[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
刘锋(1989-),男,山东临沂人,博士,从事地质工程和岩石力学研究工作。liufengkj@sd-gold.com |
收稿日期: 2018-07-24
修回日期: 2018-12-10
网络出版日期: 2019-07-09
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目“海底采矿对地质环境的胁迫影响与致灾机理”(编号:41831293)、“金属矿山地下采动引起的竖井变形破坏机理研究”(41772341)
Current Situation and Prospect of Destressing Techniques in Deep Mine
Received date: 2018-07-24
Revised date: 2018-12-10
Online published: 2019-07-09
随着国内外矿山进入深部开采阶段,高应力特征显现,岩爆、冲击地压等地质灾害频发,增加了深部矿产资源开采的难度。卸压技术能够有效解决矿山深部局部高应力集中并防治矿山动力地质灾害,因而受到国内外学者的广泛关注。通过梳理国内外卸压技术研究现状,归纳总结了主要卸压技术(包括水力卸压、钻孔卸压、卸压槽/卸压巷道和爆破卸压等)及常用的研究手段(相似材料模拟和数值模拟),对比分析了各类卸压技术的优缺点。结合当前金属矿山深部开采的实际需求,提出未来卸压技术理论研究的若干重要方向:(1)深化理论研究,通过经验公式来确定合理的卸压参数,从而指导生产实践;(2)相比其他卸压技术,爆破卸压的应用前景广阔,同时多种卸压方法相结合是未来深部矿山开采的有效措施;(3)数值模拟在卸压技术及参数确定方面的优势显著,未来卸压技术研究应充分了解现场复杂地质条件,结合相似模拟、数值模拟与现场试验,提出一套适用于金属矿山深部开采实际的卸压技术方案。
刘锋 , 王昭坤 , 马凤山 , 王波 , 王剑波 , 董春蕾 . 矿山深部卸压技术研究现状及展望[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2019 , 27(3) : 425 -432 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2019.03.425
Presently,the mines in domestic and foreign had been on the stage of deep mining.The high ground stress characteristics emerged and frequent dynamic geological hazards of mines happened,such as rock burst,which increased the difficulty of mining deep mineral resources.The rock bolt,anchor-mesh and other hard support which were used in shallow mines cannot achieve ideal governance effect,at the same time repair rate and maintenance cost was also high.Hence,it was imperative to carry out the study of deep mine destressing technology.This paper mainly introduced the destressing theory and destressing technology,summarized the current main destressing methods at home and abroad,and revealed the advantages and disadvantages of existing destressing methods.On this basis,some suggestions were put forward for the research methods and future research direction of destressing technology.Destress is one of the most effective ways to solve the high ground stress concentration in the deep part of the mine.Its basic principle was to improve the stress and energy release in the local surrounding rock by certain technical means,reduced the stress and energy concentration and the possibility of the instability of the deep rock mass.At present,the main destressing technologies at home and abroad include hydraulic destressing,borehole destressing,excavation destressing groove or destressing roadway and blasting destressing.The advantage of hydraulic destressing lied in increasing pore water pressure of rock mass and reducing effective stress and shear strength of rock mass,which was conducive to rock fracture expansion.However,the water injection pressure was relatively small,so good destressing effect cannot be achieved in hard rock area.The design of borehole destressing took fewer parameters into consideration and the parameters can be easily determined.However,the destressing of boreholes has a small range of influence.To achieve the desired effect of destressing,the number of boreholes was large,the construction time was long,and the construction schedule was also affected.The destressing groove or destressing roadway shall be determined in the direction of excavation and the distance from the high stress area.When the distance was too large,the destressing effect cannot be achieved.When the distance was too small,the size of destressing groove or destressing roadway was larger,which will lead to more obvious fracture and deformation of rock mass and is not conducive to rock mass stability.The blasting destressing process was simple,the effect was good,and the disturbance to the shallow surrounding rock was small.However,there were few studies on the mechanism of rock mass disturbance at present,and it was difficult to determine the influence range of blasting destressing pressure.The determination of reasonable and feasible destressing methods and parameters was the precondition and foundation for the field destressing. Similar material simulation and numerical simulation are the main methods for the research of destressing methods and parameters.The physical simulation can basically satisfy the similarity of geometric shape and mechanical parameters,but cannot achieve the simulation of factors such as ground stress,pore water pressure and structural surface,resulting in the deviation of the simulation results.The numerical simulation was relatively convenient and intuitive,and can simulate any mine engineering activities,which was widely used in determining the optimal parameters.Therefore,the main research direction of future pressure relief technology was to use numerical simulation method and combine various destressing methods to deal with complex geological conditions.
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
姜耀东,赵毅鑫 .我国煤矿冲击地压的研究现状:机制、预警与控制[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(11):2188-2204.
|
| 4 |
潘俊锋,毛德兵,蓝航,等 .我国煤矿冲击地压防治技术研究现状及展望[J].煤炭科学技术,2013,41(6):21-25,41.
|
| 5 |
任清平,陈从新,谷志孟 .散粒体矿山巷道围岩的变形规律规律研究[J].岩土力学,2003,24(4):522-527.
|
| 6 |
朱志成,赵奎,王晓军,等 .某铅锌矿岩石流变特性分析[J].现代矿业,2017(10):79-82.
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
王御宇,李学锋,李向东 .深部高应力卸压开采研究[J].矿冶工程,2005,25(4):4-7.
|
| 13 |
谢柚生 .深部金属矿山卸压开采研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2012.
|
| 14 |
王凯,郭灵强,俞启香,等 .综采工作面水力超前卸压防突数值模拟与试验研究[J].煤炭学报,2007,32(8):832-837.
|
| 15 |
李昌发 .解除矿山冲击的卸压技术[J].采矿与安全工程学报,1993(2):70-72.
|
| 16 |
范育青,朱栋,汪华君,等 .煤体集中应力区注水卸压技术研究[J].中国矿业,2012,21(8): 86-90.
|
| 17 |
杨增强,窦林名,刘畅,等 .深井巷帮煤体冲击机理及水射流卸压技术应用[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2017,34(4):670-678.
|
| 18 |
王猛,王襄禹,肖同强 .深部巷道钻孔卸压机理及关键参数确定方法与应用[J].煤炭学报,2017,42(5):1138-1145.
|
| 19 |
李永和 .开孔卸压与锚杆加固联合支护的边界元分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1988,7(3):237-247.
|
| 20 |
贾传洋,蒋宇静,张学朋,等 .大直径钻孔卸压机理室内及数值试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2017,39(6):1115-1122.
|
| 21 |
王悦汉,陆士良,李洪运 .顶部卸压法维护软岩硐室[J].矿山压力与顶板管理,1992(2): 4-8.
|
| 22 |
刘斌,侯大德,孙国权 .高地应力巷道卸压控制技术ABAQUS模拟[J].金属矿山,2015,44(11):45-50.
|
| 23 |
蒋金泉,韩继胜,徐方军 .倾斜地层大深度硐室群顶部卸压保护机理与效应[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(增):1209-1213.
|
| 24 |
李学华,黄志增,杨宏敏,等 .高应力硐室底鼓控制的应力转移技术[J].中国矿业大学学报,2006,35(3):296-300.
|
| 25 |
王襄禹,柏建彪,李伟 .高应力软岩巷道全断面松动卸压技术研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2008,25(1):37-40.
|
| 26 |
杨平,柯昌松,汪仁和,等 .破裂井壁中开切卸压槽的设计与工艺[J].建井技术,1995(1):29-32.
|
| 27 |
罗勇,沈兆武 .深孔控制卸压爆破机理和防突试验研究[J].力学季刊,2006,27(3):26-32.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
景海河,胡刚,武雄 .孔底爆破卸压法控制采区巷道底臌的数值模拟研究[J].黑龙江矿业学院学报,2000,10(4):11-14.
|
| 35 |
熊祖强,贺怀建 .冲击地压应力状态及卸压治理数值模拟[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2006,23(4):489-493.
|
| 36 |
徐颖,吕渊 .软岩巷道深孔爆破卸压机理及工程应用[C]// 2006全国矿山建设学术会议议文集(下册).北京:中国矿业大学出版社,2006:15-19.
|
| 37 |
邢昭芳,阎永利,李会良 .深孔控制卸压爆破防突机理和效果考察[J].煤炭学报,1991,16(2): 1-9.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
吴刚,阳友奎,邱贤德 .煤矿采场的变弹模光弹模拟[J].矿业安全与环保,1992(3):19-24.
|
| 42 |
郭文兵,李楠,王有凯 .软岩巷道围岩应力分布规律光弹性模拟实验研究[J].煤炭学报,2002,27(6):596-600.
|
| 43 |
李俊平,王红星,王晓光,等 .卸压开采研究进展[J].岩土力学,2014,35(增2):350-358,363.
|
| 44 |
潘一山,章梦涛,王来贵,等 .地下硐室岩爆的相似材料模拟试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,1997,19(4):49-56.
|
| 45 |
林海飞,李树刚,成连华,等 .覆岩采动裂隙演化形态的相似材料模拟实验[J].西安科技大学学报,2010,30(5):507-512.
|
| 46 |
王悦汉,王彩根,康红普 .采用围岩卸压法维护软岩硐室的模拟研究[C]//第一届华东岩土工程学术大会论文集.北京:中国岩石力学与工程学会,1990:244-253.
|
| 47 |
鲁岩,邹喜正,刘长友,等 .巷旁开掘卸压技术研究与应用[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2006,23(3):329-333.
|
| 48 |
易帅,唐海,王建龙,等 .卸压巷对被保护变形影响的数值模拟[J].采矿技术,2017,17(6):55-58.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |