测的支持向量机[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2002,23(1):57-59.
|
| 18 |
陈晋音,熊晖,郑海斌.基于粒子群算法的支持向量机的参数优化[J].计算机科学,2018,45(6):197-203.
|
| 19 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |